• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Stroker?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vin1382
  • Start date Start date Feb 10, 2004
V

vin1382

New Member
Oct 17, 2003
27
0
0
Feb 10, 2004
#1
  • Feb 10, 2004
  • #1
I know that stroking a motor will increase its displacement..but thats pretty much where my knowledge ends. What exactly do you replace and change when you stroke a motor? How do you know what displacement it will make when you are done?

Would it be safer to supercharge my 351w without stroking it? Or could i stroke it up a bit and then supercharge it without worrrying if my engine life is going to shorten?
 
U

usedtobe 67p51d

New Member
Jul 8, 2003
208
0
0
let's tear up golfcourses and build race tracks!
Feb 10, 2004
#2
  • Feb 10, 2004
  • #2
yes you can stroke it, it's done by changing the crank,rods,& pistons. as for life, yep you'll shorten it the more h.p. the shorter the life of the motor,
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Feb 10, 2004
#3
  • Feb 10, 2004
  • #3
depending on how much power you want out of the motor, stroking or supercharging could be your best bet. you can combine both if you choose. it also depends on what type of power you want, meaning high rpm power or low rpm power. stroking is an easy way to get low and midrange power, and, except for a roots type blower, supercharging, or turbocharging is a good way to get mid range and high rpm power. as was stated, anytime you increase power, you decrease the life of the engine. how much depends on how much maintenance you give the engine, and how you use the engine.
 
V

vin1382

New Member
Oct 17, 2003
27
0
0
Feb 10, 2004
#4
  • Feb 10, 2004
  • #4
rbohm said:
depending on how much power you want out of the motor, stroking or supercharging could be your best bet. you can combine both if you choose. it also depends on what type of power you want, meaning high rpm power or low rpm power. stroking is an easy way to get low and midrange power, and, except for a roots type blower, supercharging, or turbocharging is a good way to get mid range and high rpm power. as was stated, anytime you increase power, you decrease the life of the engine. how much depends on how much maintenance you give the engine, and how you use the engine.
Click to expand...


I think I would rather have low-midrange power. maybe up to 6000 rpms or a little more. What sizes can you stroke a 351w to?
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Feb 10, 2004
#5
  • Feb 10, 2004
  • #5
vin1382 said:
I think I would rather have low-midrange power. maybe up to 6000 rpms or a little more. What sizes can you stroke a 351w to?
Click to expand...

393 and 408 are the most popular, but i've also heard of 377, 383, 392, the almighty 427 and others
 
V

vin1382

New Member
Oct 17, 2003
27
0
0
Feb 10, 2004
#6
  • Feb 10, 2004
  • #6
SadbutTrue said:
393 and 408 are the most popular, but i've also heard of 377, 383, 392, the almighty 427 and others
Click to expand...

Not bad. I've heard of lots of people doing 393's. Any idea how much a kit would cost to get it up to 393? What companies make them? Lets say I have a fairly stock windor, and i up it to a 393. Without changin the heads or the cam, what will i be looking at as far as increases in hp and tq? (im definalty doing heads and cam...but i want to know what do to first..heads and cam..or stroker and then heads and cam?)

Thanks so far for info!
 
M

mp67

Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
392
0
0
Texas
Feb 10, 2004
#7
  • Feb 10, 2004
  • #7
vin1382 said:
Not bad. I've heard of lots of people doing 393's. Any idea how much a kit would cost to get it up to 393? What companies make them? Lets say I have a fairly stock windor, and i up it to a 393. Without changin the heads or the cam, what will i be looking at as far as increases in hp and tq? (im definalty doing heads and cam...but i want to know what do to first..heads and cam..or stroker and then heads and cam?)

Thanks so far for info!
Click to expand...

Cost of a decent crank, rods and pistons stroker kit will run you 1500 or so. some cost less, but offer inferior parts. If your not shooting over 400hp, you can get away with cast parts, but if you want to supercharge, you better get all forged. www.coasthigh.com, dndmotorsports.com, among others offer everything from stroker kits to shortblocks, to longblocks, to complete engines. If you add up the cost of the stroker kit, block prep, parts, heads, balancing and blueprinting, I found it cheaper to go with a longbock. Stay away from speedomotive. Lots of people on this board have given them bad reviews.

Oh, and if you decide not to go with a short or longblock, do the stroker first. You need to build the bottom end first. If you waste time and money doing heads and cam, you just have to take all that apart to stroke the motor.
 
M

mp67

Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
392
0
0
Texas
Feb 10, 2004
#8
  • Feb 10, 2004
  • #8
usedtobe 67p51d said:
as for life, yep you'll shorten it the more h.p. the shorter the life of the motor,
Click to expand...

This is incorrect. Just adding hp does not shorten the life. Its adding to much hp and using it on a regular basis without using quality parts. Example:1996 GT with 4.6 engine making 225hp. 2005 gt making 300hp. Is the 2005 motor going to have a shorter life than the 96 cause ford has increased hp by 75? No, cause they use the appropriate part. If you stroke a motor and used cast pistons, that is fine for a certain level of hp. If you go beyond that, you need forged pistons. Same with rods, crank, main and rod bolts etc..

Now, if you are going to flog this motor on a regular basis then that is what will shorten lifespan.
 
V

vin1382

New Member
Oct 17, 2003
27
0
0
Feb 10, 2004
#9
  • Feb 10, 2004
  • #9
mp67 said:
Cost of a decent crank, rods and pistons stroker kit will run you 1500 or so. some cost less, but offer inferior parts. If your not shooting over 400hp, you can get away with cast parts, but if you want to supercharge, you better get all forged. www.coasthigh.com, dndmotorsports.com, among others offer everything from stroker kits to shortblocks, to longblocks, to complete engines. If you add up the cost of the stroker kit, block prep, parts, heads, balancing and blueprinting, I found it cheaper to go with a longbock. Stay away from speedomotive. Lots of people on this board have given them bad reviews.

Oh, and if you decide not to go with a short or longblock, do the stroker first. You need to build the bottom end first. If you waste time and money doing heads and cam, you just have to take all that apart to stroke the motor.
Click to expand...

Stupid question...what is a long block or a short block? i see them being advertised all the time in magazines. what advantage does one have over the other?
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Feb 10, 2004
#10
  • Feb 10, 2004
  • #10
short block is block, crank, rods, pistons...basically the reciprocating assembly.

Longblock is the above plus cam, heads, and valvetrain.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
599
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
728
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
J
1996 v6-v8 swap
  • jujuonurmom
  • Oct 28, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
183
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 28, 2025
jujuonurmom
J
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
628
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
J
'04 3.8L V6 mineral deposits and oil on #3 cylinder. Does it need a rebuild or something simpler?
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 18, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
216
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jun 9, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?