• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Track times for trickflow h/c/i

  • Thread starter Thread starter sage2k
  • Start date Start date Apr 7, 2008
S

sage2k

Member
May 23, 2005
645
0
16
Baton Rouge, LA
Apr 7, 2008
#1
  • Apr 7, 2008
  • #1
I went to the track yesterday and ran anywhere from 13.5's to my new best of 12.97 @ 105.5 with a 1.77 60 foot.

Combo:
trickflow h/c/i kit
24lb injectors
75mm Tbody
lightning maf
mac longtubes / prochamber / magnaflows
aluminum driveshaft
kc clutch
mgw short shifter
3.73 gears
Steeda springs
Tweecer tuned by Stanger007

315/35/17 sumitomos for 13.5 runs
17inch MT ET streets for the other runs

two runs at 13.5 @ 105 with like 2.0 60 foots
then two 1.89 60 foots and 13.1x @ 105 runs
then a 1.77 60 foot with a 12.97 @ 105 run
then a 1.84 60 foot with a 13.0x @ 105 run

Im satisfied that i broke into 12's with basically no suspension except some lowering springs which arent made for dragracing.

Any input from other trickflow h/c/i users?


 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Apr 7, 2008
#2
  • Apr 7, 2008
  • #2


Props to ya!

Wes

P.S. Tuned to ~12.8:1 WOT, 32-34* total across WOT RPMs is where we left spark at
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Apr 7, 2008
#3
  • Apr 7, 2008
  • #3
Numbers are pretty good. The tune looks spot on! I'd look into stepping up to a 4.10 gear, that will help out.

I went 12.8 @ 107 with that combo years ago when I had it. That was with a smaller 65mm tb, shorty headers, self tune with a fpr/turning the distributer and 3,300lbs race weight.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Apr 7, 2008
#4
  • Apr 7, 2008
  • #4
What are your dyno numbers?

Times look very typical for an Sn-95 car. You could probably do a little better with practice, just by the MPH.

Foxes are lighter than an Sn-95 by about 150 lbs.

At that power level, the TB is ineffective for 300 RWHP.

I gained 1.3 MPH by rebuilding the 302, porting the restrictive Performer lower intake (matched to the AFR 165s), and swapping out rusted/smashed and one side of the H-pipe being smashed in about 50% with BBK Longtubes with matching H-pipe.

I gained more power up-top than anything, from the intake.

The one thing I will give to longtubes, is better sound, from my preference.
 

SublimeRT

Member
Jan 25, 2003
230
1
16
Clarksville, TN
Apr 7, 2008
#5
  • Apr 7, 2008
  • #5
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=VMTI_ym4S9U

That's an old friends car. Ran an 8.0 on that run with 28x12.5-15 ET Streets. He normally ran the car with a 150 shot, but that was an NA pass. The car had no AC, smog junk, egr, stereo, back seat, 1 Kirkey drivers seat, no spare/jack, other things removed, subframes, welded torque boxes, some aftermarket uppers/lowers, tokice 5 ways all around, 4 cyl fox front springs, MM C/C plates, battery in the trunk, 31 spline superior axles, 8 pt roll bar and some other things in addition to what's listed on there. He ran a little bit faster after getting things dialed in.....7.70s-7.80s on motor. Was a fun car....he let me drive it a few times.
 

drakesdad

Member
Jul 29, 2005
961
0
16
Oregon OHIO
Apr 8, 2008
#6
  • Apr 8, 2008
  • #6
good #'s....do have the Track or street heat? I'm going to order some ET's this week and get ready for Milan or Norwalk......got the new built trans in......gonna see if those 2 get me to 12.99..........
 
S

sage2k

Member
May 23, 2005
645
0
16
Baton Rouge, LA
Apr 8, 2008
#7
  • Apr 8, 2008
  • #7
street heat with 3/8th spacer to clear the VC's
 

drakesdad

Member
Jul 29, 2005
961
0
16
Oregon OHIO
Apr 8, 2008
#8
  • Apr 8, 2008
  • #8
Thanks Sam......we have close to the same engine set up.....you have the LT's and manual......I'll let you know when I go .....break something...lol
Will
 
S

sage2k

Member
May 23, 2005
645
0
16
Baton Rouge, LA
Apr 8, 2008
#9
  • Apr 8, 2008
  • #9
I was saying that too but I ran like a good 6 runs on those MT ET's and didnt break anything
They were fun to launch on, I dont see myself ever wanting to run street tires at the 1/4 again
 

StinkinLincoln

Member
Dec 9, 2006
240
0
17
Louisiana
Apr 9, 2008
#10
  • Apr 9, 2008
  • #10
woot woot! that was so much fun!
looks like i will be tearing mine apart, 1/2 of it anyway lol ...again...
it wont take long and i will have to blow past ya on the track
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

0
87 Mustang H/c/i At Atco 13.5@102 2.0 60' - Vid
  • 00whiteGTvert
  • Apr 20, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 21, 2014
00whiteGTvert
0
Found a stack of 1/4 Time Slips from 17 Years ago.
  • VibrantRedGT
  • Mar 26, 2012
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 7, 2012
YEAHLOH95
D
GT40 combo at the track
  • dtlionsfan
  • Apr 11, 2010
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 13, 2010
stykthyn
S
New best with S trim
  • sage2k
  • Mar 23, 2009
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
822
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2009
sage2k
S
  • Locked
1994 Mustang GT in NY H/C/I
  • 94gts
  • Jan 27, 2010
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
4K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Nov 8, 2010
94gts
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?