• Community Forums
  • Regional Forums and Event Information

TURBO SYSTEMS, WHO DO YOU LIKE?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DNA DOA
  • Start date Start date Feb 24, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

ASD

Banned
Aug 14, 2004
334
0
0
Beaverton,OR
Feb 28, 2007
#41
  • Feb 28, 2007
  • #41
AllFordPerf said:
Better be careful Pog, between Alans clutch and Johns trans you may catch a bum converter just by hanging out with them.
Click to expand...

If I remember right the last car I pushed in the shop was a AFP car at 11:30PM on a Saturday night. Don't worry I covered up his stickers with blue tape.
 
A

AllFordPerf

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
252
0
0
Vancouver,Washington
Feb 28, 2007
#42
  • Feb 28, 2007
  • #42
Well when you have more than 5 customers the odds are one will break eventually. It could have been worse he could have been stuck on a bridge or broke at the track.
 

ASD

Banned
Aug 14, 2004
334
0
0
Beaverton,OR
Feb 28, 2007
#43
  • Feb 28, 2007
  • #43
AllFordPerf said:
Well when you have more than 5 customers the odds are one will break eventually. It could have been worse he could have been stuck on a bridge or broke at the track.
Click to expand...

Wow....Someone head is getting big. Your starting to sound like another shop up there. You must not have much to do since you keep responding to these post?

I better go, I need to total a customers saleen today.
 

352Ford2

New Member
Oct 12, 2005
393
0
0
Seattle,WA
Feb 28, 2007
#44
  • Feb 28, 2007
  • #44
WaterPog said:
please show me an example of a car with too big of an intercooler.
Click to expand...

I think the easiest way to visualize this is with a very specific case.

Take an air to air aftercooler, fixed inlet temperature, and fixed ambient temp.
Eic= aftercooler efficiency
Tin= temp into aftercooler
Tout= temp out of aftercooler
Tamb= Ambient temperature

Eic= (Tin-Tout)/(Tin-Tamb)

Graph intercooler efficiency vs. size of intercooler given the stated constants. You will get an asymptotic graph as it approaches 100% efficiency (decreasing rate of return for what you are putting in). Assuming you picked appropriate numbers for the Tin and Tamb, you want to size your intercooler to the size just before the graph “flat lines”


It is true as you increase the size of your intercooler you are increasing the efficiency of the system (getting the outlet air temp closer to ambient temp) but at an increase in system (turbo) lag and pressure drop and once the graph “flatlines” you really are not gaining anything.
 

1-Slow5.0

New Member
Oct 13, 2006
0
0
0
La Center, WA
Feb 28, 2007
#45
  • Feb 28, 2007
  • #45
Gosh, I can't take this anymore...!!!

!@#$%&*

I think I need to go on a 90 mile test drive!

(OK, guys, you KNOW I'm SOOOO just kidding on that one... but I had to.... )
 

Jon

Founding Member
Nov 27, 1998
4,546
0
0
Canby, OR
Feb 28, 2007
#46
  • Feb 28, 2007
  • #46
352Ford2 said:
I think the easiest way to visualize this is with a very specific case.

Take an air to air aftercooler, fixed inlet temperature, and fixed ambient temp.
Eic= aftercooler efficiency
Tin= temp into aftercooler
Tout= temp out of aftercooler
Tamb= Ambient temperature

Eic= (Tin-Tout)/(Tin-Tamb)

Graph intercooler efficiency vs. size of intercooler given the stated constants. You will get an asymptotic graph as it approaches 100% efficiency (decreasing rate of return for what you are putting in). Assuming you picked appropriate numbers for the Tin and Tamb, you want to size your intercooler to the size just before the graph “flat lines”


It is true as you increase the size of your intercooler you are increasing the efficiency of the system (getting the outlet air temp closer to ambient temp) but at an increase in system (turbo) lag and pressure drop and once the graph “flatlines” you really are not gaining anything.
Click to expand...


