• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Stupid question of the week.

  • Thread starter Thread starter raidmagic
  • Start date Start date Feb 12, 2008
R

raidmagic

New Member
Dec 11, 2004
30
0
0
Feb 12, 2008
#1
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #1
Where did the term "Fox body" come from when speaking of those year Mustangs. Thanks.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Feb 12, 2008
#2
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #2
There's lots of debate but i don't think i've ever heard an official answer. It's one of those internal Ford things....just like i heard that the Chevy bowtie was taken from a wall paper pattern in Italy. Who knows
 
I

iwashmycar

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 7, 2004
1,236
1
39
Columbus, Ohio
Feb 12, 2008
#3
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #3
i thought it was the platform.....named fox4 or 5 or something?
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Feb 12, 2008
#4
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #4
Yeah it is the platform name, but where they derived the question i think is what he's asking.
 

5.0 Nostalgia

10 Year Member
Feb 28, 2003
904
5
39
CT
Feb 12, 2008
#5
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #5
I remember reading the explanation somewhere. I think it was just a random name given to the Fairmont and Mustang platform back in the mid-70's when they began work on the new models. I think I read it in the Technical Reference and Performance Handbook. I will go check.
 
M

Mike85000

New Member
Feb 22, 2007
65
0
0
Feb 12, 2008
#6
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #6
I thought it was the FX chassis platform and was dubbed "Fox" derived from "FX"

Could be wrong though.
 

68stang351

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
850
9
39
Savoy TX
Feb 12, 2008
#7
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #7
I've read in numerous Mustang books that talk about the official way that the "fox" chassis got its name. In the 70's when the Ford started development on the fox chassis, they wanted a chassis that they could build a car off of that could be used in multiple car lines, but they also wanted the chassis to outperform the wildly popular (in Europe) Rabbit. What kills a Rabbit? A Fox. I have several books here that state that as a fact.
 

68stang351

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
850
9
39
Savoy TX
Feb 12, 2008
#8
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #8
Here's a direct quote from one of the books:

"Sperlich saw in his mind a car for both Europe and the Americas. With identical engines, suspensions and bodies, the car would sell on both continents. Casting molds and stamping dies would be the same. Ford engineering would make it fuel-efficient as well as manufacturing and cost effective because parts would be interchangeable worldwide. The group launched this project to develop a common platform that would support both a sporty car and a four or five passenger sedan early in 1973. They code named it the Fox."


It was so named the Fox because it was supposed to be the Rabbit-killer in Europe.
 

5.0 Nostalgia

10 Year Member
Feb 28, 2003
904
5
39
CT
Feb 12, 2008
#9
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #9
Here's what I got from the Ford book:

"Upper management personnel being rotated out of their European assignments came away from the Continent impressed by a 'foreign car' called Fox. The Fox was produced by Germany's Volkswagen offshoot, Audi NSU Auto Union AG, and the line was being destributed domestically by Porsche-Audi. As Ford's (Maverick-replacement) new-car team formed, it included some of those former Ford of Europe managers, and the Fox import became the Ford team's 'unofficial' development target. Not because the Audi Fox was the car that Ford wanted to build, but because Audi's Fox had a reasonable price structure and a variety of positive characteristics that posed achievable goals."

(The Official Ford Mustang 5.0 Technical Reference and Performance Handbook)
 

68stang351

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
850
9
39
Savoy TX
Feb 12, 2008
#10
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #10
5.0 Nostalgia said:
Here's what I got from the Ford book:

"Upper management personnel being rotated out of their European assignments came away from the Continent impressed by a 'foreign car' called Fox. The Fox was produced by Germany's Volkswagen offshoot, Audi NSU Auto Union AG, and the line was being destributed domestically by Porsche-Audi. As Ford's (Maverick-replacement) new-car team formed, it included some of those former Ford of Europe managers, and the Fox import became the Ford team's 'unofficial' development target. Not because the Audi Fox was the car that Ford wanted to build, but because Audi's Fox had a reasonable price structure and a variety of positive characteristics that posed achievable goals."

(The Official Ford Mustang 5.0 Technical Reference and Performance Handbook)
Click to expand...

I was also looking for that qoute because I know I read it somewhere but I forgot about that book.

BTW, isn't that one of the best books you've ever bought? I think everyone on this board should have a copy of it. It has an unbelievable amount of info (as far as parts i.d. and interchangeability) doesn't it?
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Feb 12, 2008
#11
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #11
68stang351 said:
I've read in numerous Mustang books that talk about the official way that the "fox" chassis got its name. In the 70's when the Ford started development on the fox chassis, they wanted a chassis that they could build a car off of that could be used in multiple car lines, but they also wanted the chassis to outperform the wildly popular (in Europe) Rabbit. What kills a Rabbit? A Fox. I have several books here that state that as a fact.
Click to expand...


Now that you mention it that does sound familiar but you gotta admit it's pretty silly. It's not like the Rabbit was anything to associate with performance.
 

5.0 Nostalgia

10 Year Member
Feb 28, 2003
904
5
39
CT
Feb 12, 2008
#12
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #12
68stang351 said:
I was also looking for that qoute because I know I read it somewhere but I forgot about that book.

BTW, isn't that one of the best books you've ever bought? I think everyone on this board should have a copy of it. It has an unbelievable amount of info (as far as parts i.d. and interchangeability) doesn't it?
Click to expand...

Yeah. That is a must read for anyone with a Fox Mustang. Some of the part #'s they talk about are now discontinued (unfortunately). I think that actually makes this book even more important because anyone looking for OEM parts can use it for reference. This book is pretty much where I got a good deal of information about the changes year by year. It even tells you some of the bad features about these cars.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
C4 trans help needed
  • CPH89LX
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
214
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 28, 2026
CPH89LX
C
Project Fox Revival (please send help)
  • sleep-e
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
249
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 22, 2026
KRUISR
Electrical/engine bay harness questions
  • djj62478
  • May 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
272
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 6, 2026
djj62478
Lost my Foxbody
  • Mhalc1
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
737
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 17, 2026
Mhalc1
S
New here , too many cars and too many problems
  • spencergt66
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
169
The Welcome Wagon Mar 21, 2026
spencergt66
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?