• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

The SVO Lowdown...

  • Thread starter Thread starter joetrainer31
  • Start date Start date Apr 15, 2013
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
Apr 15, 2013
#1
  • Apr 15, 2013
  • #1
This is highly interesting and new to me even though this is probably old news to all of you. The car I just purchased (95 Mustang GT), seems to be part of a rarer dealer option called the "Mustang SVO GT-40 Package" part #M-9000-G41. I've heard rumors of this package before. I kinda feel like I found Bigfoot or something. Any comments from the mustang brain trust? Any additional history, etc?

Article: http://www.howstuffworks.com/1994-1995-1996-1997-1998-ford-mustang7.htm
 

tca7291

I can see your wieners.
5 Year Member
Sep 1, 2011
1,801
152
143
Raleigh, NC
Apr 16, 2013
#2
  • Apr 16, 2013
  • #2
Cool! Can you verify the stock changes? Different intake, aluminum heads, ect.?
 
Reactions: bologny pony

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
Apr 16, 2013
#3
  • Apr 16, 2013
  • #3
tca7291 said:
Cool! Can you verify the stock changes? Different intake, aluminum heads, ect.?
Click to expand...
tca7291, yes I can verify the changes. I'm on my ipad at the moment so I cannot post the pdf file I have which verifies the SVO GT40 changes. Later today, when I get onto my pc i'll post the pdf file. I can tell you that the package consisted of an SVO intake, GT 40 aluminum heads (per article posted above), 1.7 roller rockers, under drive pullies, and ring/pinion changes (355 or 373) for an additional $3000.

All things considered that it an awesome deal. Back in the day one would have rolled off the lot with a GT or Cobra that had significantly more horsepower/torque than fatory, could compete w/the F-body camaros, had full warranty, and was installed by Ford techs. That's awesome. Plus, there was also a super charger option for an additional $2-3k.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 16, 2013
#4
  • Apr 16, 2013
  • #4
joetrainer31 said:
tca7291, yes I can verify the changes. I'm on my ipad at the moment so I cannot post the pdf file I have which verifies the SVO GT40 changes. Later today, when I get onto my pc i'll post the pdf file. I can tell you that the package consisted of an SVO intake, GT 40 aluminum heads (per article posted above), 1.7 roller rockers, under drive pullies, and ring/pinion changes (355 or 373) for an additional $3000.

All things considered that it an awesome deal. Back in the day one would have rolled off the lot with a GT or Cobra that had significantly more horsepower/torque than fatory, could compete w/the F-body camaros, had full warranty, and was installed by Ford techs. That's awesome. Plus, there was also a super charger option for an additional $2-3k.
Click to expand...

I remember those kits.....I actually think I've still got my SVO performance book from that era kicking around somewhere. They were sold as a dealer option, or stand alone. You can actually still buy it today.

The kit consisted of

-GT-40Y Aluminum Cylinder Heads (not the revised GT40X heads)
-GT-40 EFI Lower Intake Manifold
-GT-40 EFI Upper Intake Manifold
-65mm Throttle Body
-Inlet Adapter
-Stainless Steel Shorty Headers
-Roller Rocker Arms (1.70:1)
-EFI Manifold Cover (5.0L HO)
-Strut Tower Brace
-Ring and Pinion Gear Set (3.55:1)
-Intake Bolt Kit.

There was also a GT40 engine package sold for the Fox 5.0L as well. I think the main difference was the use of Iron GT40 heads...and that kit was rated at approx. 270-275hp I believe?
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
Apr 16, 2013
#5
  • Apr 16, 2013
  • #5
Gearbanger 101 said:
I remember those kits.....I actually think I've still got my SVO performance book from that era kicking around somewhere. They were sold as a dealer option, or stand alone. You can actually still buy it today.

The kit consisted of

-GT-40Y Aluminum Cylinder Heads (not the revised GT40X heads)
-GT-40 EFI Lower Intake Manifold
-GT-40 EFI Upper Intake Manifold
-65mm Throttle Body
-Inlet Adapter
-Stainless Steel Shorty Headers
-Roller Rocker Arms (1.70:1)
-EFI Manifold Cover (5.0L HO)
-Strut Tower Brace
-Ring and Pinion Gear Set (3.55:1)
-Intake Bolt Kit.