With the volume of air that you're flowing the volume of the cold side is totally irrelevant, you're arguing miliseconds. As for pressure drop, you're assuming a fixed air volume going in and that's just not the way it works since the control system fights to maintain a fixed pressure at whatever point you take your reference signal from. The only realistic possible downside of putting in an intercooler that the math says is "too big" is the added weight, cost and/or effort to actually install it. There is a point of diminishing returns, but it certianly won't hurt anything hence my request for an actual example. Bottom line is you won't find one.

The math is great until you get to the real world and realise that it's only about 1/3 of what's really going on
 

WaterPog

Founding Member
Mar 12, 2001
2,201
0
0
Portland, OR
Feb 28, 2007
#47
  • Feb 28, 2007
  • #47
Jon said:
With the volume of air that you're flowing the volume of the cold side is totally irrelevant, you're arguing miliseconds. As for pressure drop, you're assuming a fixed air volume going in and that's just not the way it works since the control system fights to maintain a fixed pressure at whatever point you take your reference signal from. The only realistic possible downside of putting in an intercooler that the math says is "too big" is the added weight, cost and/or effort to actually install it. There is a point of diminishing returns, but it certianly won't hurt anything hence my request for an actual example. Bottom line is you won't find one.

The math is great until you get to the real world and realise that it's only about 1/3 of what's really going on
Click to expand...


That was me, not Jon.

sorry.
 

loud 95

New Member
May 29, 2003
562
0
0
Milwaukie, OR
Feb 28, 2007
#48
  • Feb 28, 2007
  • #48
352Ford2 said:
keep in mind their is such thing as too big of an intercooler (or aftercooler as they should be called )
Click to expand...

Well, I don't think that I could fit "too big" of an intercooler under the front fascia of my '95 GT. It is better to have an oversized intercooler than an undersized one. In my case, the intercooler is going to have to chill the charge for a 427ci engine, with a fair sized turbo. The stage 2 B&G kit is too small in every respect to support this endeavor. Their stage 3 kit is what I want, but it features an air-to-water intercooler. My plan for the car is to drive it to the track, race the hell out of it and then drive it home (assuming I didn't break anything). As such, I require an air-to-air intercooler. Correct me if I am wrong, but the requisite intercooler for this plan should qualify as, "big ass."
 

352Ford2

New Member
Oct 12, 2005
393
0
0
Seattle,WA
Feb 28, 2007
#49
  • Feb 28, 2007
  • #49
With the volume of air that you're flowing the volume of the cold side is totally irrelevant, you're arguing miliseconds.
Click to expand...

I may be misunderstanding you (please correct if I am), but if the volume difference is not significant between the inlet side and outlet side that means your aftercooler is useless (PV=NRT).


As for pressure drop, you're assuming a fixed air volume going in and that's just not the way it works since the control system fights to maintain a fixed pressure at whatever point you take your reference signal from.
Click to expand...


As stated above this is a very simplistic example meant to shed light on the thought process required to select an aftercooler, this quick calculation would only apply at a given engine rpm, load, ambient temp, etc.


The only realistic possible downside of putting in an intercooler that the math says is "too big" is the added weight, cost and/or effort to actually install it. There is a point of diminishing returns, but it certainly won't hurt anything hence my request for an actual example. Bottom line is you won't find one.
Click to expand...


Sorry, I am going to stick to the system lag and pressure drop issues, that’s just the way system cycles and fluid mechanics work. Wikipedia has a pretty good write up on thermodynamics and fluid mechanics:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermodynamics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_mechanics



The math is great until you get to the real world and realize that it's only about 1/3 of what's really going on
Click to expand...


While it’s true that things between theory and reality can get convoluted sometimes, if you want to optimize a process, it is the best way to get you in the ballpark close enough to test, just ask an F1 team engineer.
 

352Ford2

New Member
Oct 12, 2005
393
0
0
Seattle,WA
Feb 28, 2007
#50
  • Feb 28, 2007
  • #50
loud 95 said:
It is better to have an oversized intercooler than an undersized one.
Click to expand...



For us enthusiasts that generally “thumb” stuff, you are 100% correct.
 

