• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

T on an NA

  • Thread starter Thread starter bluestallion
  • Start date Start date Apr 27, 2004
B

bluestallion

New Member
Jun 4, 2002
9
0
0
Apr 27, 2004
#1
  • Apr 27, 2004
  • #1
I have a perfect 2.3NA engine and don't want to completely swap it out. Would it work to take the Turbo components off a 2.3T and put them on my engine? or would that be insanely difficult and completely unworth the effort? thanks.
 
1

140cilx

Founding Member
Sep 7, 2001
2,385
0
0
GA
Apr 27, 2004
#2
  • Apr 27, 2004
  • #2
You'd still have to pull it and put in forged pistons from a turbo engine, change the exhaust valves for turbo exhaust valves that can stand the heat. Speaking of the head, you'd have to use a diegrinder to make the heart shape chamber into a kidney shaped chamber which will open it up a bit to lower compression - you need a chamber about 64 cc's. And you'd have to add an oil return to your pan. More often than not your n/a block doesn't have an oil return cast into it on the exhaust side behind the motor mount bracket.

Probably not worth it.
 
³

³à³

New Member
Apr 16, 2004
88
0
0
nowhere
Apr 27, 2004
#3
  • Apr 27, 2004
  • #3
What is the compression of a 87-90 2.3?

I think the factory pistons will survive as long as the tune is correct. Also the valves will work as Ive seen a N/A head be put on a turbo motor and work perfectly.
 

Bearded Forever

Type O Danzigative the Dark
Founding Member
Sep 4, 2000
4,927
3
98
Vinland
Apr 27, 2004
#4
  • Apr 27, 2004
  • #4
Tell us when he melts the valves.
 
G

gimpstang

Founding Member
Mar 4, 2002
81
0
0
Central, SC
Apr 27, 2004
#5
  • Apr 27, 2004
  • #5
You could put a turbo on the N/A motor but you would only be able to run about 6 to 8 psi max. anymore and you would break something. Why do you not want to swap a turbo engine? its really not difficult at all. plus there is enough information on the web to help fix any problems that you may come across.
 
³

³à³

New Member
Apr 16, 2004
88
0
0
nowhere
Apr 27, 2004
#6
  • Apr 27, 2004
  • #6
been in for 25000+ miles and still going strong.

What you hear and read on the internet isnt always the only truth and way of doing things. Get out and do things for yourself and you will see.
 
³

³à³

New Member
Apr 16, 2004
88
0
0
nowhere
Apr 27, 2004
#7
  • Apr 27, 2004
  • #7
That was my dad saying those comments.
 

89lx2.3

Founding Member
Oct 9, 2000
316
0
16
Hagerstown, MD
Apr 27, 2004
#8
  • Apr 27, 2004
  • #8
bhuff did this and it worked for a long while till the vac line came off the regulator and casued detonation... do a search there should be plenty of info on it... anyone know if bhuff changed his valves to turbo valves, or just left in the NA ones?
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Apr 27, 2004
#9
  • Apr 27, 2004
  • #9
³à³ said:
been in for 25000+ miles and still going strong.
Click to expand...

What? The valves? How many of those miles where with a turbo installed?
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Apr 28, 2004
#10
  • Apr 28, 2004
  • #10
I ran NA valves. It worked great too... but I never even thought about the possibility of blowing the vacume line off the fp regulator. Just one of those things...
As for turbo valves vs NA, the NA valves should hold up fine. If you have a safe tune for the cast pistons, then your EGT's arn't to high, and they shouldn't hurt the exhaust valve.
 
1

140cilx

Founding Member
Sep 7, 2001
2,385
0
0
GA
Apr 28, 2004
#11
  • Apr 28, 2004
  • #11
25k on an n/a engine that's been turbocharged is not a good enough answer. I bet there are guys on this board that put 36k on their cars a year.

I've got an exhaust valve I took out of a turbo head that has 2 large channels melted through it. Is it the OEM valve, or a poor rebuild where someone used an n/a valve? dunno.

I say just do it right the first time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Catch Can or not?
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
329
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 6, 2026
ctandc
C
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
504
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Hit something exiting
  • Creomod
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
466
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 17, 2026
General karthief
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
200
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
T5 5th gear 89 gt
  • mac_55
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
175
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 20, 2026
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?