• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

THERMOSTAT

  • Thread starter Thread starter StangCrazy302Gt
  • Start date Start date Nov 7, 2007
S

StangCrazy302Gt

Founding Member
Apr 25, 2002
282
0
0
New Jerzy
Nov 7, 2007
#1
  • Nov 7, 2007
  • #1
what is the diff between a 160 , 180 , 195??

i kno its a stupid question but i forget
 

Roland69

Sergeant Tangnet
Sep 17, 2005
2,867
2
58
Port Elgin, Ontario
Nov 7, 2007
#2
  • Nov 7, 2007
  • #2
that number is the the temp the stat opens
 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
Nov 7, 2007
#3
  • Nov 7, 2007
  • #3
192* or 195* is stock temperature. If you live in a cold climate (such as the Northeast), or if you like to switch out t-stats seasonally for late fall/winter/early spring, stick with this.

180* is the lowest temperature you'll want to go with in most cases. I usually run a 180* in my cars out here in the desert because it gives me a little extra margin of cooling in the 115*+ summers without making it TOO cold in the winter (because it only gets down to around the 60's most winter days). Again, if you live in any kind of a cold climate at all where temps get below 50 or 40* regularly, I wouldn't advise keeping one of these installed during the cold months - swap a 192 or 195* back in there until things get back up above 60 or 70* daily.

160* is overkill and almost the same as running without a T-stat, at all ... which sucks. Your car won't get up to proper operating temperature, your gas mileage will suffer, and your engine will suffer additional wear. If you're having cooling problems, then throwing one of these in there will NOT fix the issue - it's only a band-aid to cover a more serious problem in the system somewhere, one which is likely to only get worse with time. There are very few cases I can think of where running a 160* thermostat would make sense and/or be necessary.

Oh, and go with a failsafe t-stat whenever possible. If/when they crap out, they tend to stick open, which is far preferrable to having one that stays closed and overheats your motor in a jiffy.
 
S

StangCrazy302Gt

Founding Member
Apr 25, 2002
282
0
0
New Jerzy
Nov 7, 2007
#4
  • Nov 7, 2007
  • #4
thats what i needed to kno thanks
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Nov 8, 2007
#5
  • Nov 8, 2007
  • #5
StangCrazy302Gt said:
what is the diff between a 160 , 180 , 195??

i kno its a stupid question but i forget
Click to expand...

With respect to the first listing, 20 and 35, respectively.
 

black87ttop

Member
Oct 29, 2007
43
2
8
burlington,new jersey
Nov 8, 2007
#6
  • Nov 8, 2007
  • #6
I know people sat to stay away from a 160 and that they are bad and all, i dont run one, i run a 180. But we put a 160 in my buddies gt 40 h/c/i car and it runs great with it, knowing what i do now, i dont understand why it does. It has very hot air, hotter than the air in my car which has the 180 but thats becuase my heater core was bad. lol. But his car runs fine and doesnt throw codes. I dont know maybe his is just a freak.
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,389
3,536
233
Nov 8, 2007
#7
  • Nov 8, 2007
  • #7
HISSIN50 said:
With respect to the first listing, 20 and 35, respectively.
Click to expand...

Damn, beat me to it
 
S

StangCrazy302Gt

Founding Member
Apr 25, 2002
282
0
0
New Jerzy
Nov 8, 2007
#8
  • Nov 8, 2007
  • #8
HISSIN50 said:
With respect to the first listing, 20 and 35, respectively.
Click to expand...


i kno that... i just miss wrote my question... darkwriter77 answered it perfectly for me thanks
 
S

StangCrazy302Gt

Founding Member
Apr 25, 2002
282
0
0
New Jerzy
Nov 8, 2007
#9
  • Nov 8, 2007
  • #9
let me add another question, would a bad THERMOSTAT cauz the heat in teh car to be warm instead or hot... and my heater core isnt leaking so im guessing thats fine ( knock on wood)
 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
Nov 8, 2007
#10
  • Nov 8, 2007
  • #10
Maybe ... if it's a failsafe thermostat and/or it's stuck open full-time, thus preventing the engine from reaching full operating temperature.
 
S

StangCrazy302Gt

Founding Member
Apr 25, 2002
282
0
0
New Jerzy
Nov 9, 2007
#11
  • Nov 9, 2007
  • #11
guess its time to fix it just in case
 

bloopbloob

Member
Sep 27, 2006
578
4
16
Alberta
Nov 9, 2007
#12
  • Nov 9, 2007
  • #12
StangCrazy302Gt said:
let me add another question, would a bad THERMOSTAT cauz the heat in teh car to be warm instead or hot... and my heater core isnt leaking so im guessing thats fine ( knock on wood)
Click to expand...

it could mean its stuck open, or a previous owner may have installed too low of a tstat that doesnt allow it to reach higher op. temps...
 
S

StangCrazy302Gt

Founding Member
Apr 25, 2002
282
0
0
New Jerzy
Nov 9, 2007
#13
  • Nov 9, 2007
  • #13
yea i was thinking that when i was driving before.. i think im goin to go with the 195... seeming there arent any performance differences that i kno about
 

Bottomlesspit

I started the longest tech thread in the known uni
Founding Member
Jan 1, 1999
2,636
2
48
Del Rio, TX
Nov 11, 2007
#14
  • Nov 11, 2007
  • #14
I seem to be falling into the same situation as the last question.
Last month I installed a new water neck that had a tap for my mechanical water temp sender. I installed a new 195* fail-safe thermostat too. Since then, the water temp guage has shown a solid 185-190* during all drives. This is with the outside temps being anywhere from 60 up to 98*. Seems a bit cool to me. I had the exact same setup/guage in my 93 vert and I remember the temps were usually around the 200* mark.
I can't believe this beat up 92 hatch is running super efficient and keeping the temps that low on it's own. IS this what you mean by the stat might be stuck open? I know it went in correctly. I also checked it with water on the stove and it appeared to be working accurately.
What gives?
Ken
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Themostat
  • Mindseye007
  • Jan 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
653
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
86HO5.0
8
C
2005 Mustang GT Thermostat Housing
  • Cmrd
  • Apr 4, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
96
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Today at 6:13 PM
Cmrd
C
N
Thermostat housing
  • nataliaisafraid
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
181
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Apr 2, 2026
Cmrd
C
6
Tires
  • 65er
  • Dec 18, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
321
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
Realmongo
Fox Help
  • 93fox85
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
181
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 23, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?