• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

Total Timing Mystery 1969 Mustang 302

  • Thread starter Thread starter YadiStang
  • Start date Start date Jun 12, 2017

YadiStang

Member
Sep 2, 2015
66
5
8
Eastern PA
Jun 12, 2017
#1
  • Jun 12, 2017
  • #1
I have a mostly stock 1969 mustang, base 302. Mid length headers, Wieand Street Warrior intake, Quick Fuel HR-580 carburetor. Stock distributor and coil.

I've been bitten by the timing bug and because I was intrigued, I started to study the timing curve. I even swapped the springs to bring the total timing in quicker. Mind you, I'm not really expecting anything great and it is just a therapeutic tinkering thing to me.

The car runs good but probably on the rich side. I've jetted down and messed with air bleeds, but I still get carbon deposits on my garage floor from the tailpipes (on startup). The 580 is probably too big (technically) but I'm determined to make it work.

The first thing that I discovered was that my vacuum advance was broken, the diaphragm leaking. I plugged the ported source on the carburetor. I'm not really worried about this for now since I believe the most obvious effect would be mileage. Again the car runs fine. I will fix it one day when I can find the correct part.

My question... My reluctor arm that is being used on the slot is 13L. That would be 26 degrees mechanical, correct? My initial is usually 8-10. Wouldn't this make my total 36 degrees? When I charted my curve with a timing light, my total was 43 degrees (all in by 3,000). Does this make sense? What else could be attributing to the total? Could my broken diaphragm/advance plate be moving during operation? In all honesty, I've already run a 12v bypass to the pink resistor wire (tied up to the side) and will be converting to a Pertronix.

I'm interested in anyone's theory as to where the extra 7 degrees of timing is coming from.

 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jun 16, 2017
#2
  • Jun 16, 2017
  • #2
YadiStang said:
The first thing that I discovered was that my vacuum advance was broken, the diaphragm leaking. I plugged the ported source on the carburetor. I'm not really worried about this for now since I believe the most obvious effect would be mileage. Again the car runs fine. I will fix it one day when I can find the correct part.

My question... My reluctor arm that is being used on the slot is 13L. That would be 26 degrees mechanical, correct? My initial is usually 8-10. Wouldn't this make my total 36 degrees? When I charted my curve with a timing light, my total was 43 degrees (all in by 3,000). Does this make sense? What else could be attributing to the total? Could my broken diaphragm/advance plate be moving during operation? In all honesty, I've already run a 12v bypass to the pink resistor wire (tied up to the side) and will be converting to a Pertronix.

I'm interested in anyone's theory as to where the extra 7 degrees of timing is coming from.
Click to expand...

you may have plugged the carb port for the vacuum advance, but did you lock out the vacuum advance plate? probably not, and i suspect that is where your extra 7 degrees is coming from.
 

YadiStang

Member
Sep 2, 2015
66
5
8
Eastern PA
Jun 16, 2017
#3
  • Jun 16, 2017
  • #3
I did not lock out the vacuum plate advance and suspected just as you describe - I wasn't sure how to do that. Now that I'm thinking more about this, it makes complete sense. Just out of curiosity, how do people lock out the plate?
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jun 17, 2017
#4
  • Jun 17, 2017
  • #4
you can glue it in place, or use a self drilling screw. or if the vacuum advance can can be opened up, you can use a spacer to lock it down so it cant move.
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Jun 19, 2017
#5
  • Jun 19, 2017
  • #5
I know "how" it's done, but what I can't figure out is "why" people do it for a street-driven engine.. My brother had a (supposedly) killer 406 ci small block Chevy built by a local engine builder that was a fan of this. Once we got the engine back in the car, it seemed to be a dog at all speeds and wouldn't rev to redline. I replaced the vacuum canister with an adjustable Crane part, then spent about an hour tuning it and the car felt like it picked up 100 hp! Plus mileage nearly doubled (9 mpg to 17 mpg)and it no longer had the part-throttle bog it had previously. But that's just my experience, I could be wrong.
 

YadiStang

Member
Sep 2, 2015
66
5
8
Eastern PA
Jun 19, 2017
#6
  • Jun 19, 2017
  • #6
I definitely would want it for my setup which is mostly stock. Soon I will be doing heads (afr165) and a mild cam, but still will use vacuum advance. With my recent posts, I was just learning as I go to see what is happening with my motor now. I actually just put a "stock look" pertronix distributor in the other day and that has the vacuum advance. I also learned a few other new things...such as, I had to change the steel gear for an iron gear, and apparently this new distributor does not have accessible advance springs. I haven't measured the curve and I'm hoping it its all in by 3,000 (for future considerations).

Do you prefer timed port or manifold vacuum?
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Jun 19, 2017
#7
  • Jun 19, 2017
  • #7
Your vacuum advance needs timed port, otherwise it'll get an erroneous signal if you use manifold vacuum.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jun 19, 2017
#8
  • Jun 19, 2017
  • #8
zookeeper said:
I know "how" it's done, but what I can't figure out is "why" people do it for a street-driven engine.. My brother had a (supposedly) killer 406 ci small block Chevy built by a local engine builder that was a fan of this. Once we got the engine back in the car, it seemed to be a dog at all speeds and wouldn't rev to redline. I replaced the vacuum canister with an adjustable Crane part, then spent about an hour tuning it and the car felt like it picked up 100 hp! Plus mileage nearly doubled (9 mpg to 17 mpg)and it no longer had the part-throttle bog it had previously. But that's just my experience, I could be wrong.
Click to expand...

YadiStang said:
I definitely would want it for my setup which is mostly stock. Soon I will be doing heads (afr165) and a mild cam, but still will use vacuum advance. With my recent posts, I was just learning as I go to see what is happening with my motor now. I actually just put a "stock look" pertronix distributor in the other day and that has the vacuum advance. I also learned a few other new things...such as, I had to change the steel gear for an iron gear, and apparently this new distributor does not have accessible advance springs. I haven't measured the curve and I'm hoping it its all in by 3,000 (for future considerations).

Do you prefer timed port or manifold vacuum?
Click to expand...

in the end i agree with these posts. unless you are building a race only motor, you need the vacuum advance for the street for best part throttle performance and fuel economy.

zookeeper said:
Your vacuum advance needs timed port, otherwise it'll get an erroneous signal if you use manifold vacuum.
Click to expand...

i agree with this also.
 

bartl

Active Member
Feb 4, 2001
218
8
29
West Rutland, Vermont
Jun 23, 2017
#9
  • Jun 23, 2017
  • #9
The timing can also be affected by wear to the breaker plate and the advance "post". It doesn't take much for 3* of distributor advance. FWIW, my '85 HO likes 44* total (8* initial and advance plate set on the 18L side...old OE dual point).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Weber Carburetor tuning help
  • SchwarzStock
  • Jul 6, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
90
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 19, 2026
SchwarzStock
Forced Induction Total Timing under boost
  • Dontknowchit
  • Aug 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
330
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 28, 2025
Dontknowchit
M
Inheriting (and likely restoration of) a 1965 Mustang
  • miniwheats235
  • Feb 17, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
259
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2026
Realmongo
G
Help with initial Microsquirt ignition setting
  • germain101
  • Nov 13, 2025
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
3
Views
577
Digital Self-tuning Forum Nov 15, 2025
Mustang5L5
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
903
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?