• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Too much carb for my car?

  • Thread starter Thread starter samuraichamploo
  • Start date Start date May 24, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

samuraichamploo

Member
Mar 18, 2004
367
0
16
Beaumont, TX
May 26, 2004
#41
  • May 26, 2004
  • #41
your a scmuck.
 

408stroker5.0

The world would be a better place if all males jus
Mar 10, 2004
639
0
16
Bonnyville, Alberta, CANADA
May 26, 2004
#42
  • May 26, 2004
  • #42
saltymaz said:
your a scmuck.
Click to expand...

Your calling me a scmuck??? Ya... really good there man.... I'm not the idiot going around calling pushrod's, valverod's and lifter dogbones, slider block's. Are you really that dumb that you don't even know the proper term's for internal engine part's. I tried helping you earlier with recomending you use a 650 Speed Demon on your 5.0, and what do I get in return??? My recomendation was the only one on the whole thread that made any real scense and would most likely work the best for your combo, so let's forget all this BS and get back to what this topic is about....Carb Selection.
 
S

SmockDoiley

New Member
Jun 14, 2003
1,591
2
0
San Diego, CA
May 26, 2004
#43
  • May 26, 2004
  • #43
Ok, first you insulted my man, Yount, which pissed me off, but then you seemed to be cool again. But then you insulted me by saying your post was the best response, now you've really pissed me off. I think anyone that puts a 5.0 in a chevy, 240Z, or Volvo gets props in my eyes, though I'd prefer to have one in a 240Z. I dont agree with the Edelbrock because I've had them on 2 different cars and each time the thing ran horrible and I hate them so much. Not only are they a horrible performance carb, parts are limited for them, they run like crap, and you cant use them for blowthrough. I dont think you have any right getting pissy to anyone NEWB so I recommend cooling your jets. There is no question, the car needs a 600 to 650 cfm Holley or Demon. Whether he wants vac or mech. secondaries is more of a personal preference. The actual correct size for a 306 with 6000 rpm max, dual plane intake, and 85% VE is 542-677 cfms. The larger being more performance oriented, but anything in that range will work fine for his car. For great performance, perfect cfm for the specified range given above, and great streetability, and price, I recommend the Road Demon 625. It comes with fuel line, electric choke, vacuum secondaries, its cfm rating is perfect, and its cheap at $340.
 

SwAmPf0x

Founding Member
Dec 29, 2001
1,423
0
37
Hell Hole Swamp
May 26, 2004
#44
  • May 26, 2004
  • #44
393Bird said:
I LOVE my new Quickfuel carb

Click to expand...


I noticed the regulator piped directly to the carb, hope you got solid motor mounts on that thing.

Looks nice in there though
 

Attachments

  • fuelfitting2.webp
    75.1 KB · Views: 126

plastic_cow

New Member
Sep 10, 2003
146
0
0
Oshkosh, WI
May 26, 2004
#45
  • May 26, 2004
  • #45
Okay, I'd have to thank Mr Y for helping me a million times, however, I must respectfully disagree on the carb, my buddy ran a '85 carbed with an Edle carb, and it ran kinda crappy...

Please 408, keep the hating to a minimum... that man knows his ****
 

plastic_cow

New Member
Sep 10, 2003
146
0
0
Oshkosh, WI
May 26, 2004
#46
  • May 26, 2004
  • #46
393Bird said:
I LOVE my new Quickfuel carb

Click to expand...
That engine looks pretty tight...
 

Attachments

  • fuelfitting2.webp
    75.1 KB · Views: 124

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
May 26, 2004
#47
  • May 26, 2004
  • #47
Yikes! I try to choose my words carefully - although I'm not sure others always read them as carefully. I think I said "if it were mine" -- the implication is, of course, here's what I'd do. It's a forum - different opinions are what it's all about. I try to be respectful, and I learn a lot from you guys. I've been on the planet a few years, and during that time I've seen a lot more guys switch their street and street/strip cars from Holleys to Edelbrocks and be happy about it, than I've seen the other way around. BG makes a great carb - I doubt anyone would be unhappy with it.

408 - there's nothing I can add; your posts speak for themselves. This portion is particularly amusing...."My recomendation was the only one on the whole thread that made any real scense...." Wow - humility and irony. Some day perhaps you'll zero in on what's really important and wonder why you're making such a fuss about things. For what it's worth (little to you I'm sure), the last two outings with the car were Ford only events - the organizers are always excited to register me by the way - and I probably got more compliments on the manifold faceplate than on any other single part of the car. What are you complaining about anyway - the "V8" emblem came off an Explorer! Chill man, you're gonna explode.
 

408stroker5.0

The world would be a better place if all males jus
Mar 10, 2004
639
0
16
Bonnyville, Alberta, CANADA
May 26, 2004
#48
  • May 26, 2004
  • #48
MY I have to admit I was being an ass last night. Was having a really bad day, so today I'll lay off, and stop making a fool of myself. Sorry about the comment's I made toward your 5.0 as well, although I still have to say that salyzman is really a loser.
I've never been a big fan of Edelbrock carb's. But I do have to say that they are a great carb when it comes to ecomomy and reliability, but they are a little behind when it comes too true performance. They are not a bad buy if your on a strict budget.
Anyhow I will chill, so take it easy man and no hard feeling's I hope.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
828
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
D
First post 289 rebuild question!
  • Ddyer2868
  • Nov 24, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
269
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 5, 2025
rednotch
M
Too much for me to repair in my current housing situation
  • My Drama Magnet 04 Gt
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
8
Views
297
The Welcome Wagon Apr 14, 2026
Noobz347
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
894
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?