• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Total Control Products Rack Questions??

  • Thread starter Thread starter wickedmach1
  • Start date Start date Dec 22, 2005
W

wickedmach1

New Member
Apr 8, 2003
376
0
0
Austin, TX
Dec 22, 2005
#1
  • Dec 22, 2005
  • #1
I have a 1970 Mach 1 and want to install a rack and pinion. It looks like TCP has the best bolt in rack. For those who have the rack on there car, how do you like the it? Any issues? I also need to know if I can expect any clearance issues with long tube headers? Thanks for your help.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Dec 22, 2005
#2
  • Dec 22, 2005
  • #2
Let see...in order asked...

It is a thing of beauty, you have to pay top dollar but worth it in my opinion.

No "issues" whatsoever, in fact the ease of install is one of the best things about TCP R&Ps. Total definition of "bolt-in", took less than an hour to install and I was in no hurry, took almost as long to remove the factory stuff. Very attractive design and high quality materials.

No clearance problems, in fact my manual rack has more room for headers thant the factory PS stuff it replaced...BY FAR!
 

4MuscleMachines

Member
Jul 20, 2005
417
1
17
South Texas
Dec 22, 2005
#3
  • Dec 22, 2005
  • #3
Ditto.
 

jerry S

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,365
1
0
52.22N 5.12E
Dec 23, 2005
#4
  • Dec 23, 2005
  • #4
4MuscleMachines said:
Ditto.
Click to expand...

I too have a TCP R&P. As for its plaudits, I refer to the comments made by the right honorable gentleman from Austin some moments ago.
 

RGS0907

New Member
Aug 21, 2003
429
1
0
New Jersey
Dec 23, 2005
#5
  • Dec 23, 2005
  • #5
What about Power?

Has anyone had experience with truly bolt-in power racks?
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Dec 23, 2005
#6
  • Dec 23, 2005
  • #6
RGS0907 said:
Has anyone had experience with truly bolt-in power racks?
Click to expand...
Not me, but the only difference would be routing the lines and mounting the pump...right?
 

Psydwaze

Founding Member
Oct 10, 2001
661
0
16
Sacramento, CA
Dec 23, 2005
#7
  • Dec 23, 2005
  • #7
The installation of the TCP power rack is identical to the manual with the following exceptions.

Steering shaft between u-joints is cut to a shorter length.
Pump is mounted to the driver side cylinder head.
Hydraulic hoses and ends must be custom fit and assembled. (masking tape, cut off wheel, vise)
Drill holes to mount external reservoir.
 
W

wickedmach1

New Member
Apr 8, 2003
376
0
0
Austin, TX
Dec 23, 2005
#8
  • Dec 23, 2005
  • #8
I am thinking about buying a TCP Power rack. Does the TCP rack have any problems you are are describing?
 

67Thunder

New Member
Jun 19, 2005
101
0
0
Vancouver, Canada
Dec 24, 2005
#9
  • Dec 24, 2005
  • #9
I am thinking the TCP rack looks like a nice future option, for me as well.

Not to hijack the thread, but how does the TCP rack compare to stock steering in ease of turing, and turning radius?

I have manual steering in our car now, but with the big block (FE) I am wondering if even the manual rack will be to tough to turn.
 

LONN17

Founding Member
Dec 1, 2000
135
1
17
Oceanport, NJ
Dec 24, 2005
#10
  • Dec 24, 2005
  • #10
Another Option

If you already have power steering but want to upgrade this seems like a good way to go.... http://www.speeddirect.com/index.aspx?nodeID=75
A friend of mine did this setup in his '66 vette and he loves it. Seems to be a little less money too.

Trevor
 
G

grego37

New Member
May 12, 2004
576
0
0
Fresno CA
Dec 27, 2005
#11
  • Dec 27, 2005
  • #11
TCP rack:
Great product
simple installation
good instructions, great tech support
excellent quality
 

Psydwaze

Founding Member
Oct 10, 2001
661
0
16
Sacramento, CA
Dec 27, 2005
#12
  • Dec 27, 2005
  • #12
67Thunder said:
...how does the TCP rack compare to stock steering in ease of turing, and turning radius?
Click to expand...

Rack and pinion offers a more direct transfer of motion/energy in that the steering shaft directly drives the rack gear/shaft and centerlink. If the rack system used the same overall steering ratio as the factory steering box, drag link setup the rack would require less effort to turn. The TCP rack uses a quicker overall ratio which reduces the mechanical advantage at the steering wheel. So effort will be higher but with the benefit of a tighter, quicker responding, steering system that has the ability to transfer road feel to the steering wheel normally lost through multiple pivot points and a slushy worm and sector gear box.

I've heard comments regarding turning radius go both ways. Most customers do not notice any increase in turning radius but some customers do. This could possibly be due to misadjusted tie-rods causing travel to be stopped by the steering stop in one direction and the racks internal stop in the other. Others may realize a difference from worn/bent factory steering stops that allow the OEM steering box to travel further than originally intended by Ford. The racks travel is internally limited to 6-3/8" at the centerlink. Measuring various vehicles showed factory travel anywhere from 6-3/8" to nearly 6-3/4". A properly installed rack should not cause a noticeable difference in turning radius.


67Thunder said:
I have manual steering in our car now, but with the big block (FE) I am wondering if even the manual rack will be to tough to turn.
Click to expand...

Power racks outsell the manual versions almost 3:1 overall and about 6:1 in big block applications specifically. We suggest manual racks be used with 'skinny' front tires in big block apps; drag racing or pro street style cars. It can be done but you would be much happier with a power steering system.
 
S

strange65

New Member
Dec 28, 2005
71
0
0
Jan 3, 2006
#13
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #13
What about the spindles can the original or granada be used?
 

RGS0907

New Member
Aug 21, 2003
429
1
0
New Jersey
Jan 7, 2006
#14
  • Jan 7, 2006
  • #14
LONN17 said:
If you already have power steering but want to upgrade this seems like a good way to go.... http://www.speeddirect.com/index.aspx?nodeID=75
A friend of mine did this setup in his '66 vette and he loves it. Seems to be a little less money too.

Trevor
Click to expand...

If I can find a true bolt-in replacement so that I can return the car to stock if I have to, then I'm ready to get one of these!
 
J

jmenke

Founding Member
Nov 8, 1999
211
0
16
Melbourne, FL
Jan 9, 2006
#15
  • Jan 9, 2006
  • #15
I have the TCP power rack on my '66.
I am using the stock 87-93 style PS pump.
It causes the rack to make noise, similar to water running through pipes in a house. Note that the noise IS NOT the pump, but it is a result of the pump.
TCP recommends the KRC pump, but there is not one available that fits the stock EFI brackets.
I have modified the pump internals twice, and I am getting close to getting this noise issue controlled.
I am disappointed in the fact that an aftermarket pump is suggested/needed and that is the only knock I have with this product.

Jim
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Take a look at my rack!
  • bicknell
  • Sep 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
627
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 13, 2025
Willybill32
Suspension 87 steering wheel slightly wobbles after new Rag joint install
  • R82148V
  • Jun 16, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
902
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 24, 2025
R82148V
H
Strange steering/brake issue
  • Haxmaster
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
55
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 3, 2026
squeak93
G
S550 Headers
  • gray owl
  • Feb 1, 2026
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
201
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Feb 1, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Question about a 460 swap
  • Showngo_
  • Oct 27, 2024
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
1
Views
224
Fox Engine Swaparoo Nov 9, 2024
89ripper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?