• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

tps reading: no lower than 1.4x volts

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blackened302
  • Start date Start date Oct 21, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Oct 24, 2007
#21
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #21
I see what you guys are saying but AFAIK, our TPS's are not supposed to be adjusted period. They should fall within the adaptive range when installed and that's it.

Adjusting has reportedly helped some folks (Nacho - TONS of fox guys do it too). It's just that it's not supposed to be needed. On foxes, they were not supposed to idle-surge but since they do, hokum like adjusting the TPS has helped folks.

I wasnt disagreeing with what has worked for you - just stating that you should not have to do it. And for guys with perfectly running cars, dont think you need to adjust the TPS to 0.96 volts because it's better. For those folks, the ratcheting and puter are working in synch properly.
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Oct 24, 2007
#22
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #22
thanks JT.

what do you mean when you say "ratcheting"? do you mean the sensor itself has a ratcheting mechanism, or do you mean how we can loosen up the screws and turn it manually?
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Oct 24, 2007
#23
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #23
Punisher302 said:
thanks JT.

what do you mean when you say "ratcheting"? do you mean the sensor itself has a ratcheting mechanism, or do you mean how we can loosen up the screws and turn it manually?
Click to expand...

Ratcheting is a term from the GUFB file. Basically it just means that the puter monitors the TPS reading and remembers the lowest one observed. Then it makes this the new baseline (artificial 0.0 relative-TPS-volts).
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Oct 24, 2007
#24
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #24
Didn't mean anything with my comment, just clearing it up that it did help ME. But that's a good piece of info, I didn't know we didn't HAVE to.
 

fastgtfairlane

New Member
Apr 7, 2006
266
0
0
Oct 24, 2007
#25
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #25
punisher i have an edelbrock elbow if you need it. do you have an egr setup now? if not my elbow would be perfect for you. the holes have been plugged. i will sell it to you for 50 bucks.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Oct 24, 2007
#26
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #26
I totally see your guys' point Nacho. I wasn't actually disagreeing but rather just being a PITA.

For a long time I've posted that I dont have an issue with people adjusting the TPS (the risk is breaking it). Even though the cars should take care of the baselining, some mods or tune issues can cause problems. Ford didn't give us adpative control to be nice - it was done to accomodate the tolerances in all the sensors being supplied by the various manufacturers on the assembly line. It just happens that the adaptive control allows us to squeeze some mods in, some of which cause idle issues and some dont.

What I really should have stressed is that if someone doesnt have any issues with the car, don't adjust the TPS just for the sake of doing-so.

Carry on.
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Oct 24, 2007
#27
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #27
Point taken Hissin...cheers to that beer.
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Oct 24, 2007
#28
  • Oct 24, 2007
  • #28
ah yes, thanks JT--that clears it up.

fastgtfairlane said:
punisher i have an edelbrock elbow if you need it. do you have an egr setup now? if not my elbow would be perfect for you. the holes have been plugged. i will sell it to you for 50 bucks.
Click to expand...
hmm.. how many millimeters is it? i'm working out a deal w/ someone else, but this is appealing as it already has the EGR capped off (which i'm not running anymore, so it's very convenient). PM me, thanks.
 

fastgtfairlane

New Member
Apr 7, 2006
266
0
0
Oct 25, 2007
#29
  • Oct 25, 2007
  • #29
hmm.. how many millimeters is it? i'm working out a deal w/ someone else said:
hey whats up man. its setup for 70mm tb currently. it can be bored out to a 75mm very easily though.
Click to expand...
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Engine Strange Noise
  • burntokita
  • May 8, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
403
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 11, 2026
keel
T
Fox 1993 FOX High Idle
  • TheJay806
  • Dec 24, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
37
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 15, 2025
Mustang5L5
94 TB & TPS with 89 A9L - can't get 0.98v
  • Wallyman
  • Jun 11, 2024
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
9
Views
1K
Other Auto Tech Jun 15, 2024
CAMTWO1070
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
725
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1999–2004 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
907
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?