• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Time to upgrade exhaust

  • Thread starter Thread starter mhjo
  • Start date Start date Apr 29, 2011
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Aug 12, 2011
#21
  • Aug 12, 2011
  • #21
tx65coupe said:
I don't think its from the different diameter mid pipes or the H pipe. I can't believe that your having noise issue with Dynomax turbo mufflers and resonators. I know alot of people that have them with out resonators and they are pretty quiet. Are you sure they are turbo mufflers and not one of thier other lines?
Click to expand...

It has an unpleasant drone at 30 mph (3d) and 50 mph (Od). Sound like pulling up the 120hz lever on your HiFi equalizer.... (boooooooooooh)
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Aug 13, 2011
#22
  • Aug 13, 2011
  • #22
Thats weird. I had a similar issue with the Flowmasters I had, but have never seen anything like that with any type of turbo style muffler. Those VT mufflers are probably louder than the Super Turbos.
 

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Aug 14, 2011
#23
  • Aug 14, 2011
  • #23
How to get rid of the drone?
 

JonK

Member
Jun 6, 2007
276
0
16
Nashville (Smyrna), TN
Aug 14, 2011
#24
  • Aug 14, 2011
  • #24
Have you installed the VT's? I'm curious to see how you like them. I plan to get these for my car once it's running and would like to know how others who have them like them. I like the idea of a 'quiet' exh. with the ability to open them up with RPM.
Jon
 

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Aug 17, 2011
#25
  • Aug 17, 2011
  • #25
The VT's are last resort. Today we will open H-pipe, and open the holes in the two main tubes (they are very small) in order to increase crossover flow.

I will report how that works.


Another tip we got i n order to reduce drone was to move one of the mufflers a couple of inches forward so that they no longer align.
 

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Aug 18, 2011
#26
  • Aug 18, 2011
  • #26
Report fro mincreasing holes in H-pipe.

We cut off the H-pip (transverse pipe) and inspectes the holes in the main pipe. On the left tube the hole was 1 " diameter, on the other only 1/2 ".
We opened noth holes to match the diameter og the h-tube, and welded back in place. However, it did nothing to the drone, meybe even increased it.
So, I'm back to replacing super-turbos with "drone free" VT's..
 

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Aug 26, 2011
#27
  • Aug 26, 2011
  • #27
I can't help feeleing that the car became slower after replacing the shorty headers with HiPo manifold - am I dreaming?

Latest:

The Dynomax VT's have arrived at the post office, so they will be installed soon. I will report results then.
 

PoppyMod

Member
Jun 27, 2010
617
6
19
Severna Park, MD
Aug 26, 2011
#28
  • Aug 26, 2011
  • #28
mhjo said:
I can't help feeleing that the car became slower after replacing the shorty headers with HiPo manifold - am I dreaming?

Latest:

The Dynomax VT's have arrived at the post office, so they will be installed soon. I will report results then.
Click to expand...

Must be a nightmare! Unless your butt's has the sensitivity of a chassis Dyno LOL!
 
G

GTA6t7

New Member
Jul 8, 2011
8
0
2
West Virginia
Sep 5, 2011
#29
  • Sep 5, 2011
  • #29
Any update on the installation of the VT's? I'm considering the same set up.
 

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Sep 6, 2011
#30
  • Sep 6, 2011
  • #30
Report - Dynomax VT

1. They are almost totally silent at cruising
2. They do not drone at any rpm
3. They scream like a cat when you rev up


Possible drawbacks:

1. You will start hearing all sorts of sounds from the mechanical devices in your car

2. You might fall asleep while driving



Note: They are more silent than the Super-Turbos I had previously, both in 2 and 3 muffler setups.

Note 2: I still have the rear resonators on
 
G

gjz30075

Member
Aug 30, 2004
250
0
17
Roswell, Ga
Sep 6, 2011
#31
  • Sep 6, 2011
  • #31
Great to hear. I've been following this thread to hear the results of the VTs. Do you have any concerns about the internal mechanical stuff, spring, etc, wasting away over time and negating all what it is?
 

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Sep 6, 2011
#32
  • Sep 6, 2011
  • #32
Of course I do, and everyone is asking me the same question.

I guess the RD team at Dynomax did the same.

However, I read somewhere on the net that there was a guy who experienced rattle in the chamber, but that Dynomax offered return and compensation. Also, that there has been made improvents in the design since the first batches. Only time will tell weather the mechanism will last or not.
 

CochinoFilipino

Founding Member
Jan 14, 2002
171
2
19
CA
Sep 6, 2011
#33
  • Sep 6, 2011
  • #33
Just a note: From what I understand, a cross-over needs to be properly placed to be beneficial. And not doing so may even hurt performance.
 

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Oct 8, 2011
#34
  • Oct 8, 2011
  • #34
My friend who owns a '67 289 convertible has just replaced his mufflers with the VT's. He is
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Oct 8, 2011
#35
  • Oct 8, 2011
  • #35
CochinoFilipino said:
Just a note: From what I understand, a cross-over needs to be properly placed to be beneficial. And not doing so may even hurt performance.
Click to expand...

I don't see how improper placement could hurt, but it's been established it needs to be as close to the engine as possible. Placed back by the mufflers, it'd be useless.

Fuel-Injected Corvettes have the crosstube wrapped around the engine.

 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
1986 Convertable 5.0 GT
  • eneerg
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
4
Views
250
The Welcome Wagon Sep 24, 2025
Noobz347
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
560
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
T
For Sale 1990 GT Convertible Resto-mod
  • teneck83
  • Jun 19, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
395
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 19, 2025
teneck83
T
S
Engine 2003 Mach 1 Automatic Upgrades assistance
  • SJK1417M1AT
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
295
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 21, 2025
01SVTvertt
0
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
405
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?