• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Supercharged 2.3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dan P.
  • Start date Start date Oct 18, 2006

Dan P.

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
483
0
27
N.C.
Oct 18, 2006
#1
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #1
This is the first real supercharged 2.3 that I have ever seen. Just thought I would share it with you guys.



Here is the link to his page http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/p16.htm
 

Attachments

  • pssuccess.webp
    408.9 KB · Views: 136

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Oct 18, 2006
#2
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #2
that looks like a PITA, too much work for too little gain. at 30% gain he only running about 140-150hp. if he had dropped in a 2.3t he could have doubled his hp to 220 and have a lot more room under the hood.
 

Shawneebear93

20+ Year Stangneter
May 4, 2004
518
17
49
Salisbury Twp, Allentown, PA
Oct 18, 2006
#3
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #3
Definitely looks like a crapload of work to even make it fit and route th epiping. But, definitely cool to see it! Thanks for the share!
 
T

Touring23

Founding Member
Dec 29, 2001
294
0
0
Washington
Oct 18, 2006
#4
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #4
Second that, I think it's cool because of the attempt.
 
S

Shinlee

New Member
Feb 10, 2006
146
0
0
Oct 18, 2006
#5
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #5
kudos to him for trying something new and intreguing
 
R

RustBucket

New Member
Jun 8, 2003
585
0
0
Buford, GA
Oct 18, 2006
#6
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #6
There was a pretty good discussion regarding a blown 2.3 a while back, but I think this is the first time I've seen it done.


There's some interesting stuff there for sure. At first I was intrigued by the engine driven fan until I realized it was a Ranger. Notice that he's running what looks to be the stock MAF. It's at a funky angle but it apparently works. It sure got crowded over there on the passenger side didn't it? Did anyone else catch the twin throttle bodies? It looks like the linkages might be tied together, but only the TPS on the one near the fender is wired.

It'd certainly be worth it to see how this project progresses. It looks like the hard part has been done, now it's time to work out the bugs, chase out the weak links and fine tune the package. It'd be interesting to see where it max's out and how it performs against the turbo.
 

Dan P.

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
483
0
27
N.C.
Oct 18, 2006
#7
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #7
He also is running this on a stock bottom end. I too saw the twin TBs makes me want to go back to the yard and get the Super Coupe supercharger I found today........ NOT.

Dan
 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,896
73
129
Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Oct 18, 2006
#8
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #8
I believe I've seen that truck before...looks like a weird-ass setup, I have to wonder how much fab work went into that vs. throwing on a turbo....probably a lot more.
 
R

RustBucket

New Member
Jun 8, 2003
585
0
0
Buford, GA
Oct 18, 2006
#9
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #9
Dan P. said:
He also is running this on a stock bottom end. I too saw the twin TBs makes me want to go back to the yard and get the Super Coupe supercharger I found today........ NOT.
Click to expand...


Seeing as how more often than not it was the supercharger that put them in the junkyard I agree its best to stay away from 'em. The most aptly named supercharger ever. Eaton. Eaton belts, Eaton bearings, Eaton my hard-earned money.

He claims he's running about 5psi so that keeps him right about where everyone agrees the threshold between cast and burnt pistons lies.


RedLX, Aside from the intercooler piping and mounting, everything else he's done is way outside the norm of a turbo swap.

I got a kick out of his EEC tuning. Make hardware changes and drive it til it figures out what I done. It must work, don't let the Tweecer guys hear this.

All joking aside, the guy did what he set out to do and that alone is commendable.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Oct 19, 2006
#10
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #10
I salute his ingenuity, but I still see this guy as a man with too much time on his hands. better results could have been made with far less effort and money.
 
R

RustBucket

New Member
Jun 8, 2003
585
0
0
Buford, GA
Oct 19, 2006
#11
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #11
Agreed.
 

Slow92LX

New Member
Apr 1, 2005
49
0
0
Where ever I roam
Oct 21, 2006
#12
  • Oct 21, 2006
  • #12
newer Ranger 2.3s are blown all the time, unless im thinking of the 4.0 version?
 

snake109

New Member
Dec 2, 2004
60
1
0
Austin TX
Oct 21, 2006
#13
  • Oct 21, 2006
  • #13
i think your thinking of the whipple charged 3.0 v6's in the rangers
 

Distortion 5.0

New Member
Jul 8, 2005
114
0
0
Oct 23, 2006
#14
  • Oct 23, 2006
  • #14
that's the craziest s**t I've ever seen. Ya know, there is a blower I've seen installed on cameros on tv that is the size of like an AC compressor, in fact, I think I saw one that adapter platted into the stock position of that part and used the stock belt. Maybe that could work on the 2.3 a hell of alot easier than that monstrosouty. Still, as a mad genius who will do anything to gain a horse or two, I tip my hat to him. He freaking did all that work for 5 psi of boost. I have often wondered if it would be worth it to hook a 100 p.s.i air tank and small compressor up to a 2.3 and set it for like 2-4 lbs of release and have a button for it like a cheap small nitrous boost. maybe a stage two switch that set's it at 10 psi. It would be short lived, but if it got you down the track, the compressor could recharge your tank during staging. Hell, if you had the balls, I reckon you could even charge it with butane.
 

TurboFlush

Founding Member
Dec 8, 1999
1,984
0
0
Germany
Oct 24, 2006
#15
  • Oct 24, 2006
  • #15
that is awesome. the talk always comes up once a year atleast. but this is the first I have ever seen of some action..

props!!!


TF
 

Dan P.

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
483
0
27
N.C.
Oct 24, 2006
#16
  • Oct 24, 2006
  • #16
Speaking of poping up once a year...... Good to see you back here TurboFlush
 

Shawneebear93

20+ Year Stangneter
May 4, 2004
518
17
49
Salisbury Twp, Allentown, PA
Oct 24, 2006
#17
  • Oct 24, 2006
  • #17
^^^I was thinking the same thing!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
Ford driver for 60 + years. Just bought a 1978 Blakely Bearcat 2.3 L ford
  • freesailor
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
209
The Welcome Wagon Aug 18, 2025
General karthief
P
rear Impact absorbers.
  • Praetorious
  • May 4, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
155
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2026
Praetorious
P
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
950
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
680
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
F
For Sale 03 Redfire Cobra Convertible
  • FastFox5oh
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
90
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Jul 14, 2026
FastFox5oh
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?