• Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech

Supercharging!!!????

  • Thread starter Thread starter IICrazy
  • Start date Start date Aug 14, 2004

IICrazy

taken away
Mar 28, 2003
976
0
36
Maple Valley, Washington
Aug 14, 2004
#1
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #1
Is there any cheaper alternative to go to rather than the paxton supercharger. That is the only one I can find for a carbed 302. any help is appreciated.
 

joeythesaint

New Member
Feb 9, 2003
402
0
0
Seattle
Aug 14, 2004
#2
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #2
I've been looking at that same option. Hot rodders, correct if I'm wrong, here, but I'm told that if you supercharge a 302 with a 6:71 series (or bigger) impeller, you'll just "drown" it -- there's not enough air going out to compensate for the air going in.

This is why I'm opting to go with dual 500cfm carbs -- 1000cfm (1000cfm wide open -- 2, 500cfm 4bbls on a progressive linkage) should be plenty; my understanding is that it'll likely be too much without headers. The engine has got to breathe at both ends.

In the meantime, I'm measuring and penciling, trying to imagineer a way to stuff a big-block -- ideally a hemi, which responds spectacularly well to supercharging -- into my II someday.

email me at joeythesaint@comcast.net . It looks like we're going in the same direction; I'm all for comparing notes.
 

Power Surge

Founding Member
Jul 20, 2002
1,516
4
38
Palm Coast, FL
Aug 14, 2004
#3
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #3
First of all, "cheap" and "supercharger" are not two words that usually go together. If you are not willing to spend what most blowers cost new, look for a decent used kit. You can use any centrifugal blower you want, all you need is the carb box to make it work.

You also can't just slap a blower on any motor. First, it must be healthy. You can put about 6 psi into a healthy stock 302. Second, you need to keep the compression under 9:1 or you won't really be able to use pump gas. If you want to make big power, you should build a blower motor, with fogred pistons, larger ring gaps, and decent flowing heads.

On my brothers pro 74, we just put his new setup in. It's a stock 92 5.0 (we'll build a 347 next winter) with an 8-71 on top. It will make about 5-6 psi. The car previously had dual quads, and ran like crap with them. Dual quads are too much for a stock/mild 302. Using the blower is different, because you are FORCING the air into the motor.
 

IICrazy

taken away
Mar 28, 2003
976
0
36
Maple Valley, Washington
Aug 14, 2004
#4
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #4
CobraIILover said:
First of all, "cheap" and "supercharger" are not two words that usually go together. If you are not willing to spend what most blowers cost new, look for a decent used kit. You can use any centrifugal blower you want, all you need is the carb box to make it work.

You also can't just slap a blower on any motor. First, it must be healthy. You can put about 6 psi into a healthy stock 302. Second, you need to keep the compression under 9:1 or you won't really be able to use pump gas. If you want to make big power, you should build a blower motor, with fogred pistons, larger ring gaps, and decent flowing heads.

On my brothers pro 74, we just put his new setup in. It's a stock 92 5.0 (we'll build a 347 next winter) with an 8-71 on top. It will make about 5-6 psi. The car previously had dual quads, and ran like crap with them. Dual quads are too much for a stock/mild 302. Using the blower is different, because you are FORCING the air into the motor.
Click to expand...


Thanks for the info. I have a 331 stroker kit that I want to build onto a stronger motor, As soon as I find a donor 5.0.
 

joeythesaint

New Member
Feb 9, 2003
402
0
0
Seattle
Aug 14, 2004
#5
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #5
> Dual quads are too much for a stock/mild 302.

What size quads was he running, and how were they linked? I've read of impressive results with baby quads -- 500's -- on 302's and 5.0's. I can see twin 750's being too much. I'm not debating you; I really want to know before I get too far into this project.
 

Power Surge

Founding Member
Jul 20, 2002
1,516
4
38
Palm Coast, FL
Aug 14, 2004
#6
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #6
joeythesaint said:
> Dual quads are too much for a stock/mild 302.

What size quads was he running, and how were they linked? I've read of impressive results with baby quads -- 500's -- on 302's and 5.0's. I can see twin 750's being too much. I'm not debating you; I really want to know before I get too far into this project.
Click to expand...

