sweet as hell mustang at the local car show

795.0pacecar said:
But you still cant explain why the side mouldings aren't on the car.

What is your point? What does it matter? It actually does not look that bad without them, better than I thought it would. Maybe they were missing when he bought the car. Or maybe someone stole them, or perhaps he got desperate and sold them for crack. It looks pretty obvious that the paint is not factory looking, and like stated earlier the sail panels are not colored like that stock, and do not normally match the cars paint. So the guy BS's about his car, he ain't the first. It is up to the listener to make of what someone says. Some people are full of s$%t completely, others just a bit. I just think your need for explanation on such a trivial matter is humorous. And to pick on the kid for the reasons you are make you look like the dumb one. The whole point....I think......of this thread was to show an awesome car done up with a huge engine with tons of power that you really don't see very often and show other Mustang lovers something interesting, instead its all negative meaningless crap. I could give a rats ass if the owner lies about his car but I did enjoy looking at the car and imagining the goofy grin I would have on my face if I were the owner of that car driving that car around in the country on a summer day on a smooth rode with no traffic and no cops and playing with the power of that car. ( but forever would I be yearning for the explanation as to the reason for the removed body moulding) Perhaps if a reward were offered for information related to the explanation for said moulding we could get to the bottom of this most important situation.
 
The point of the side moulding question, is there would be no reason to take them off if the car had the original paint. The kid keeps claiming the paint is original when it is clearly not. Yeah I look like an idiot why? Because I dont appriciate people who lie about their cars or people who dont listen. You sir are the one who looks like a moron since apparently you dont care if someone lies about their car to make themselves look better. Did I mention my car makes 8000hp to the wheels and is 100% street driven, I bet you think thats cool.
 
795.0pacecar said:
The point of the side moulding question, is there would be no reason to take them off if the car had the original paint. The kid keeps claiming the paint is original when it is clearly not. Yeah I look like an idiot why? Because I dont appriciate people who lie about their cars or people who dont listen. You sir are the one who looks like a moron since apparently you dont care if someone lies about their car to make themselves look better. Did I mention my car makes 8000hp to the wheels and is 100% street driven, I bet you think thats cool.

im not claiming it. he said it was and it looks org. under the hood. in the hatch everywhere.



if you dont like the car dont look at it and dont post. simple as that.
 
I am gonna have to go with pacecar on this one. The mouldings are a bitch to get off without scratching the paint so why would he do it unless he was about to paint it? The sail panels are also wayyyyyy too glossy, they should be a flat black. There are several ppl on here w/ 460s, the most popular probably being exploding gopher. I don't believe the 9XX HP numbers, now it would be more believeable if it was around 600 and 750 ft lbs with a stroker and ported heads, but just tooo unlikely. And whoever said the dyno thing is probably right, if he makes over 1000 hp why didn't he show it off with a sheet?
 
grey5.0beast said:
I am gonna have to go with pacecar on this one. The mouldings are a bitch to get off without scratching the paint so why would he do it unless he was about to paint it? The sail panels are also wayyyyyy too glossy, they should be a flat black. There are several ppl on here w/ 460s, the most popular probably being exploding gopher. I don't believe the 9XX HP numbers, now it would be more believeable if it was around 600 and 750 ft lbs with a stroker and ported heads, but just tooo unlikely. And whoever said the dyno thing is probably right, if he makes over 1000 hp why didn't he show it off with a sheet?


you tell me :nono:
 
ryan218 said:
im not claiming it. he said it was and it looks org. under the hood. in the hatch everywhere.



if you dont like the car dont look at it and dont post. simple as that.


It looks original because its a cheap paint job. This is a public forum, if you dont want oppinions dont post its THAT simple.
 
I've got to be honest, i like almost nothing about that car.
Don't like: the louvers, decals, cluttered looking engine bay for a carb'd car, rims, badges, blackouts, and what looks to be a lack of tailpipes on an Lx.

Pulls the wheels at 80mph, lol.
 
