• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

TFS-1 cam, GT40 heads and Speed Density

  • Thread starter Thread starter 68keyblr
  • Start date Start date Sep 5, 2007

68keyblr

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 17, 2003
946
20
49
Arizona
Sep 5, 2007
#1
  • Sep 5, 2007
  • #1
Just for the record, I thought I'd post the outcome of my build since the combo was a bit of a question mark.

I'm still running Speed Density (MAF conversion planned next weekend).

Here's my combo:

331
TFS-1 cam
GT-40 heads, ported
93 Cobra intake
9.75:1 compression
1.6 RR's
Smog pump deleted, new cats installed

When I researched this combo before building it, I found that the TFS-1 cam didn't play well with SD.

After sorting out a few normal bugs on first startup, it runs really well! Idle is a little lopey and surges a little between 800 and 1k rpm, but all things considered it pulls hard and runs much better than I thought it would with SD.

Hope this info helps some one out
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Sep 5, 2007
#2
  • Sep 5, 2007
  • #2
I wondered about that cam and speed density because they seem to be very pickey about which cam you run.
 
R

robertdale

New Member
Jan 31, 2002
382
0
0
kentucky
Sep 5, 2007
#3
  • Sep 5, 2007
  • #3
i installed the Trick flow top end kit on my 88 and the car run horrible. It would barely run unless you were wide open. Mass Air conv. fixed the car instantly. Maybe your combo was a little closer to stock as far as the SD computer was concerned
 

68keyblr

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 17, 2003
946
20
49
Arizona
Sep 5, 2007
#4
  • Sep 5, 2007
  • #4
robertdale said:
i installed the Trick flow top end kit on my 88 and the car run horrible. It would barely run unless you were wide open. Mass Air conv. fixed the car instantly. Maybe your combo was a little closer to stock as far as the SD computer was concerned
Click to expand...

Yeah I think that's probably true. The GT-40 heads aren't as big of a change as the twisted wedge heads.

Also I should note that I'm still running the stock throttle body so I've still got a bottleneck that's keeping airflow down.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 5, 2007
#5
  • Sep 5, 2007
  • #5
hard to tell without a dyno with A/F, but the cam may have lost just enough vacuum (casues SD to run richer) to make up the added fuel requirements of the added cubes.
 

68keyblr

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 17, 2003
946
20
49
Arizona
Sep 6, 2007
#6
  • Sep 6, 2007
  • #6
tmoss said:
hard to tell without a dyno with A/F, but the cam may have lost just enough vacuum (casues SD to run richer) to make up the added fuel requirements of the added cubes.
Click to expand...

That makes alot of sense
 

ras50gt

Member
Oct 25, 2005
200
2
19
Sep 6, 2007
#7
  • Sep 6, 2007
  • #7
Get some videos posted up! So what are your thoughts on the M&R block so far?
 

68keyblr

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 17, 2003
946
20
49
Arizona
Sep 6, 2007
#8
  • Sep 6, 2007
  • #8
ras50gt said:
Get some videos posted up! So what are your thoughts on the M&R block so far?
Click to expand...

I made the mistake of using copper header gaskets so I had huge exhaust leaks. Just got those switched out last night so I should be good 2 go for a video

M&R Block is looking good so far. No leaks anywhere, so I know the gasket surfaces are true. No problems whatsoever with the bottom end - no weird noises or anything like that. I'm going to do a leakdown test real soon, I'll post the results.

I noticed that they are getting $2,200 for the 331 short block now. It's not clear to me if it's the same thing I bought or if there's upgraded parts to account for the higher price.

I'll be working all weekend, so I'll post a video next week
 

91foxbodygt

Member
Apr 11, 2005
76
0
7
Sep 6, 2007
#9
  • Sep 6, 2007
  • #9
what brand and size pushrods did you use?
 

68keyblr

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 17, 2003
946
20
49
Arizona
Sep 6, 2007
#10
  • Sep 6, 2007
  • #10
91foxbodygt said:
what brand and size pushrods did you use?
Click to expand...

I used stock replacement FMS pushrods. I used an adjustable length pushrod to check for proper length, and it turned out stock length was correct. I believe it's 6.272" iirc
 

68keyblr

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 17, 2003
946
20
49
Arizona
Sep 6, 2007
#11
  • Sep 6, 2007
  • #11
UPDATE - fixed the exhaust leaks...stinkin' copper header gaskets! Installed a set of FelPro 1415's and they completely fixed the problem.




 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Sep 7, 2007
#12
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #12
Are you using Stage 8 bolts on the headers? Since I installed them I have had no issues with header gasket failures. I swear by those bolts and there locks.
 

68keyblr

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 17, 2003
946
20
49
Arizona
Sep 7, 2007
#13
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #13
86bluecobra said:
Are you using Stage 8 bolts on the headers? Since I installed them I have had no issues with header gasket failures. I swear by those bolts and there locks.
Click to expand...

I'm using ARP header bolts. I've have very good luck with them in the past.

The problem this time is the crappy copper header gasket right out of the box....it just plain wouldn't seal. The bolts were all nice and tight.
 
L

lang williams

New Member
Jun 11, 2003
567
0
0
cleveland, oh
Sep 7, 2007
#14
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #14
the specs on the tf cam is right at the limits of sd, and you have to drive the car some to let the computer adjust to the changes. here's a link on sd compatible cams and you can compare the cam you want to use to the compatible ones.

http://www.50tech.com/files/sd_cams_137.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine An engine building combo with stock Speed Density (SD) system
  • Mcmahst
  • Jan 14, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
950
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 15, 2025
Mcmahst
Engine Finishing up 331 build
  • RedFury5.0
  • Mar 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
621
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 20, 2025
RedFury5.0
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
518
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
907
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?