• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Stock Bottom End 1/4 mile times.

  • Thread starter Thread starter woodyy24
  • Start date Start date Aug 21, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Aug 22, 2008
#21
  • Aug 22, 2008
  • #21
Personally i get nervous with a mid-low 11 second stock bottom end...but that's just me, probably because i drive it like i hate it every time i take it to the track.
 
G

GTOreturns

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2003
51
17
59
West Coast Best Coast
Aug 22, 2008
#22
  • Aug 22, 2008
  • #22
25thmustang said:
Not sure what this debate is about?

No they dont't spend a lot of money, No they don't drive them to work, Yes maybe they are a little retarded, No actually the guys I know don't brag about the block one bit, don't care too. I would assume most guys who are putting out 400-500-600 hp are only driving the cars on nice days and racing them every so often. You will see less 600 hp daily drivers than you will 10 second stock block cars, that I can assure.

Noones debating a stock block is better than an aftermarket one, that would in itself be retarded. What he asked (or seemed too) was how fast people have gone with them, and thats what I and a few others are sharing? Maybe I misread the post somewhere but thats what I thought this was about, no?

Guess I just cant follow some of these threads when they turn from asking a question into a debate about being retarded...
Click to expand...

yeah your 100% correct. Sorry to stray from the OP.
 

woodyy24

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
290
0
0
illinois
Aug 22, 2008
#23
  • Aug 22, 2008
  • #23
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Personally i get nervous with a mid-low 11 second stock bottom end...but that's just me, probably because i drive it like i hate it every time i take it to the track.
Click to expand...

meh, its held up pretty good. i even drive it the 1.5 hours there and back. lol
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Aug 22, 2008
#24
  • Aug 22, 2008
  • #24
woodyy24 said:
meh, its held up pretty good. i even drive it the 1.5 hours there and back. lol
Click to expand...


Is yours rebuilt or anything? I'm starting to worry about mine after seeing the smoke from the tail pipes in my recent runs..it's got a ton of miles on it and i worry about a spun bearing or something more than breaking the crank or a rod. Plus on mine i'm fairly sure my cylinder compression is low...my rings are pretty much wore out.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Aug 22, 2008
#25
  • Aug 22, 2008
  • #25
Mine ran strong when the rings were shot... I rebuilt it and it runs decent now.

I would LOVE to toss a tranny and a 175-200 shot on my brothers GT40P car. I think it would have 10s in it...
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Aug 22, 2008
#26
  • Aug 22, 2008
  • #26
I've always heard that an engine runs strongest just before it lets go...i've also heard of people building race engines with real loose rings to reduce friction so maybe old seasoned rings make a tad more power
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Aug 22, 2008
#27
  • Aug 22, 2008
  • #27
Loose is fast, thats well know in racing circles. Loose also causes issues sometimes.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Aug 22, 2008
#28
  • Aug 22, 2008
  • #28
Yeah i'm sure a loose race engine is a lot different than a loose 150k mile stock engine.
 

woodyy24

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
290
0
0
illinois
Aug 22, 2008
#29
  • Aug 22, 2008
  • #29
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Is yours rebuilt or anything? I'm starting to worry about mine after seeing the smoke from the tail pipes in my recent runs..it's got a ton of miles on it and i worry about a spun bearing or something more than breaking the crank or a rod. Plus on mine i'm fairly sure my cylinder compression is low...my rings are pretty much wore out.
Click to expand...

its a shortblock with hyper pistons i got from jegs like 5 years ago.
probably has around 20,000 miles on it.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Staytuned stock bottem end build...
  • rednotch
  • Dec 13, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
337
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 13, 2025
Noobz347
A
Thinking of building a BOSS 302 bottom end and have some questions!
  • Angelq1028
  • Apr 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
381
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2025
TOOLOW91
G
1991 GT 5.0 running hot
  • gvanginkel403
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
152
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 2, 2026
General karthief
S
Fuel rail help
  • stang9150
  • Mar 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
338
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 5, 2026
stang9150
S
W
I have some 4.6 questions.
  • whiskerz
  • Nov 14, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
290
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 25, 2025
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?