• Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech

t-5 first gear opinions

  • Thread starter Thread starter kcobra302
  • Start date Start date Sep 27, 2004

kcobra302

Founding Member
Mar 22, 2000
864
1
16
latham ny
Sep 27, 2004
#1
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #1
looking for comments or opinions from those of you with a t-5.

the transmissiom i am looking at offers a 2:95 and 3:35 first gear. there is a $200-$250 between the two. i was leaning towards the 3:35 but am having second thoughts.

the current incarnation of my king is leaning heavily towards straight line performance. running 3:55 rear gear(may change to 3:80 after the 5 speed is installed), 24.5 inch rear tire, the power band kicks in at around 2200 and is all done at 6200. the torque curve is pretty flat from from 4300 to 6200.

thanks, kcobra302
 

TheEvII

New Member
Sep 8, 2004
162
0
0
Lakemoor Il.
Sep 27, 2004
#2
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #2
If you'd like to know how each trans will work check out a website called, smokemup.com. You can compare all kinds of gear/trans ratios. This is a kick **s website for all kinds of conversion caclulators.
http://smokemup.com/
 

Vince

Vince the Fabricator
Founding Member
Feb 22, 2000
623
0
16
Vancouver, Canada
Sep 27, 2004
#3
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #3
The 2.95 is the more expensive one isn't it? I believe the 3.35 is the standard factory ratio, while the 2.95 is the Motorsport Z spec gear. The 2.95 has a higher torque rating, but it's up to you whether it's worth the extra money. I guess it depends how much torque you'll actually be able to put through the tranny. Performance-wise, I'm guessing traction will be your biggest problem, and 3.35s would make it even worse.
 

kcobra302

Founding Member
Mar 22, 2000
864
1
16
latham ny
Sep 28, 2004
#4
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #4
in a finely tuned state the engine should make right around 400ftlbs at the flywheel. keep in mind this number is based on 3 different computer software programs we used when we built the engine. only real world numbers at the track will confirm the output.

the transmission is rated at 450ftlbs. it is a custom built unit using parts from several aftermarket companies. yes 2:95 is the more expensive of the 2.

i will check out that link. again, thanks for your opinions.
 
A

a351Must2

Windsor II
Founding Member
Mar 12, 1999
4,317
0
0
Snohomish, WA
Sep 28, 2004
#5
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #5
My comments...I find that my Tremec's 3.27 1st gear + a 3.70 rear makes 1st gear useless at anytime on the street. I have to use 2nd gear to start if I want to pull into traffic quickly. If the car was drag only. the gearing would be great with slicks since it *could* launch quite hard if it had any traction. As it is, 1st is only good for ~30mph at 6K rpm with 26" tall tires.
 

TheEvII

New Member
Sep 8, 2004
162
0
0
Lakemoor Il.
Sep 28, 2004
#6
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #6
I find that my Tremec's 3.27
Click to expand...

You have a Tremec in your II? How does it fit. I noticed you have a 351 also so you must have done a little modifying for the engine but I'm curious how much modifying you have to do to get a Tremec in there with the 302.
 
A

a351Must2

Windsor II
Founding Member
Mar 12, 1999
4,317
0
0
Snohomish, WA
Sep 28, 2004
#7
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #7
TheEvII said:
You have a Tremec in your II? How does it fit. I noticed you have a 351 also so you must have done a little modifying for the engine but I'm curious how much modifying you have to do to get a Tremec in there with the 302.
Click to expand...

The only modifying done for the tremec was actually the same required for using a T-5 with a T-5 bellhousing. Driveline was shortened, shifter hole notched forward, driver's side header cut and re-welded to clear the clutch fork and cable, tranmission crossmember modified..
 

cobra_2_76

Founding Member
Aug 24, 1999
201
0
0
Norwalk, Ohio
Sep 29, 2004
#8
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #8
I'm using the 94-95 with the 3:35 first along with the 3:55 rears and as previously said 1st is almost useless for street use.

I would like to try going back to the 3:00 and check drivability for a comparison, but have other priorities right now.

Dave
 

kcobra302

Founding Member
Mar 22, 2000
864
1
16
latham ny
Sep 29, 2004
#9
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #9
thanks guys. i appreciate your comments
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
566
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
293
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
B
2001 roush stage 3 - sat for 5 years
  • Brando_05
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
252
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2025
Brando_05
B
H
New kid on the block
  • HydraX
  • Mar 22, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
17
Views
716
The Welcome Wagon Mar 22, 2025
HydraX
H
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?