• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Test drove a 05 GT for about 20 miles!

  • Thread starter Thread starter mach271
  • Start date Start date Oct 20, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
First Prev 5 of 5
J

Jpjr

New Member
Aug 5, 2004
142
0
0
Oct 22, 2004
#81
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #81
2112 said:
Why the hell are you guys comapring the $25K 05 GT to a $35K Cobra, or even the more expensive Mach? The 05 GT is the FASTEST car you can buy for the price period, what more do you want? Plus, the Cobra and Mach have the ugly ass last gen look that will never look as good as the 05.
Click to expand...

hey dude... you can take your retro GT and look cool next to a guy smiling in an M3 any day of the week. if i had wanted that look i would have waited another month for it.
 

thehemi

New Member
Dec 2, 2002
73
0
0
Texas
Oct 22, 2004
#82
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #82
CatmanJJ said:
Looks are subjective
Click to expand...

That is what people with ugly cars always say...

PS- Yes, I'm joking, I do love the look of the Mach 1s.
 

Emil

New Member
Mar 26, 2004
90
0
0
Barrington, Illinois
Oct 22, 2004
#83
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #83
And once again, HP does not mean much of anything as far as acceleration goes. Torque is the only thing that matters. HP is simply a mathmatical expression of torque. Dynos to not measure HP, they measure torque. Think of it this way. Torque is what makes your car accelerate. HP is what makes your car run at a steady speed.
Click to expand...

The torque/horsepower thing is interesting but how about an example:

1) 400 hp at 6000 rpm = 350 lb-ft
2) 500 hp at 8000 rpm = 328 lb-ft

Let's assume top gear going the same speed.
Car #1 with a 3.5 rear will have 3.5 x 350 lb-ft = 1225 lb-ft at the wheels. Since car #2 can run at a higher rpm it can run a higher gear, in this example for equivalent speed it would be the ratio of the rpms or 8000/6000. So car #2 can run a 3.5 x 8000/6000 or 4.66 rear to go the same speed. We can see though that 4.66 x 328 lb-ft = 1528 lb-ft at the wheels.
So yes, torque is what accelerates the car but hp determines how much torque you can get at the wheels.

Hope this helps.
 
M

mach1dsg

New Member
Sep 28, 2004
84
0
0
Orange County,CA
Oct 22, 2004
#84
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #84
351CJ said:
Look at my calculations above. I used 410 lb ft of torque for the Cobra.

And once again, HP does not mean much of anything as far as acceleration goes. Torque is the only thing that matters. HP is simply a mathmatical expression of torque. Dynos to not measure HP, they measure torque. Think of it this way. Torque is what makes your car accelerate. HP is what makes your car run at a steady speed.
Click to expand...

torque is not the only thing that matters, ask the m3 guys, you would be surprised
also, i wonder why the lt1's were not low 13 sec cars in stock trim????
tq would make you move, but hp would keep you moving... and the more you have... the faster you'll go ....
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Oct 22, 2004
#85
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #85
mach1dsg said:
torque is not the only thing that matters, ask the m3 guys, you would be surprised
also, i wonder why the lt1's were not low 13 sec cars in stock trim????
tq would make you move, but hp would keep you moving... and the more you have... the faster you'll go ....
Click to expand...

As far as acceleration it is torque. The reason why the M3 is so fast is it's very high red line.
 

Emil

New Member
Mar 26, 2004
90
0
0
Barrington, Illinois
Oct 22, 2004
#86
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #86
The reason why the M3 is so fast is it's very high red line.
Click to expand...
That's what I'm getting at, it's torque * rpm (* .00019) which is equal to horsepower.
 
B

BaronVonBigmeat

New Member
Oct 7, 2004
13
0
0
Oct 22, 2004
#87
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #87
A couple of good articles from modulardepot about why torque is only half of the equation:

http://www.modulardepot.com/?show=articlesdet&aid=44

http://www.modulardepot.com/?show=articlesdet&aid=46

Or if that's not enough, here's another:

http://www.yawpower.com/tqvshp.html

I think I will email him and ask him to cover the '05 vs. Mach 1 vs. Cobra thing in his upcoming article which covers specific engines.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
First Prev 5 of 5
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Strange steering/brake issue
  • Haxmaster
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
89
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 3, 2026
squeak93
E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
138
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
ejscarfo
E
T5 5th gear 89 gt
  • mac_55
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
199
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 20, 2026
Mustang5L5
G
New Owner: Very Clean 1991 GT Convertible. All original with 21k original Miles. How to make it better?
  • gvanginkel403
  • Oct 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2025
Jarhead67
J
P
2000 GT Random Power Loss
  • Pinellas50
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
306
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2026
Pinellas50
P
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?