• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Termi vs coyote

  • Thread starter Thread starter Whitehorse88
  • Start date Start date Apr 24, 2018
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
W

Whitehorse88

New Member
Apr 3, 2018
24
1
3
Apr 24, 2018
#1
  • Apr 24, 2018
  • #1
Ok. I know this has most likely been discussed in many threads but I’m new to this an need opinions. Let me start by saying I’m a fox body purist. I love the sound and always have. We all new when a fox body was coming just by the sound. I just recently bought a fox coupe. Bought it cause the body was as straight as could be. Not happy with the mechanics but I’m anal with that stuff. I’ve always wanted to do a terminator swap cause it gives me that classic mustang sound with modern tech. That being said. I want to bring my fox to the modern era. Do I spend the extra cash on a termi set up or go coyote. I have seen so many opinions on this. Compression ratio with boost vs N.A. high compression engine. Has anyone out there compared the 2, physically? I don’t need super numbers. It’s going to be a street queen.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2016
27,832
10,509
203
polk county florida
Apr 24, 2018
#2
  • Apr 24, 2018
  • #2
Thats a tough one. Both power plants are light weight and the stock coyote is great n/a in a light weight foxbody. The terminator may need a little help to match the coyote hp numbers and there are some blower options to up the hp numbers, it may come down to money, the aluminum 4.6 with a blower (I like blowers, what can I say) may be a few dollars less to transplant.
Just my inexperienced opinion.
Like the old say'n goes: what kind of kool can you afford?

Ok, that's not an old say'n, I just made that up.
 
Reactions: FastDriver and krazedstang

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
Discordia
Apr 25, 2018
#3
  • Apr 25, 2018
  • #3
Wait for the release of the gen III coyote. Direct port injection.

Plus you won’t have to rebuild it right away since you know all the parts are new.

You’ll have to get the control pack too. That seems expensive on first view, but what will you do about running a terminator? You’ll use a 14-15 year old wiring system that might be damaged. Or you’ll have to buy new from Ron Francis or Painless, then you’ll want a new engine management system like PMS or Holley.

You’ll end up spending roughly the same amount for either swap. Except your anal side will be much happier with a brand new engine that has a two year warranty from the factory.

Just my thoughts.
 
Reactions: PlayboyRacer

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Apr 25, 2018
#4
  • Apr 25, 2018
  • #4
Mod motors sound different then pushrods, so the classic 5.0 sound you reference may not be what you expect. However, I think they sound awesome too. Hands down coyote, it is so much more advanced and capable then the old 4.6. The 4.6 can make tons of power, but the coyote is capable of more and will make more naturally aspirated then the stock termi.

Joe
 
I

I only know what I know

Member
Apr 17, 2018
88
4
8
Michigan
Apr 25, 2018
#5
  • Apr 25, 2018
  • #5
Davedacarpainter said:
You’ll have to get the control pack too. That seems expensive on first view, but what will you do about running a terminator
Click to expand...

It's only expensive until you compare it to the other controls available. You also have to consider what all comes with the control pack and what doesn't come with the crate motor or the changes that need to be made to a pulled motor like the fuel system. The control pack comes with the air intake and the drive by wire throttle which the others controls may offer as an add on cost. Furthermore the Ford control pack PCM is ready for systems like the AiM electric steering which none of the other controls offer. Start adding it all up and the Ford control pack is a pretty good deal.

Edit: Last I saw was the only control pack still available from Ford for the 4.6 is for the 3V motor.
 
K

kendawg73

Well-Known Member
Feb 5, 2014
474
102
64
Apr 25, 2018
#6
  • Apr 25, 2018
  • #6
Davedacarpainter said:
Wait for the release of the gen III coyote. Direct port injection.

Plus you won’t have to rebuild it right away since you know all the parts are new.

You’ll have to get the control pack too. That seems expensive on first view, but what will you do about running a terminator? You’ll use a 14-15 year old wiring system that might be damaged. Or you’ll have to buy new from Ron Francis or Painless, then you’ll want a new engine management system like PMS or Holley.

You’ll end up spending roughly the same amount for either swap. Except your anal side will be much happier with a brand new engine that has a two year warranty from the factory.

Just my thoughts.
Click to expand...

Not a fan of GDi.... without gas washing over the valves, the intake valves build up with carbon, since fuel never touches them... so the oily blow by just builds up on them and bakes on.... so as time goes on, your losing performance due to carbon build up, affecting airflow....
 
