• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Too much lift?? Not enough piston to valve clearance??

  • Thread starter Thread starter 93 Stang 5.0 LX
  • Start date Start date Mar 7, 2004
9

93 Stang 5.0 LX

Founding Member
May 2, 2001
246
0
0
North Andover, MA
Mar 7, 2004
#1
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #1
Will i have any trouble with my new setup at the moment? I have stock pistons and heads with stock valve springs and a Trickflow stage 1 cam with .312 lift and i have 1.72 FRPP roller rockers. am i going to have any trouble with my piston to valve clearence? i just put my motor completely together out of the car and it slipped my mind to check piston to valve clearence. should i take it all apart and check or is the clearance going to be ok? thanks for your help!!
 

Sgt.5point0

Member
Jul 26, 2003
258
0
16
Rapid City, South Dakota
Mar 7, 2004
#2
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #2
There is a math equation to figure out your lift but damned if I know what it is, math was never my strongest suit. I'm sure theres some Stangers on here that know how to figure that out.

I don't know off hand what the size of the E7 head valves are, they may be small enough that you can get by. If you can't figure it out don't risk it, I'm going to be doing a H/C/I/TB/Inj/MAM/etc... change soon so I researched the ways to measure Piston to Valve clearance. Check this website out if you end up having to measure.
 
M

mustangrfast88

Founding Member
Sep 22, 2002
330
0
0
middletown ohio
Mar 7, 2004
#3
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #3
you will have to much lift and not enought clearance you will need to have the pistions fly cut or a different cam you shouldnt run much over .500 lift with the stock stuff, and the stage 1 cam is a .512 lift
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Mar 7, 2004
#4
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #4
Can't speak for sure as I didn't put my engine together, but I am running a Stage 1 cam with stock heads and do not have a problem. I don't have 1.7 ratio rockers though, and don't know whether or not my pistons were cut at anytime.
 
S

speed1972

Founding Member
Mar 13, 2002
891
0
16
Denver, CO - Buckley AFB
Mar 7, 2004
#5
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #5
according to summit, that cam is .499 intake and .510 exhaust with 1.6 rockers.

take that number and plug it into the equation:

cam lift x rocker ratio = valve lift

.312 x 1.72 = .537 intake
.319 x 1.72 = .548 exhaust

I don't believe you'll have a problem with piston to valve clearance, but you will have a problem with coil bind. The stock valve springs are not designed for that much lift so you'd have to change them. You'd be safer running this setup with 1.6 rockers and using TFS springs that are designed to fit the stock head without machine work....

Larry
 
9

93 Stang 5.0 LX

Founding Member
May 2, 2001
246
0
0
North Andover, MA
Mar 9, 2004
#6
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #6
speed1972 said:
according to summit, that cam is .499 intake and .510 exhaust with 1.6 rockers.

take that number and plug it into the equation:

cam lift x rocker ratio = valve lift

.312 x 1.72 = .537 intake
.319 x 1.72 = .548 exhaust

I don't believe you'll have a problem with piston to valve clearance, but you will have a problem with coil bind. The stock valve springs are not designed for that much lift so you'd have to change them. You'd be safer running this setup with 1.6 rockers and using TFS springs that are designed to fit the stock head without machine work....

Larry
Click to expand...

should i just run my stock rocker arms with my stage 1 cam until i can afford new trickflow heads? i think thats my best bet for now.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Mar 9, 2004
#7
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #7
Lots of interesting stuff here. First of all, the cam you've selected is designed to be used with other mods to the engine. It will likely make the overall performance of your stock headed engine worse, not better. Your stock valve springs probably won't properly control valve motion with the lobes on that cam - which means you'll probably experience valve float before you get to enough rpm to see any power increase. Additionally, with the 1.72 rockers, you may have a spring bind problem. That should have been checked before engine assembly. I think you would be much better off saving your cam install until you have the proper heads, intake and exhaust mods and then select the cam to match your components and your power requirements, usage of the car, etc.

As for clearance, it's a function of a number of things. With stock heads and valve sizes - and the piston reliefs, you'll probably find you have enough clearance. But the ONLY WAY to know is to measure it on your engine. There's a site listed above and I'll list another below. And, the way you posed your question, you seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding about what causes piston to valve interference (it seems others in the thread do as well). Peak lift has nothing to do with p to v clearance - the pistons are way down the cylinders when the valves are open to peak; no clearance problems ever at peak. Clearance is an issue during overlap - when the piston is passing through tdc between the end of the exhaust stroke and the beginning of the intake stroke as the exhaust valve is closing and the intake valve is just opening. So, commonly changed things that impact clearance are 1) heads with larger valves than the piston reliefs, or with valves positioned differently than the stock piston reliefs (tfs) 2) heads that have been milled 3) blocks that have been decked 4) different pistons from stock 5) cams with earlier opening intake valve timing or later closing exhaust valve timing - usually this means cams with more duration, more overlap or tighter LSA's. Because of the dimensional differences of every engine, when you start to measure things in hundredths and thousandths, no two engines are the same - even two with the same components. So other's experience with clearance in their engines won't tell you anything about yours. You have to measure to be sure. If you decide to run the cam with the stock heads - you're dealing with #5 above. If you change the heads later you add #1 to the list of reasons to measure your clearance.

You may find that you start it up and nothing bad happens. All that means is that you got lucky. You may still find that if you miss a shift and over rev it, that exhaust valves will hit the pistons. People may say it was fine in theirs, you should be ok. You take a big risk if you act on that. Just so you know the risks you're facing. Good luck with it.

http://www.geocities.com/jjonibones/PVC.html
 

bock

Founding Member
Jan 7, 2002
648
2
19
Montreal,Qc
Mar 9, 2004
#8
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #8
I run a f-303 with stock shortblock over .100 of clerance on both valves and on each heads, i used the modling clay method.

the f-303 have .512 of lift on exhaust and intake.
 
9

93 Stang 5.0 LX

Founding Member
May 2, 2001
246
0
0
North Andover, MA
Mar 9, 2004
#9
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #9
So do you think i would be alright to just use the trickflow cam with the stock heads and put the stock rockers on because i have no mode of transportation at the moment until i get the stang back together. I will be purchasing the trickflow trackheat heads and intake in the early summer. thanks for all your help
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Mar 9, 2004
#10
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #10
Bock - great that you measured; but the lift has nothing to do with your clearance. 93Stang - put the stock cam back in it till you take it down to do the heads. Then I know it will be alright; unless you're willing to measure clearance, you're just guessing.
 

bock

Founding Member
Jan 7, 2002
648
2
19
Montreal,Qc
Mar 9, 2004
#11
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #11
duration 226°
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Clearance
  • 1993mustang50
  • Apr 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
160
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
2000xp8
9
Does anyone else have a combo close to this
  • 90Stanger302
  • Dec 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
261
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 25, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
SOLD Sold.
  • TTSaleen
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
6
Views
294
Engine and Power Adder Jul 2, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
832
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Engine Forged flat top pistons from 5.0 fit a 351 build?
  • PonyGTrider
  • May 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?