• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

thoughts on my engine combo

  • Thread starter Thread starter thexrcist68
  • Start date Start date Sep 24, 2006

thexrcist68

New Member
Apr 22, 2006
63
0
0
Spotsy County, VA
Sep 24, 2006
#1
  • Sep 24, 2006
  • #1
heres what i have planned for my new engine for my cougar
stock rebuilt bottom end 302
aluminum gt-40 heads 1.94/1.54
lunati voodoo cam 256/ 262, Lift .483/ .499
proform hei distributor
(performer rpm intake
holley 600 cfm vac. secondary carb and headers off my old engine)


what kind of hp numbers do you think ill see from this setup,
and also do you think ill see any piston to valve clearance problems with my stock pistons and those heads/cam
also any other comments/suggestions would be great
thanks in advance
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
Sep 25, 2006
#2
  • Sep 25, 2006
  • #2
What gears are in the car and what converter is in it/or are planning to run?

Either way, its a pretty small cam . . . probably better suited for a generic Performer. If you don't already have #61001, I would step up to the #61002 219/227 @.050 .499"/.522". The heads will static at around .530 if they are untouched and the intake will be better suited.

3.55s and 3000 stall converter would probably round it out.
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Sep 25, 2006
#3
  • Sep 25, 2006
  • #3
agree, need at least a little more cam to get more from those heads.
 

Vinyl66

Member
Mar 21, 2004
398
0
16
Sep 25, 2006
#4
  • Sep 25, 2006
  • #4
I'd go with a larger cam like the others have stated. Those heads will breathe much better than stockers so get a cam that will help get the most out of them.
Gears and converter will make a huge difference in performance. Even if you don't plan on racing it, those 2 items will give you great seat of the pants and tire burning performance (if that's what you are after ).
 

thexrcist68

New Member
Apr 22, 2006
63
0
0
Spotsy County, VA
Sep 25, 2006
#5
  • Sep 25, 2006
  • #5
alright i guess ill step up to the next size cam seeing as i havent ordered it yet , its got a 2500 rpm hughes convertor and 3.55s already so that parts taken care of,

so will my stock pistons work ok with the 1.94 intake valves in those heads
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Sep 25, 2006
#6
  • Sep 25, 2006
  • #6
Yeah, that's the wild card. If the pistons are cut for stock valves, you could run into trouble, esp. with a bigger cam. If you haven't purchased the pistons yet, you might opt for some with more valve relief. I'd feel more confident with 1.90I valves, but maybe someone here knows more about whether 1.94s will work.
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
Sep 25, 2006
#7
  • Sep 25, 2006
  • #7
There are too many variables, you will have to measure.

The clay method and the weak spring method are easy and well worth the time.
 

thexrcist68

New Member
Apr 22, 2006
63
0
0
Spotsy County, VA
Sep 25, 2006
#8
  • Sep 25, 2006
  • #8
57fairlane said:
There are too many variables, you will have to measure.

The clay method and the weak spring method are easy and well worth the time.
Click to expand...

can someone point me to a site that explains this in detail
and my only reason for trying to use the stock pistons is cuz theyre already in the engine and theyre in good shape so i figured id try to reuse them
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Sep 26, 2006
#9
  • Sep 26, 2006
  • #9
Which GT40 heads? X, Y or Z ?
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Sep 26, 2006
#10
  • Sep 26, 2006
  • #10
you'll probably be ok up to about .525 lift with the stock pistons and 1.94 valves but i'd still clay them just to make sure. if you do end up needing a little more valve relief in the pistons you can buy a tool (probably from comp cams) that you just use in place of an intake valve and chock up in a drill to cut a little more relief in the stock pistons. if you use a drill stop on the tool you can do all the pistons and not have to worry about having them rebalanced so long as you don't have to do a large cut.
 

thexrcist68

New Member
Apr 22, 2006
63
0
0
Spotsy County, VA
Sep 26, 2006
#11
  • Sep 26, 2006
  • #11
D.Hearne said:
Which GT40 heads? X, Y or Z ?
Click to expand...

Y303 from ford racing i found a good deal on a used set
 

thexrcist68

New Member
Apr 22, 2006
63
0
0
Spotsy County, VA
Sep 26, 2006
#12
  • Sep 26, 2006
  • #12
so basically this claying is puttin some clay on the top of the piston in the valve releif and installing the heads and baring the engine over then take the heads off and see where the valve contacts the clay?
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Sep 27, 2006
#13
  • Sep 27, 2006
  • #13
Here you go (found this in 5 seconds with Google, btw)

http://www.fordmuscle.com/fundamentals/pistontovalve/index.shtml
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Sep 27, 2006
#14
  • Sep 27, 2006
  • #14
Id say you would probably make 250-275 at the wheels with that engine combo
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
591
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
668
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
366
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
712
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Engine An engine building combo with stock Speed Density (SD) system
  • Mcmahst
  • Jan 14, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
892
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 15, 2025
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?