Reactions: 90sickfox

Hoytster

I don't dare do that to my Knob
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 30, 2002
1,069
700
164
Cornwall, PA
Apr 25, 2018
#7
  • Apr 25, 2018
  • #7
-Coyote motor is physically smaller than a 4.6 32V due to the cylinder head design being more compact. Block size is the same.
-In a coyote you are starting off with a MUCH better cylinder head design
-Coyote has a much more complicated valve train system (not a bad thing, just something to be aware)
-Coyote has more HP potential then the 4.6 due to the cylinder design, bay to bay breathing, and various other performance improvements
-Coyote block is stronger, though either would be just fine at the HP level you are describing
-EIther's stock internals will hold up to the power level you're describing (boosted or N/A)
-Coyote N/A is lighter than the 4.6 Termi motor stock, and makes more power
-It will sound different than a pushrod 5.0, buy either sounds great in a fox IMO
-Coyote offers better MPG and much better N/A low end torque due to the variable cam timing
-Coyote's rev higher than a termi

I will second that the ford controls pack is really a great deal. I have one sitting in my attic right now and am impressed with OEM quality and features. A coyote swap is not cheap though (to do it right and retain power steering, ect), so it all comes down to what you can find for what price, and what you want to spend. Either is a great platform.
 
Last edited: Apr 25, 2018

Hoytster

I don't dare do that to my Knob
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 30, 2002
1,069
700
164
Cornwall, PA
Apr 25, 2018
#8
  • Apr 25, 2018
  • #8
kendawg73 said:
Not a fan of GDi.... without gas washing over the valves, the intake valves build up with carbon, since fuel never touches them... so the oily blow by just builds up on them and bakes on.... so as time goes on, your losing performance due to carbon build up, affecting airflow....
Click to expand...

The Gen 3 coyote has both port and direct injection, which helps to eliminate this problem since it can leverage the benefits of either DI or port Injection. I know what you're talking about though (used to own a TSFI 2.0 Audi) and will never buy another DI only motor again.
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Apr 25, 2018
#9
  • Apr 25, 2018
  • #9
The direct port injection only systems ate having alot of issues. I work on them every day. If you own one be prepared to shoot walnut shells in the intake and exhaust ports to knock the carbon off the valve stems. Guess the engineers didn't think about that, or didn't care.

Coyote all day, my man ! .... or save money and throw a chevy engine in it. It's all in what you want.
 

7upstang91

10 Year Member
May 30, 2008
936
124
74
Florida
Apr 25, 2018
#10
  • Apr 25, 2018
  • #10
The coyote motor will out shine the terminator all day.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2016
27,832
10,509
203
polk county florida
Apr 25, 2018
#11
  • Apr 25, 2018
  • #11
Man that terminator just don't get no love!
i guess it's considered old school now
 

Hoytster

I don't dare do that to my Knob
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 30, 2002
1,069
700
164
Cornwall, PA
Apr 25, 2018
#12
  • Apr 25, 2018
  • #12
90sickfox said:
The direct port injection only systems ate having alot of issues. I work on them every day. If you own one be prepared to shoot walnut shells in the intake and exhaust ports to knock the carbon off the valve stems. Guess the engineers didn't think about that, or didn't care.

Coyote all day, my man ! .... or save money and throw a chevy engine in it. It's all in what you want.
Click to expand...

I really think they don't care, it's guaranteed return business for them. I couldn't believe the carbon buildup on the valves the first time I had the intake off of my 2.0 TSFI. I read somewhere that part of BMW's 30K service on one of their DI motors is to pull the head off and walnut blast the valves. That's just ridiculous, no engine in today's age should require a that type of service at 30K. That's just bad engineering IMO.
 
Reactions: 90sickfox
I

I only know what I know

Member
Apr 17, 2018
88
4
8
Michigan
Apr 25, 2018
#13
  • Apr 25, 2018
  • #13
I built the powertrain on a pre-runner for a friend and the F150 he started with had a 4.2. The 4.2 is a 6 cylinder, push rod engine made to match a lot of the modular's characteristics including a seamless interchangeable fit with the OHC modulars and even it weighed 20 lbs. more than the Coyote that replaced it.
 

Hoytster

I don't dare do that to my Knob
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 30, 2002
1,069
700
164
Cornwall, PA
Apr 25, 2018
#14
  • Apr 25, 2018
  • #14
karthief said:
Man that terminator just don't get no love!
i guess it's considered old school now
Click to expand...

I think the terminator is still awesome, even though it's 15 year old technology at this point. I will always have a soft spot for that motor. It's just hard to beat the capability of the coyote.
 
