TPS is at .957 (Good or BAD)?

ARMAGEDON

Member

Apr 2, 2005

100

0

17

Apr 15, 2005

#1

• Apr 15, 2005

• #1

My TPS is at .957.

I was going to bump it up to .99, but the two bolts that attatch the tps are such a PITA to get to.

Would the extra effort to bump it to .99 really yield any more performance?


Thanks.

 

C

crunchie12268

New Member

Aug 4, 2004

599

0

0

Manhattan, KS

Apr 15, 2005

#2

• Apr 15, 2005

• #2

not any noticiable power, it is fine were it is, mine is at .91.

 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.

Nov 8, 2003

2,120

2

59

windsor, Canada

Apr 15, 2005

#3

• Apr 15, 2005

• #3

Nope don't touch it..the whole TPS at .99v thing is a load of garbage..anywhere from .85-.98v and your good to go.

 

ARMAGEDON

Member

Apr 2, 2005

100

0

17

Apr 15, 2005

#4

• Apr 15, 2005

• #4

DMAN302 said:

Nope don't touch it..the whole TPS at .99v thing is a load of garbage..anywhere from .85-.98v and your good to go.

Click to expand...

I have always heard the closer to .99 the better performance you get.
Where did you hear that between .85 and .99 is ok. Just curious.
Atleast I won't have to get to those stupid TPS bolts.

 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.

Nov 8, 2003

2,120

2

59

windsor, Canada

Apr 15, 2005

#5

• Apr 15, 2005

• #5

There is no performance gain to be had by screwing with the TPS..anything under 1.0v will be fine.

 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?

15 Year Member

Nov 29, 1999

31,179

34

129

Apr 15, 2005

#6

• Apr 15, 2005

• #6

as Derek said, the computer should zero out the baseline upon start up/throttle closing. either it can zero it out or it will be out of range and toss a code (the puter can adapt ~25%).

that said, i dont mind seeing people mess with it - people have idle surging issues, etc which were not necessarily foreseen when the E.M. was designed. so mess with it if you want.

BTW, Derek, you are starting to sound like S&2B's. J/K.