• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

TFS High Ports 51700002's or Edelbrock 6037's??

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mista Miller
  • Start date Start date May 8, 2005

Mista Miller

New Member
Apr 10, 2005
10
0
0
May 8, 2005
#1
  • May 8, 2005
  • #1
Need a lil' info here..... But I need to stay emissions legal
This is what i'll be running,stock displacement engine, Cobra intake, 70mm tb, 19' soon to be 24's, 73 mass air, flowmaster with equal length headers and an crane cams 2040(e-cam) Now should I go with the tfs highports, or eddy 6037's?? just asking cause I can get a good deal on both sets of heads...

Thanks
Colin
 

Mista Miller

New Member
Apr 10, 2005
10
0
0
May 8, 2005
#2
  • May 8, 2005
  • #2
anybody???

anybody????
 

Fishhawk

New Member
Jun 10, 2004
281
0
0
57
Michigan City, Indiana
May 9, 2005
#3
  • May 9, 2005
  • #3
Mista Miller said:
Need a lil' info here..... But I need to stay emissions legal
This is what i'll be running,stock displacement engine, Cobra intake, 70mm tb, 19' soon to be 24's, 73 mass air, flowmaster with equal length headers and an crane cams 2040(e-cam) Now should I go with the tfs highports, or eddy 6037's?? just asking cause I can get a good deal on both sets of heads...

Thanks
Colin
Click to expand...
If you need to stay emissions legal then the Edelbrock for sure. Not sure but I think the highport heads may be a little to much for a stock bottom end and an E-cam. Besides, the 6037 head is dyno matched to the E-cam. Look at the Edelbrock web sight and their Performer Plus package. The spec for the cam they use are the same as the E-cam. Of course if you notice my mods I might be biased.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
49
PA
www.rnhperformance.com
May 9, 2005
#4
  • May 9, 2005
  • #4
The highports are way to much head for that combo.

I would look into a AFR165 over the E-brocks if you can.
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
45
Kingston, PA, USA
www.cardomain.com
May 9, 2005
#5
  • May 9, 2005
  • #5
i agree with rick that the High Ports are gonna be too much for that setup. The 6037s will work nice, but if you have the cash, as Rick said, a set of 165s will work VERY nice.
 

Mista Miller

New Member
Apr 10, 2005
10
0
0
May 9, 2005
#6
  • May 9, 2005
  • #6
Thanks...

Thanks for the guidance boys, can't wait to make some power with my baby..
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
55
windsor, Canada
members.cardomain.com
May 9, 2005
#7
  • May 9, 2005
  • #7
I like the Eddy RPM heads...the springs are better, price is better, but flow is down from the AFR's. After having the Eddy's ported on exhaust side the flowed ALMOST as much as a set of AFR's but price worked out to be almost identical. Doing it all over again I'd have just gone straight to the AFR's..though at this point for me a swap wouldn't yeild any worth while advantage...don't skimp...save for the AFR heads.
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
May 9, 2005
#8
  • May 9, 2005
  • #8
Plus you need special headers for the high ports if im not mistaken.

The regular TFS Twisted Wedge is a good head too.I would consider them or the AFR 165's.
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
45
Kingston, PA, USA
www.cardomain.com
May 9, 2005
#9
  • May 9, 2005
  • #9
one of the things that wasnt listed in the thread was budget. you can get a very good set of used heads (TFS, edelbrock, even FMS stuff) at a good price. i think now its more of a question of how fast do you wanna go vs. how much do you have to spend.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
Progress Thread I'm restoring my dad's fox body and I have some questions regarding my engine restoration
  • Fitzjack
  • Apr 5, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
39
Views
7K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 10, 2021
Willybill32
MSpnp2 base tune review please
  • Trogdor
  • Nov 6, 2020
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
6
Views
3K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Apr 8, 2021
Trogdor
Engine Building My First Fox Engine. Need Build Advice.
  • SlugJones
  • Apr 14, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 17, 2017
SlugJones
H
New Member, New Project, Long Time Mustang Fan
  • hobbydad
  • Dec 10, 2016
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 16, 2017
FoxMustangLvr
What Exactly To Do To Get Into Low 13's
  • Btrainfiveoh
  • Aug 14, 2015
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 3 4 5
Replies
91
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2015
5.0Droptop
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?