795.0pacecar said:
The point of the side moulding question, is there would be no reason to take them off if the car had the original paint. The kid keeps claiming the paint is original when it is clearly not. Yeah I look like an idiot why? Because I dont appriciate people who lie about their cars or people who dont listen. You sir are the one who looks like a moron since apparently you dont care if someone lies about their car to make themselves look better. Did I mention my car makes 8000hp to the wheels and is 100% street driven, I bet you think thats cool.
WOW 8000hp that IS cool. I bet you could really spin the tires on that car! Does it have a turbo?? It must to make that power. Do you need to run premium fuel for that? I bet it cost lots of money for gas!!! No?? Is it a big block? I bet it is. I thought 900hp was a lot, but 8000? that is crazy! Is it carbed? Do you have aftermarket control arms??? You should!!! I hope you have subframes in that car....welded too!! not bolted. I hope you upgraded your brakes....cause the older foxes have rather weak brakes and with all that hp you got. Scary!! I bet it pulls hard!!! I hope you have an adjustable pinion snubber. When your pushing those numbers you should.
And I never called you an idiot. I guess I was being a smart ass but I was defending the kid you seemed harsh. Like I said you listen to what people say and believe what you want. After rereading the whole thread the kid seems to be defending the bser's comments and seems to want to believe it is true. He will realize the truth eventually. Many people tell lies for many reason about cars, about woman, about what they did, or who, or what they saw, or have, or had or seen. That is my point. Why do people feel the need to do this I know not, as I do not engage in such behaviour. My point was it is a cool car, probably not 900hp, likely has more miles, certainly had paint, should have a cage, could have fancier guages, would look better with nicer seats, needs lx tips. I am sorry if I offended you I was just making fun of the fact you used the moulding as an argument. I knew what you meant. Of course there would be no logical reason to have the trim removed if the body was untouched and I know from experience that the areas behind the moulding would look noticeably different than the other areas, plus in the back behind rear wheelwell section there would be holes I did not notice this on his car but if they are not there body work was the reason. So sorry to rattle your cage. If you want I will edit my post on your request. And just so you know while your car is nice and maybe fast I think you are lying about the hp.
 
Im still young but I know ALOT more than you since I have built a trophy winning and magazine featured car, I know about body work, engine building, wiring, and just about everything you obviously know nothing about.

Nope Im not lying about the hp it makes 8000 to the wheels and has 2 2.3l turbo 4 cylinders. lol. Sorry I took alittle offense to your post. There wont be holes where the mouldings were on that car becaue its an 83. 79-84 the trim was attached only by double sided tape.
 
795.0pacecar said:
Im still young but I know ALOT more than you since I have built a trophy winning and magazine featured car, I know about body work, engine building, wiring, and just about everything you obviously know nothing about.

Nope Im not lying about the hp it makes 8000 to the wheels and has 2 2.3l turbo 4 cylinders. lol. Sorry I took alittle offense to your post. There wont be holes where the mouldings were on that car because its an 83. 79-84 the trim was attached only by double sided tape.

body work i dont think so dude. i did a **** load of the body work on the 86 and a little bit on the 88 of todd's

you know what. the only thing i dont know a ton about is the building of the enigne. and the wiring because I HATE WIRING and also

YOU have a dad who wanted you to have a mustang and wanted you to have a kick ass mustang to drive to school and who wanted to help you..

think about it. without your dad would you have that pace car :shrug:

my dad wishes i didnt like cars.

hmm a trophy winning and magazine featured car thats really cool but im 14 your 21 or 22 i belive so we will see where im at when im 22 so stick around.

by the time im 19 i WIll have a V8 in my mustang.

so you are... 7 or 8 years older then me. you started when you were 14 with your stang i have started mine now as i am 14. in a years alot can change

i dont think your dumb but i do think you should lay off a bit.

about the i have a featured car and you dont.

NONE i know of has a better looking mustang this mansonozz. and everyone knows that is my opion.( dont know how you fell but its a sweet stang )

just about every time i open a 5.0 magazine his car is in it :nice:

in 8 years we will see where im at then we will see who has and hasent had a nice stang.

give it 8 years. we will see.

think about where you would be without your dad'd help and aproval of the v8 for your stang

without my dad i wouldent have my stang right now.
 
grey5.0beast said:
Damn, calling pacecar stupid :nonono: he is a REALLY smart guy with one sick car, I'm sure he knows a **** load more than you, actually I'd bet my mustang on it.


i would to but im not stupid. for me being my age i can do more then most men can with a wrench and some elbow grease


and i know he has a kick ass car and is smart but i dont appreciate being called stupid because my no means am i.
 
ryan218 said:
about the i have a featured car and you dont becuase none had i nice getty up and go and show stang then sonic cherry :jaw:

What are you talking about? That's not his car, it's mine. And I didn't say anything to you except that dude w/the 83 is full of BS
 
mansonozz said:
What are you talking about? That's my car and I didn't say anything to you except that dude w/the 83 is full of BS

what i said is a complement dude as of the fact that you have one of the nicest fox convertibles with a very sweet engine. its shinny. anymore chome and you will need sun glasses to look at it. :nice:


do you mind if i use you as an example for something that you said a couple weeks ago? nonthing bad just somehting you said that caught my eye :shrug:
 
ryan218 said:
what i said is a complement dude as of the fact that you have one of the nicest fox convertibles with a very sweet engine.


do you mind if i use you as an example for something that you said a couple weeks ago? nonthing bad just somehting you said that caught my eye :shrug:


Go ahead, I still stand by it. Only difference now is that everyone is giving you crap because you're defending some clown who is completely full of it. :shrug: Just laugh and go make him make a fool out of himself, no need to argue about whatever.

And thanks. I thought you were bringing me in to the pissing match.