I

I only know what I know

Member
Apr 17, 2018
88
4
8
Michigan
Apr 25, 2018
#15
  • Apr 25, 2018
  • #15
karthief said:
Man that terminator just don't get no love!
i guess it's considered old school now
Click to expand...

Or there is no point in arguing? As Christian Koenigsegg said, the 4.6 is one of the few, rare sweet spot engines that doesn't produce the destructive harmonics that tear most engines apart when they're taken to that level few go. This isn't a direct quote but close enough to convey his sentiment when he beat out the Veyron for the production car speed record with the Ford 4.6 platform.

90sickfox said:
Guess the engineers didn't think about that, or didn't care.
Click to expand...

I really doubt that about the engineers. A better sentiment is probably along the lines of "the accountants and management," made the decisions about what was done.
 

67coupe

Founding Member
Apr 5, 2002
658
402
93
Huntsville, AL
Apr 25, 2018
#16
  • Apr 25, 2018
  • #16
As someone who did a termi swap, maybe I can provide some thoughts to consider.

Ask yourself these questions:

1). What’s your final power goal for the car?

Simple bolt ons will take a termi close to 500rwhp. Bolt on coyotes top out around 450 rwhp. The termi will have have instant torque while the coyote will be more of a high rpm power producer. If your looking for higher power levels, do the coyote swap and add a blower later as it will probably win the hp/dollar contest.

2). How much are you concerned with handling characteristics?

The termi adds ALOT of weight over the nose of the car. Handling will suffer. From what I’ve read, the coyote is pretty much the same weight as the 302. Something to note, sway bar modifications are required with the termi swap. The alt interferes with the drivers side mount bracket which must be cut off.

3). What accessories/features do you want to keep? (A\C, power steering, cruise etc)

This will be the case for both swaps but maybe a little easier with the termi due to the similarities with the two chassis. It is possible to have all accessories function on a termi swap. I’ve kept the fox dash, used the cobra cluster and have all accessories working, including the cruise.

The coyote will take more effort and money. From the factory, the coyote does not use a power steering pump and the a/c is mounted in a location that will not work in the fox. This means buying some kits to mount a pump and relocate the a/c.

More info here

https://www.americanmuscle.com/coyote-fox-swap-guide.html

All in all it comes down to your budget, power goals, and how ‘finished’ you want your car. You won’t be disappointed with the performance and feel of either engine. They both feel much more refined than the push rod 302.
 
Reactions: General karthief and I only know what I know

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,169
17,865
224
Massachusetts
Apr 25, 2018
#17
  • Apr 25, 2018
  • #17
I guess it depends on which coyote motor you get. An older F150 motor? Or an 15+ mustang coyote?

Stock f150 motor vs terminator? I'll take the supercharged 4.6L with a pulley, exhaust and tube and be happy with that whine
 

67coupe

Founding Member
Apr 5, 2002
658
402
93
Huntsville, AL
Apr 25, 2018
#18
  • Apr 25, 2018
  • #18
Mustang5L5 said:
I guess it depends on which coyote motor you get. An older F150 motor? Or an 15+ mustang coyote?

Stock f150 motor vs terminator? I'll take the supercharged 4.6L with a pulley, exhaust and tube and be happy with that whine
Click to expand...

Very true, which coyote engine used will affect immediate and future power levels.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m very happy with the terminator swap. 460 rwhp and 490 rwtq are a combination of additive and dangerous in a fox!
 

FoxMustangLvr

I love my Pimp
SN Certified Technician
Oct 14, 2012
4,968
3,514
204
Spokane, Wa
Apr 25, 2018
#19
  • Apr 25, 2018
  • #19
karthief said:
Man that terminator just don't get no love!
i guess it's considered old school now
Click to expand...
I'll take a Terminator, in a Terminator! Most badazz Mustang, period!
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,169
17,865
224
Massachusetts
Apr 25, 2018
#20
  • Apr 25, 2018
  • #20
I think 400HP is a nice comfy HP level in a fox. Youbstsrt going above that and things can go wrong fast.

I've driven s few 350-375HP combos and thought it was perfect for such a light car to have fun on the street
 
Reactions: General karthief
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
472
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
J
Fox body - godzilla, coyote, or 408w stroker - Best route for budget build?
  • jaygee15
  • Jan 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 30, 2025
2000xp8
G
New Owner: Very Clean 1991 GT Convertible. All original with 21k original Miles. How to make it better?
  • gvanginkel403
  • Oct 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2025
Jarhead67
J
M
Too much for me to repair in my current housing situation
  • My Drama Magnet 04 Gt
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
8
Views
250
The Welcome Wagon Apr 14, 2026
Noobz347
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?