There was also a GT40 engine package sold for the Fox 5.0L as well. I think the main difference was the use of Iron GT40 heads...and that kit was rated at approx. 270-275hp I believe?
Click to expand...
Yes, yes. I forgot about the headers. While I do not recall the fox body kits, I did just read that the SN95 kits were rated at 290hp. I'm thinking that the 290hp would equal the straight line performance of the fox body 275hp lol.

If you can scan your old SVO book detailing the package i'm talking about would you please send me a copy and/or post it here? I'll get you my pdf later (have class & work today). My email is joetrainer31@yahoo
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 16, 2013
#6
  • Apr 16, 2013
  • #6
joetrainer31 said:
If you can scan your old SVO book detailing the package i'm talking about would you please send me a copy and/or post it here? I'll get you my pdf later (have class & work today). My email is joetrainer31@yahoo
Click to expand...

That would require hours worth of digging.

I found this online....it's essentially the whole shooting match....

http://www.mustangsunlimited.com/itemdy00.asp?T1=M9000G41+01
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Apr 16, 2013
#7
  • Apr 16, 2013
  • #7
Were they also doing anything with the fuel system? 290 hp is reeeeeeealy stretching it for 19lb injectors without upping fuel pressure.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 16, 2013
#8
  • Apr 16, 2013
  • #8
NIKwoaC said:
Were they also doing anything with the fuel system? 290 hp is reeeeeeealy stretching it for 19lb injectors without upping fuel pressure.
Click to expand...

If I remember, the fuel system upgrades weren't sold with the kit, but I think 24lb/hr injectors and a 190lph fuel pump was recommended in the side bar?
 

JordanB21

Active Member
Feb 6, 2012
804
27
29
Killeen, Texas
Apr 16, 2013
#9
  • Apr 16, 2013
  • #9
That's pretty great! That package really closes the gap between the camaros and the mustang of the same years IMO.
Nearly 300 horsepower from factory on a light package.

Though it kind of belittles the 351w Cobra R.
 

earleys94gt

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
1,223
16
49
Ashley, Ohio
Apr 16, 2013
#10
  • Apr 16, 2013
  • #10
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
Apr 16, 2013
#11
  • Apr 16, 2013
  • #11
For the unbelievers here is a pdf from the state of CA Air resources board discussing the 50 state CARB certified "Mustang SVO GT-40 package." Furthermore, there is a link I added on the bottom of the second page for further reading. It is by the auto editors of Consumer Guide. It seems that Bigfoot, so to speak, is real. And i thought I just happened to have all Ford motor sport upgrades on my car.
 

Attachments

  • Mustang SVO GT-40 option.pdf
    Mustang SVO GT-40 option.pdf
    213.8 KB · Views: 749

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
Apr 16, 2013
#12
  • Apr 16, 2013
  • #12
NIKwoaC said:
Were they also doing anything with the fuel system? 290 hp is reeeeeeealy stretching it for 19lb injectors without upping fuel pressure.
Click to expand...
It is a stretch indeed. Although, on the 94-95 years it is super easy to address that with a fuel pressure regulator and maybe a 110-155lph pump. I ran 320+ on 155 w/o issue on my old fox body.
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
Apr 16, 2013
#13
  • Apr 16, 2013
  • #13
JordanB21 said:
That's pretty great! That package really closes the gap between the camaros and the mustang of the same years IMO.
Nearly 300 horsepower from factory on a light package.

Though it kind of belittles the 351w Cobra R.
Click to expand...
I'd personally contend that the package netted 320hp at the crank because their was a GT40 long block sold in the Motorsports catalog which consisted of the same components as the SVO GT-40 upgrade (i.e. y303 heads, SVO intake, headers**, stock cam, 1.7:1 rollers, under drive pullies**). However, my thoughts, at that point, would lean toward fuel delivery as NICwoaC pointed out.

** had to be added after long block purchase in order to reach 320hp
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 16, 2013
#14
  • Apr 16, 2013
  • #14
joetrainer31 said:
I'd personally contend that the package netted 320hp at the crank because their was a GT40 long block sold in the Motorsports catalog which consisted of the same components as the SVO GT-40 upgrade (i.e. y303 heads, SVO intake, headers**, stock cam, 1.7:1 rollers, under drive pullies**). However, my thoughts, at that point, would lean toward fuel delivery as NICwoaC pointed out.

** had to be added after long block purchase in order to reach 320hp
Click to expand...

The 320hp GT40 long block was essentially a stock production long block with GT40Y heads, B303/E303 camshaft. The long block was not offered with an intake manifold, roller rockers, exhaust components, etc. The horsepower figures were based on a carbureted intake and 600cfm carb with open exhaust. The engine was also non CARB compliant.

