• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Subframe Connectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter bishop1911
  • Start date Start date Jan 7, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
B

bishop1911

New Member
Apr 11, 2005
122
0
0
Jan 7, 2007
#1
  • Jan 7, 2007
  • #1
I have a 67 fastback and need to decide between subframe connectors. My concerns are strength and ground clearance. The TCP square subframe connectors say they ar .083" thick metal and then Global west says it is .125" thick metal. The TCP is square and Global WEst is tubular. I would like to get any feedback anyone has on these so I can make a decision on which to put on my car. My car has been lowered with the shelby drop and new suspension, so I would like to get good ground clearance, but also want something strong and that also looks good and not stupid. Any feedback you guys have would be great. Thanks.

Jon
 
O

ohyaa

Member
May 27, 2004
42
0
6
Henderson, NV
Jan 7, 2007
#2
  • Jan 7, 2007
  • #2
I used the Global West connectors. They did not reduce clearance from what I can tell on my 67 coupe. They looked great out of the box and easy to install, welded in position. I also lowered the front with a negative wedge kit and stock replacement rear leafs.
 

CarFreakGT

20+ Year Stangneter
May 26, 2003
395
11
29
Louisville, KY
Jan 7, 2007
#3
  • Jan 7, 2007
  • #3
bishop--You don't say if you've definitely narrowed it to those two choices. If so, this may not help, and I apologize. But, I read (no personal experience) a lot of good things about the maier racing SFC as well, in case you want to check them out. If so, try a search. I remember someone posting some pics of theirs installed specifically to show ground clearance.

Good luck as you decide!
 
G

gsxrken

Member
Sep 12, 2005
206
1
18
Weschester County, NY
Jan 7, 2007
#4
  • Jan 7, 2007
  • #4
+1 for the GW ones. They are at the same height as your front frame extensions that they weld to, just extend it backwards. At the rear, they arc up a bit to grab the rear frame. I'm sure your exhaust will be lower than these.
I tend to believe that ANY frame connector is worth it, and that sweating over which brand to go with is nit-picking (except for the ones that hack up the floor). But with that said, I did nit-pick too, and went with the GW after research.

Edit- if you look at my sig picture, you can just see the rear of the connector by the rear wheel. In the front, my exhaust is slightly lower than the connectors. My car is lowered 1-1/2 all around.
 
J

jarrettdad

New Member
Sep 14, 2006
10
0
0
Jan 7, 2007
#5
  • Jan 7, 2007
  • #5
I have the TCP's with the cross brace. Very nice. I don't think you could go wrong with either of them.
 

Pbum5

Member
Oct 27, 2004
515
0
17
Minneapolis, MN
Jan 7, 2007
#6
  • Jan 7, 2007
  • #6
I have Competition Engineering ones on my car. They are the cheapest and probably provide the most clearance on all Sub Frame connectors. I got the “Bolt In” ones and also had them welded in..
 
R

Rapid

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
297
1
0
Columbia, SC
Jan 8, 2007
#7
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #7
I have the CE brand as well. They attach easily and give you an option to weld or not after trying them with the other components you have. They also made a hugh difference.
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Jan 8, 2007
#8
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #8
I also have the CE's and also noticed a great improvement in handling after installation. They have excellent ground clearance. As recommended by the seller, I bought the bolt-on ones and then welded them on. The bolt-ons have additional material connected to the subframes.

If I was building a road racer, then I might have considered the more expensive options.
 

68FBJJZ109

Member
May 2, 2005
357
0
17
Easton, PA
Jan 8, 2007
#9
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #9
I have the TCP with the cross brace as well the're very nice, although the car has no motor i have jacked it up and had it come of three of the four jack stands. And all of the TCP stuff i have i very high quality.
 

ultrastang

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
1,092
2
37
Arkansas
Jan 8, 2007
#10
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #10
I have Total Control subframe connectors on my '68, but probably the best design I've seen was custom done by my friend Håkan on his '67.

They blend in between the front and rear frame extensions to look like one continuous frame rail. They are the same thickness as the original frame rails, so they do not hang down like everyone else's sub frame connectors.

( Picture from Håkan's website at www.vikingmustang.com )

http://images20.fotki.com/v367/photos/1/1058965/4389365/DSCN6626-vi.jpg?1168177610
 

AdamInChains

Member
Apr 22, 2006
128
0
16
Jan 8, 2007
#11
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #11
I have the Maier ones and they fit very well
 

xoxbxfx

Founding Member
May 9, 2001
3,959
0
0
Southlake, TX
Jan 8, 2007
#12
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #12
ultrastang said:
I have Total Control subframe connectors on my '68, but probably the best design I've seen was custom done by my friend Håkan on his '67.