Hey was running dual 450s. It's was too much for a stock/mild 302. We wound up disconnecting the secondaries and then the car was much better. I think Dano reported that his dual quad setup was a PITA as well, maybe he'll chime in too.
 

perce111

Founding Member
Feb 29, 2000
632
0
16
Bellingham, WA
Aug 15, 2004
#7
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #7
Back to blowers
A real nice set up is the B&M [now Holley] unit
that they make for the SB Ford. Still must keep
8 or 9:1 compression.
I think from past experience it's not the size [dual 450s]
that is the problem it's multiple carburation that is tough
to syncronize.
Way back we built a tri carb unit for a hemi that ran
3 450 4bbl carbs modified. Talk about a pain to set up LOL.

Later
 

jeffnoel

Founding Member
Aug 31, 2002
1,638
5
37
Clovis, CA
Aug 15, 2004
#8
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #8
If 3 2-bbls are a pain, I guess I scrap my 4 Webers idea, lol.
 

parthos

Founding Member
Sep 21, 2000
529
1
0
Bismarck ND
Aug 15, 2004
#9
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #9
a key issue to keep in mind is pulley depth. I've a few different setups on other 302s, and 5.0s, and what is kinda scary is the pulley on the crank, it's pretty long.
 

Mstng2

Founding Member
Jun 27, 2002
789
5
19
- - Zion - -
Aug 16, 2004
#10
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #10
The holley baby blower (roots style) is very nice. I like the setup better and it doesnt require a lot of routing and plumbing. Drop it on, reconfigure the belts and VAVOOM!! Pricewise it's 6's gonna cost you about 3-5 K no matter which way you go. On carbs, most people go way too big on carb's I thought I would drop a 750 CFM on and go faster... lost 2 10ths in the 1/4...DOH!! too much gas! Anyway just my 2 pennies.
 
J

jim6577

Founding Member
May 9, 2002
70
0
0
Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Aug 18, 2004
#11
  • Aug 18, 2004
  • #11
this is a simple rume of thumb on carb size. Displacement multiplied by 1.5 to 2. Stay closer to the 1.5 to maintian fuel eficiency or get closer to 2 for maximum performance. This is for normally asperiated engines.
As for supercharging I have looked into several of the kits avaible for my EFI 5.0 and I don't think I have the belt clearence for any of them. Reacentely I saw a pair of headders that are reversed to come forward and mount a turbo from the 2.3's. I think I can build a twin turbo kit using salvage yard parts for under $1000.00. The cool part is that I won't have to worry about headder clearence problems because of my AOD.
 

98CobraClone

New Member
Feb 28, 2003
592
0
0
Ripley, Ohio
Aug 18, 2004
#12
  • Aug 18, 2004
  • #12
It's my understanding that procharger is testing a carbed setup. Once my V6 poops out, I might get the mounting brackets for a 302 and try it on the cobra. I already know that they produce and sell the carburetor hoods, but getting the piping to run through the SC, and intercooler to the carb would be a pain. At least with a big open grill area of the II, the intercooler would get plenty of air.

I'm just partial to intercoolers now. I'm pretty sure they can be mounted horizontal (parallel with ground) and get an air scoop for it to force ground air into it. I'm still playing with that idea.
 

kcobra302

Founding Member
Mar 22, 2000
864
1
16
latham ny
Aug 18, 2004
#13
  • Aug 18, 2004
  • #13
summit page 44 of the new catalog: weiand 174 procharger $2499.99
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Looking for a passenger side AC Compressor mount
  • mustangTodd
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
89
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Feb 10, 2026
mustangTodd
M
6
Motor ID
  • 65er
  • Mar 14, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
133
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Mar 14, 2026
Noobz347
P
Resolved Spark plug location
  • Ptanner
  • May 17, 2026
  • 2024+ (S650) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
1
Views
98
2024+ (S650) Mustang -General/Talk May 18, 2026
Ptanner
P
T
Service Fluid Recommendations for 2015 Paxton Supercharged GT
  • ThotTrap
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
113
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Aug 25, 2025
ThotTrap
T
C
Paxton novi 1200SL
  • Cambo617
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
136
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Oct 9, 2025
Cambo617
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?