• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Thinking about buying this intake. want some opinions!

  • Thread starter Thread starter sotexpowdercoat
  • Start date Start date Jun 17, 2011
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
S

sotexpowdercoat

New Member
Apr 27, 2011
16
0
0
Jun 18, 2011
#21
  • Jun 18, 2011
  • #21
Man yall are a tough crowd... Figured this sticking a lil through hood cut out would look bitchin!
 

tannerc91gt

This last 25% is foreign territory at this point
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
4,392
2,967
234
Indiana
Jun 18, 2011
#22
  • Jun 18, 2011
  • #22
If you dont buy it im gonna throw it on a stock 302. Hello 200hp/55tq
 
S

sotexpowdercoat

New Member
Apr 27, 2011
16
0
0
Jun 18, 2011
#23
  • Jun 18, 2011
  • #23
right!
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jun 18, 2011
#24
  • Jun 18, 2011
  • #24
sotexpowdercoat said:
Man yall are a tough crowd... Figured this sticking a lil through hood cut out would look bitchin!
Click to expand...

Just teasin ya some man...but seriously that's way too much intake unless you're running a crap load of boost or 11k RPM, or both.
 

ViperPunk

Member
Jul 30, 2010
195
1
18
idaho
Jun 19, 2011
#25
  • Jun 19, 2011
  • #25
i dont really know how good/bad it would be but that intake looks pretty sick and im not a bench racer so i have no other opinion than listen to what rick says cuz i have lurked enough to know that he aint a bs'er
 
S

sotexpowdercoat

New Member
Apr 27, 2011
16
0
0
Jun 20, 2011
#26
  • Jun 20, 2011
  • #26
tried but cant sign up for account there. Admin is blocking new registrations for some reason.
 

bentley429isBAC

10 Year Member
Jul 23, 2009
922
188
84
CT
Jun 22, 2011
#27
  • Jun 22, 2011
  • #27
Huh, might have to try to message him about it then. There was a lot of D bags that signed up and just didnt belong so they got banned, probably trying to avoid that.
 

Black1987

my wife Bedazzled my input shaft
15 Year Member
Jan 9, 2011
1,064
595
174
NC
Jun 22, 2011
#28
  • Jun 22, 2011
  • #28
If you're going for the awe factor, 6-71 blower does the trick. Just ask oldfox, that blower is just sexy. Though if you really have your heart set on the bbq intake then get it, looks sick. Better pics?
 
B

Boss 351

Here sthhhhhhhheeeve take a picthh of my man flowe
Jul 13, 2003
2,433
23
48
Canada
Jun 23, 2011
#29
  • Jun 23, 2011
  • #29
What were the engine specs that came off of and how fast was the car? It is different for sure... Why not a victor intake converted to EFI with an elbow and crazy TB?
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Jun 23, 2011
#30
  • Jun 23, 2011
  • #30
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Just teasin ya some man...but seriously that's way too much intake unless you're running a crap load of boost or 11k RPM, or both.
Click to expand...

That intake would do nothing past 7k NA.


Get a super vic, or a victor Jr and use a 4 barrel throttle body on it.
 
S

sotexpowdercoat

New Member
Apr 27, 2011
16
0
0
Jun 23, 2011
#31
  • Jun 23, 2011
  • #31
I can always swap to an edy super vic and elbow if its a Dawg. Low end shouldnt be much of a problem with this motor anyways. Just for sharts and giggles can somebody explain how this would be different than edy super vic/ or Hogan sheetmetal intake or simular style box high rpm short runner intake. As its very simular to a hogan if you cut the upper plenum off. Please explain why, and exactly More so how the upper plenum volume effects the torque curve? thought this would be more determined by runner lenght/shape/size etc. By stating that this should be used on forced induct only is agreeing that it would flow like a short runner intake(ie the ones mentioned above). By stating that it wont flow above 7k is the opposite. Im kinda confused and actually expected this kinda feed back. This is actually why i posted this in the first place. Someone explain why the upper effects the rpm range in which it makes torque if at all, and if it actually does then wouldnt all our cold air intakes, anderson power pipes etc. effect the rpm torque curve in which our engine make power. Seems like single planes on a Carb setup are the standard, but throw a throttle body on it and you better have forced induction(for short runners)...But then again i dont know *****, so thats why im asking...
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Intake
  • James S
  • Jul 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
191
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 12, 2026
James S
J
For Sale Trick Flow Box R Series Upper Intake w/90 mm Inlet
  • Habu135
  • Apr 30, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
1
Views
224
Engine and Power Adder Jun 11, 2026
Habu135
D
Question about EGR valve, replacement, and a part on the valve.
  • DPP
  • May 9, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
136
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech May 23, 2026
DPP
D
L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
221
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
581
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?