• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

stroke and setup question

  • Thread starter Thread starter cbarr300
  • Start date Start date Nov 17, 2006
C

cbarr300

Member
Jun 6, 2006
746
0
17
goose creek, SC
Nov 17, 2006
#1
  • Nov 17, 2006
  • #1
quick question...well......maybe long

I've been planning on going with a DAILY DRIVER N/A 427 that will see the track maybe once a year. I don't plan on revving it all too high since the downlow torque will be nice enough. I was planning on CHPs 427 pro-street short block. http://coasthigh.com/Assemblies/Ford/ford_427w.htm. Shooting for ~450 torque and letting the horsepower fall where it may

I've been looking around for around 4 months now and the whole 427/418/408/etc thing seems to be more preference than anything. Just wondering if anyone had any SOLID evidence that a 427 as a daily driver isn't a good thing. I know that clearances suck when building them.... but I'm not concerned with that since it's a shortblock being built by CHP. I know the WHYS of why I shouldn't do it....just haven't SEEN the whys.

Also, since I'm going with an engine that isn't going to be revving too high too often, and since I want more downlow torque rather than top end power, I was planning on going with AFR 205s vs. 225 Opinions? Cam by Ed, and I was looking at an efi spyder intake

Thanks for the insight
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Nov 18, 2006
#2
  • Nov 18, 2006
  • #2
I'm not totally familiar with CHP's kits, but looking at it, it uses a 4.170 inch stroke, so it possibly uses a 6.125 inch rod, thus leaving your rod ratio at only 1.47:1. That's not very good for engine longevity, and may very well cause the wrist pin to intersect the oil ring. I'd personally go with their 408 pro-street for the same price and worry less about what sort of mileage the engine will sustain. If you have any concerns like these, you should voice them to the tech guys over there, as I'm sure they'd never want to steer you in the wrong direction, especially considering the price is the same either way.
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Nov 18, 2006
#3
  • Nov 18, 2006
  • #3
I don't know about which one would last longer between the 408/418/427, but I can help you with some of the parts of being a dd.
1. It's gonna be LOUD. I would go with either some quiet mufflers or a 4 muffler setup if you're gonna be driving it everyday.
2. Expect your gas mileage to be in the 6-8mpg range if you get on it a lot. In town you may get 10-12 going easy, and I get around 17-18 on the highway.
3. The spyder intake isn't really designed for low end torque. My friend made 462hp@6100/440tq@4700 with that intake, AFR 225's, and TFS stage 3 cam with his 427. Talk to Ed, he can help you out with that more than I can.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Intro and FB questions
  • gflat65
  • Nov 16, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
281
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 25, 2025
horse sence
F
Ford 460 swap
  • Ford460
  • Sep 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
446
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 14, 2026
Ford460
F
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
571
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
424
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
P
Air Fuel ratio bung location.
  • Praetorious
  • Feb 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
39
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 11, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?