Here is an old add for the engine

http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts/part_details.asp?partkeyfield=27

JordanB21 said:
Though it kind of belittles the 351w Cobra R.
Click to expand...

The Cobra R utilized the non aluminum GT40 iron heads with 1.7 RR and marine camshaft M-6250-M50. This is what diminishes the 351W's horsepower capabilities compared to the Aluminum headed crate engine. Keep in mind though, the Cobra R made 365lbs/ft of torque at much lower levels than the 302 did.

Remember....all of these engines were built post 1992, when for changed the way they rated their engine horsepower (which to this day still makes little sense to me), so take their "factory ratings" with a grain of salt.
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
Apr 16, 2013
#15
  • Apr 16, 2013
  • #15
Gearbanger 101 said:
The 320hp GT40 long block was essentially a stock production long block with GT40Y heads, B303/E303 camshaft. The long block was not offered with an intake manifold, roller rockers, exhaust components, etc. The horsepower figures were based on a carbureted intake and 600cfm carb with open exhaust. The engine was also non CARB compliant.

Here is an old add for the engine

http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts/part_details.asp?partkeyfield=27



The Cobra R utilized the non aluminum GT40 iron heads with 1.7 RR and marine camshaft M-6250-M50. This is what diminishes the 351W's horsepower capabilities compared to the Aluminum headed crate engine. Keep in mind though, the Cobra R made 365lbs/ft of torque at much lower levels than the 302 did.

Remember....all of these engines were built post 1992, when for changed the way they rated their engine horsepower (which to this day still makes little sense to me), so take their "factory ratings" with a grain of salt.
Click to expand...
Gearbanger, thank you for the link. I see that the hp ratings were w/a E or B cam, and were calculated with EFI componants "320 HP with M-6250-B303 camshaft, 315 HP with M-6250-E303 camshaft when tested with Ford Racing induction kit, headers, and a 65mm throttle body not included". Very helpful link.

Mine car sounds like it has a stock camshaft unless, somehow, the 94-95 ecm can smooth out the idle -which I doubt.
 

Mintsick

10 Year Member
Jan 6, 2007
589
39
68
West Lafayette, IN
Apr 17, 2013
#16
  • Apr 17, 2013
  • #16
Sounds neat but where are the pictures of this actual bigfoot SN95?
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
Apr 17, 2013
#17
  • Apr 17, 2013
  • #17
Mintsick said:
Sounds neat but where are the pictures of this actual bigfoot SN95?
Click to expand...
Mintsick, do you mean that you want pics of my car? I can take a few for you if that is the case, but I warn you that its quite dirty from this So Cal pollen season, and I have not pressure washed the engine compartment yet. Lemme know...
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 17, 2013
#18
  • Apr 17, 2013
  • #18
Mintsick said:
Sounds neat but where are the pictures of this actual bigfoot SN95?
Click to expand...

Pics won't do you much good really. The car visually is the same as any other. What came under the hood is what was made it different.
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
Apr 17, 2013
#19
  • Apr 17, 2013
  • #19
Gearbanger 101 said:
Pics won't do you much good really. The car visually is the same as any other. What came under the hood is what was made it different.
Click to expand...
Right, agreed. I'll get some pics of under the hood. You will be able to clearly see FMS parts. However, the "GT" stamp on the heads is small and obscured by wires/hoses so i'm not sure if I can get a clean shot of it. I plan on replacing the lifters this summer so maybe when I take the valve covers off I can get a good pic of the numbers on the head.
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
Apr 17, 2013
#20
  • Apr 17, 2013
  • #20
So, it has a 96 Cobra hood (totally dirty though), Ford shorty headers, SVO intake, Ford under drives, Ford 65mm TB, can't show the Y303 heads yet, nor can I show the ring/pinion. The 1st owner of the car lived on an island off of FL, you can tell from the sand. However, I have not observed any rust on the car aside from the bolts for the strut tower brace (which has been changed to allow room for the manifold).
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Transmission for manual swapping a 1994-1995 GT
  • Rembrant
  • Jul 11, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
1K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 13, 2025
Rembrant
R
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
B
Price?
  • Blueinfan
  • May 27, 2022
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
5K
What is it Worth?!?!? May 30, 2022
7991LXnSHO
C
Fox Original Miles Or Rolled Over?
  • Cole's 1987 GT
  • Mar 20, 2015
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 21, 2015
Cole's 1987 GT
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?