• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech

Throttle Body Spacer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eatchevysforlunch
  • Start date Start date Dec 26, 2016
E

Eatchevysforlunch

New Member
Oct 24, 2016
3
0
1
Dec 26, 2016
#1
  • Dec 26, 2016
  • #1
I have a 2010 Mustang GT and I'm considering getting a throttle body spacer to add a handful of horsepower/torque do I need to get the 1/2 inch or 1 inch? I'm mechanically inclined, what does the throttle body spacer kit do for the engine? Sound? ( have dual flow master 40 series with x pipe set up) is the $60 investment worth it?
 

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,734
3,179
203
Taylorsville ky
Dec 26, 2016
#2
  • Dec 26, 2016
  • #2
In my honest opinion-No,it's not worth the investment.. $60 bucks would be better spent towards a cold air intake,a drop in K&N filter or even better Headers, gears and a handheld tuner lol. Again none of this is a fact- just my opinion
I'm sure many others will pop in with better advice.
Like maybe this guy lol - @74stang2togo
 
Reactions: B.erazo712

Adieu

Easy there, this ain't a dating site.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 7, 2002
9,531
5,187
224
Dec 26, 2016
#3
  • Dec 26, 2016
  • #3
View: https://youtu.be/Uzju3xBFHaY
2-3 peak horsepower there, others reveal similar on the dyno. No, TB spacers aren't worth the money.

The problem is, you're trying to tune intake runner length on a plastic composite intake that has very few compromises in it's design. This isn't the old 5.0 pushrod days were the limitations of the aluminum casting process and others meant there were compromises.

Another benefit from the past that is lost on the modern engine is heat isolation. On TBI and carbureted engines, a spacer reduced vapor lock, on MPFI engines, it's not really a problem, and if it does occur, a spacer that never sees fuel won't help.

Damn, I must be helping or something, @RaggedGT is putting out the Bat-Signal for me!
 
Last edited: Dec 26, 2016
Reactions: RaggedGT

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,734
3,179
203
Taylorsville ky
Dec 26, 2016
#4
  • Dec 26, 2016
  • #4
74stang2togo said:
View: https://youtu.be/Uzju3xBFHaY
2-3 peak horsepower there, others reveal similar on the dyno. No, TB spacers aren't worth the money.

The problem is, you're trying to tune intake runner length on a plastic composite intake that has very few compromises in it's design. This isn't the old 5.0 pushrod days were the limitations of the aluminum casting process and others meant their were compromises.

Another benefit from the past that is lost on the modern engine is heat isolation. On TBI and carbureted engines, a spacer reduced vapor lock, on MPFI engines, it's not really a problem, and if it does occur, a spacer that never sees fuel won't help.

Damn, I must be helping or something, @RaggedGT is putting out the Bat-Signal for me!
Click to expand...
You offer good,detailed advice or recommendations with pics and videos- why wouldn't I put out the bat signal for ya
lol
 

Adieu

Easy there, this ain't a dating site.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 7, 2002
9,531
5,187
224
Dec 26, 2016
#5
  • Dec 26, 2016
  • #5
RaggedGT said:
You offer good,detailed advice or recommendations with pics and videos- why wouldn't I put out the bat signal for ya
lol
Click to expand...
Yeah, but sometimes I'm wrong.
 

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,734
3,179
203
Taylorsville ky
Dec 26, 2016
#6
  • Dec 26, 2016
  • #6
74stang2togo said:
Yeah, but sometimes I'm wrong.
Click to expand...
Ehhh,it's the internet-makes everything kinda correct.. lol
 

BlackBuggy

Active Member
Aug 6, 2011
223
12
29
Indiana
Dec 28, 2016
#7
  • Dec 28, 2016
  • #7
I remember I put one of those little "tornado" things in the intake on my old Maxima. It seemed like a good idea at the time although now I am not so sure about the science behind it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Throttle Body Spacer
  • dropteeth
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
195
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 2, 2025
nicholase
For Sale Trick Flow Box R Series Upper Intake w/90 mm Inlet
  • Habu135
  • Apr 30, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
1
Views
144
Engine and Power Adder Jun 11, 2026
Habu135
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
502
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Progress Thread 91GTstroked 90 7 up convertible build
  • 91GTstroked
  • Apr 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
279
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2026
91GTstroked
New build with terminator x tps and iac choices
  • DeathProof88
  • Jul 19, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 1, 2024
Jarhead67
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?