• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Stud mount rocker vs pedestal mount rocker cylinder heads?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Great68
  • Start date Start date Dec 3, 2003

Great68

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
691
0
16
Victoria BC
Dec 3, 2003
#1
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #1
Which is better, and can you put a set of pedestal rocker heads on a 289?

I'm asking because someone I know is selling a set of the #60379 Edelbrock heads and I want to know if I can actually just bolt them on to my motor without any problems.

Thanks!
 
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
Stockton, Ca
Dec 3, 2003
#2
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #2
there is no better or worse. Just depends what your going to use it for?

Yes you can run those heads as long as you check the push rod length.
 

Great68

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
691
0
16
Victoria BC
Dec 3, 2003
#3
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #3
Oh, ok thanks. I heard that the stud mount are stronger than the pedestal, but I'm probably wrong.

What scenario would warrant choosing one system over another?
 

6Stang7

New Member
Jun 1, 2003
1,470
0
0
Livermore, CA
Dec 3, 2003
#4
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #4
Isn't pedestal were you use a bolt to hold the rocker arm down, while stud uses a nut? If it is, then I think pedestal is better, but I'm not sure why. I remeber reading a thread on this very same topic in the 5.0 section, and it was stated that pedestal rockers were better.

-Shaun
 
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
Stockton, Ca
Dec 3, 2003
#5
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #5
Pedestal mount are more for stock applications where decking wasn't involved or big profile cams. Easy to install as long as you check the geometry. Never had them make noise once I installed them.

stud are better for adjusting to changes in the engine. Almost always require readjusting once the engine is ran. Do yourself a favor and get poly locks if you get stud mounted rockers much much better.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Dec 4, 2003
#6
  • Dec 4, 2003
  • #6
6Stang7 said:
Isn't pedestal were you use a bolt to hold the rocker arm down, while stud uses a nut? If it is, then I think pedestal is better, but I'm not sure why. I remeber reading a thread on this very same topic in the 5.0 section, and it was stated that pedestal rockers were better.
Click to expand...
Pedestals have a shoulder for a more positive stop, there's no nut under the rocker on a stud. Also there are pressed in versus threaded studs. Under normal use (sub 5,000 RPM) with mild camshafts (0.475 or so) and springs the pressed in shafts are fine. Under high perfromance conditions they can work loose or cause flexing with catastrophic results.
 

mustang70

Founding Member
Nov 15, 2001
2,445
2
48
San Diego
Dec 4, 2003
#7
  • Dec 4, 2003
  • #7
One thing, pedestal mount rockers don't use a stud. They use a long bolt. There are two different kind of stud mounts. One is pressed and the other is threaded into the head. The threaded studs won't pull out with high lift and/or stiff springs.
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
Dec 4, 2003
#8
  • Dec 4, 2003
  • #8
Ped mounts heads will interchange!! use the late model 302 pushrods.. ( like the 79-83 type) !! and rock!!

The stud mounts are stronger... and they are NEEDED when there is a lot of spring pressures and high rpm!! however thay can be used on any of the SBFs and allow a tuning aid for low/mid/topend by varing the lash. Which the bolt down peds dont have cool?? Easy?? ped mounts !! Tunability.. stud mounts!!

Just me.....................

Thumper
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SOLD Sold.
  • TTSaleen
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
6
Views
305
Engine and Power Adder Jul 2, 2026
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
931
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
752
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
T
Engine 1970 302 boss block
  • TOM B
  • Jan 4, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
435
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jan 14, 2025
lqbbe
L
C
Drivetrain Need assistance
  • ChrisPBacon323
  • Dec 7, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
308
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 30, 2024
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?