• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Tb

  • Thread starter Thread starter justin82
  • Start date Start date Oct 18, 2017
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

justin82

Active Member
Sep 14, 2017
334
17
48
Oct 18, 2017
#1
  • Oct 18, 2017
  • #1
Will a 1991 Tb fit my 89?
 

justin82

Active Member
Sep 14, 2017
334
17
48
Oct 18, 2017
#2
  • Oct 18, 2017
  • #2
well, my project this weekend
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20171018-153808.webp
    555.5 KB · Views: 167

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
27,826
10,507
203
polk county florida
Oct 18, 2017
#3
  • Oct 18, 2017
  • #3
Yes
And have fun with the project
 

justin82

Active Member
Sep 14, 2017
334
17
48
Oct 18, 2017
#4
  • Oct 18, 2017
  • #4
I read on here someplace I should get new fuel injectors??...the TB is 70, the guy said I shouldn't need a new MAF...I've heard otherwise

thanks...and I will have fun
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
27,826
10,507
203
polk county florida
Oct 18, 2017
#5
  • Oct 18, 2017
  • #5
Stick to the stock 19's and you don't need to change you maf
 

justin82

Active Member
Sep 14, 2017
334
17
48
Oct 18, 2017
#6
  • Oct 18, 2017
  • #6
gotcha!
 

Dan02gt

mazing how much gas smell came from that tiny hole
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
909
415
113
Greenville, NC
Oct 18, 2017
#7
  • Oct 18, 2017
  • #7
That's a non EGR intake. Do you plan on eliminating the EGR?
 

justin82

Active Member
Sep 14, 2017
334
17
48
Oct 19, 2017
#8
  • Oct 19, 2017
  • #8
yea, I think so
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,147
17,843
224
Massachusetts
Oct 19, 2017
#9
  • Oct 19, 2017
  • #9
Use the explorer 19% injectors, and snag a 94-95 MAF + adapter
 

justin82

Active Member
Sep 14, 2017
334
17
48
Oct 19, 2017
#10
  • Oct 19, 2017
  • #10
94-95 MAF from explorer?....what is the benefit?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,147
17,843
224
Massachusetts
Oct 19, 2017
#11
  • Oct 19, 2017
  • #11
From SN95. It's 70mm in diameter and has the correct calibration curve to work with stock ECU and 19 pound injectors
 

justin82

Active Member
Sep 14, 2017
334
17
48
Oct 19, 2017
#12
  • Oct 19, 2017
  • #12
so don't use the 70mm TB I got yesterday?
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
27,826
10,507
203
polk county florida
Oct 19, 2017
#13
  • Oct 19, 2017
  • #13
There is a list of acceptable maf meters from 94-5 cars but I'm not finding it, I think @jrichker has the list and I'm confident he will post them in a few moments.
I have to reset an oil change moniter on a Mercedes that two shops are unable to do otherwise I would look more.
 

justin82

Active Member
Sep 14, 2017
334
17
48
Oct 19, 2017
#14
  • Oct 19, 2017
  • #14
no biggie, man
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Oct 19, 2017
#15
  • Oct 19, 2017
  • #15
-Use the 70mmtb
-19lb injectors from an explorer they have better spray pattern
-use 70mm MAF from a sn95 mustang 94-95 5.0 you will need an adapter to connect it to the airbox..
 

justin82

Active Member
Sep 14, 2017
334
17
48
Oct 19, 2017
#16
  • Oct 19, 2017
  • #16
GOT IT!!!...I u couldn't tell, I got confused somewhere along the eay...lol
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Oct 19, 2017
#17
  • Oct 19, 2017
  • #17
70mm TB is way too much for a stock motor.. You will not gain anything and possibly lose low end.
 

justin82

Active Member
Sep 14, 2017
334
17
48
Oct 19, 2017
#18
  • Oct 19, 2017
  • #18
should I just stick with my stock TB?
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Oct 19, 2017
#19
  • Oct 19, 2017
  • #19
stock intake? stock heads? cam? exhaust?
if yes then don't bother with a 70mm TB
 
Reactions: Noobz347

Boostedpimp

20+ Year Stangneter
May 8, 2003
1,451
493
154
NJ
Oct 19, 2017
#20
  • Oct 19, 2017
  • #20
I agree the 70mm will hurt some low end on a otherwise stock car. Just keep it packed away for when the horsepower bug bites and you start buying up mods
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Digital Tuning Going heads/cam/intake. Do I need a tune?
  • karhoot
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
382
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 14, 2026
karhoot
K
Engine TB Gasket Size?
  • robw13
  • May 15, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
106
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 15, 2025
robw13
X
Electrical Help me find a missing connection
  • Xavierg208
  • Feb 15, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
246
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 17, 2026
Mcmahst
8
Engine 86 GT heavy throttle pedal
  • 86 Convert
  • Sep 4, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
91
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 4, 2025
86 Convert
8
7
Engine Random hanging idle
  • 706 Saleen
  • Feb 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
426
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 19, 2026
86HO5.0
8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?