WaterPog

Founding Member
Mar 12, 2001
2,201
0
0
Portland, OR
Feb 28, 2007
#51
  • Feb 28, 2007
  • #51
Yes, you did misunderstand. The volume of the pipes relative to the volume of air going through the pipes is so small that any change in "lag" due to increasing the pipe length or intercooler volume is going to be insignificant.

The best rule of thumb is "put in as big a cooler as you can fit and quit over thinking it."
 

loud 95

New Member
May 29, 2003
562
0
0
Milwaukie, OR
Feb 28, 2007
#52
  • Feb 28, 2007
  • #52
352Ford2 said:
For us enthusiasts that generally “thumb” stuff, you are 100% correct.
Click to expand...

I know one alternative is to use a smaller intercooler and utilize a water/methanol kit to bridge the gap, but I would prefer not to introduce yet another system into the car. We'll see.
 

352Ford2

New Member
Oct 12, 2005
393
0
0
Seattle,WA
Feb 28, 2007
#53
  • Feb 28, 2007
  • #53
loud 95 said:
I know one alternative is to use a smaller intercooler and utilize a water/methanol kit to bridge the gap, but I would prefer not to introduce yet another system into the car. We'll see.
Click to expand...

Corky Bell (a man that knows far more than any of us about this sort of thing) thinks water/meth injection area bandaid fix for an improperly designed system. I do not fully agree and think they do have their merits in certain situations, but I will say this: if your water injection system clogs and your tune depends on it...... BOOM!

and leaky systems can cause issues too.
 

WaterPog

Founding Member
Mar 12, 2001
2,201
0
0
Portland, OR
Feb 28, 2007
#54
  • Feb 28, 2007
  • #54
Methanol definately has a place, but not really as a cooling agent primarily. The guys who are making big power with methanol injection are using it to actually replace a large quantity of fuel under boost, sometimes as high as 50%, and taking advantage of it's much higher octane rating in addition to the cooling effect.
 

loud 95

New Member
May 29, 2003
562
0
0
Milwaukie, OR
Feb 28, 2007
#55
  • Feb 28, 2007
  • #55
352Ford2 said:
Corky Bell (a man that knows far more than any of us about this sort of thing) thinks water/meth injection area bandaid fix for an improperly designed system. I do not fully agree and think they do have their merits in certain situations, but I will say this: if your water injection system clogs and your tune depends on it...... BOOM!

and leaky systems can cause issues too.
Click to expand...

It does seem that many people (especially in the import world) are using water/methanol injection as a cheap means of making up for the lack of an adequate fuel system. It should be used by those who run their cars hard on the street with pump gas and want to run cooler while enjoying a higher threshold of boost capability and detonation protection. The only way I would run a water/methanol kit on the street would be if I had a means of monitoring the system to assure it is injecting properly. This is getting easier to do, as enough of the new stand alone systems have sensor input options for use in situations like this. One could certainly monitor the fluid level in the storage tank, as well as the pump voltage. Even so, there is certainly inherent risk involved any way you cut it. Once I get the car together, I would prefer trying some tuning on E85, over installing water/methanol injection.
 

loud 95

New Member
May 29, 2003
562
0
0
Milwaukie, OR
Feb 28, 2007
#56
  • Feb 28, 2007
  • #56
WaterPog said:
Methanol definately has a place, but not really as a cooling agent primarily. The guys who are making big power with methanol injection are using it to actually replace a large quantity of fuel under boost, sometimes as high as 50%, and taking advantage of it's much higher octane rating in addition to the cooling effect.
Click to expand...

Agreed. The best example that comes to my mind is Mark's supra from Torque Freaks. I remember two years ago at the dyno day when people got hit with a mist of methanol from his car. I don't recall where it was all coming out of, whether it had been a leaky sytem or simply exhaust emissions. I think he put down just shy of 800rwhp. Methanol in the eyes doesn't feel good.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
649
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
A
Engine Turbo 5.0 Mustang bad misfire at WOT
  • AwxyMoron
  • Apr 3, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
51
Views
9K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 5, 2021
a91what
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
78 V6 Turbo
  • jozsefsz
  • Sep 30, 2014
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
3
Views
6K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 26, 2017
Little eddie
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Community Forums
  • Regional Forums and Event Information
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?