They blend in between the front and rear frame extensions to look like one continuous frame rail. They are the same thickness as the original frame rails, so they do not hang down like everyone else's sub frame connectors.

( Picture from Håkan's website at www.vikingmustang.com )

http://images20.fotki.com/v367/photos/1/1058965/4389365/DSCN6626-vi.jpg?1168177610
Click to expand...

whos mustang junkyard in Texas?? Thats a ton of fenders and some 69 stuff I really need for a fastback project...
 

Håkan

Founding Member
Apr 1, 2002
168
0
0
Enköping, Sweden
Jan 8, 2007
#13
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #13
xoxbxfx said:
whos mustang junkyard in Texas?? Thats a ton of fenders and some 69 stuff I really need for a fastback project...
Click to expand...

I took those pics in July ´04 at Mustangmania in Katy.

Thanks ultrastang!
 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
Washington, MO
Jan 8, 2007
#14
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #14
I have TCP welded and they have worked well.....
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jan 8, 2007
#15
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #15
the coolest ones i've seen are from Spin Tech. they weld to the floor pan and continue the front subframe all the way to the back. they aren't like a normal SFC and ground clearance with them is excellent. Mustang Depot has them, here's a link, they are all the way down at the bottom

http://mustangdepot.com/OnLineCatalog/Suspension/subframe-connectors.htm
 

xoxbxfx

Founding Member
May 9, 2001
3,959
0
0
Southlake, TX
Jan 8, 2007
#16
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #16
Håkan said:
I took those pics in July ´04 at Mustangmania in Katy.

Thanks ultrastang!
Click to expand...

I figured that was him...all his brake setup stuff.. I need to see if he wants to sell stuff soon I had a hard time rustling up some 65-66 fender...hes got a ton
 

Håkan

Founding Member
Apr 1, 2002
168
0
0
Enköping, Sweden
Jan 9, 2007
#17
  • Jan 9, 2007
  • #17
xoxbxfx said:
I figured that was him...all his brake setup stuff.. I need to see if he wants to sell stuff soon I had a hard time rustling up some 65-66 fender...hes got a ton
Click to expand...

Just to be clear, Mustangmania is a company in Katy, Texas where I took the pics.

"ultrastang" is my friend Steve Ainsworth in Arkansas with his Ultrastang Performance who made the comment about the subframe connectors I´ve made.
 

jb1dsl

Member
May 24, 2004
566
0
17
Marianna, Fl.
Jan 9, 2007
#18
  • Jan 9, 2007
  • #18
Has anyone got those sfc's from spintech or seen them on a car. They look like a great way to go to keep clearence but how sturdy are they compared to the other top brands?
 

xoxbxfx

Founding Member
May 9, 2001
3,959
0
0
Southlake, TX
Jan 9, 2007
#19
  • Jan 9, 2007
  • #19
Håkan said:
Just to be clear, Mustangmania is a company in Katy, Texas where I took the pics.

"ultrastang" is my friend Steve Ainsworth in Arkansas with his Ultrastang Performance who made the comment about the subframe connectors I´ve made.
Click to expand...

oh ok...thanks!!
 

joncash

just high enough to be functional
Founding Member
Dec 9, 2000
756
4
39
The USA's peen
Jan 10, 2007
#20
  • Jan 10, 2007
  • #20
I don't know about you guys but that SFC/stiffener setup from Heidt's in the Mustang Depot link is really cool. That would be a nice foundation for a cage, just tie it to the weld in SFC's, and the bolt-in stiffener would square off the base.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Dec 16, 2024
revhead347
Fox Build ideas for the 'Hudson Heap' (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Sep 19, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 27, 2023
MadSquirrelTech
2004 Mach 1 crank but no start. dying inside
  • gavinmgrant
  • May 23, 2022
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
50
Views
10K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 11, 2022
Mach1.0
M
Engine Ron Francis aka The Detail Zone and their Ford harnesses are beyond poor quality.Here's why.
  • CAMTWO1070
  • Oct 20, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 13, 2022
CAMTWO1070
New to me Fox body. Looking for Rough HP and compression ratio
  • Halford4491
  • Oct 30, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 3, 2021
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?