• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Turbo V-6

  • Thread starter Thread starter spanky442
  • Start date Start date Feb 12, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
S

spanky442

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
250
0
0
Feb 12, 2004
#1
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #1
Why doesn't Ford build a supercharged or turbo V-6 Mustang?




 

The Brahma Bull

Founding Member
Aug 20, 2001
863
0
0
North Carolina
Feb 12, 2004
#2
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #2
Probably because the majority of potential buyers would rather spend the money on a V8 instead.
 
S

spanky442

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
250
0
0
Feb 12, 2004
#3
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #3
yeah but more people are saying bye to V-8 and going for cars with turbo V-6.
 

The Brahma Bull

Founding Member
Aug 20, 2001
863
0
0
North Carolina
Feb 12, 2004
#4
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #4
Not the kinda people that are the market for Mustangs.
 
S

spanky442

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
250
0
0
Feb 12, 2004
#5
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #5
I think they would do pretty well with a turbo or supercharged V-6. I personally would go for a V-8. But that could be an intermidiate between the V-6 and V-8.
 
S

Sir Hacksalot

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2001
363
0
0
Ankeny, IA
Feb 12, 2004
#6
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #6
If they would build a V6 that was as indestructible as the Buick Turbo 3.8 that was used in the Grand National/T-Type, it would be interesting, but I would rather have a torquey V8.

Hax
 
S

spanky442

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
250
0
0
Feb 12, 2004
#7
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #7
A turbo V-6 with a 6spd and IRS would be interesting.
 
Z

Z28x

New Member
Sep 19, 2003
644
0
0
Albany NY
Feb 12, 2004
#8
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #8
Most performance mustang people want a V8, plus we have the S/C Cobra for the Forced induction crowd.
 
S

spanky442

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
250
0
0
Feb 12, 2004
#9
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #9
So maybe they should drop the S/C Cobra and build a S/C V-6.
 

new22003

New Member
Jun 22, 2003
657
0
0
Missouri
Feb 12, 2004
#10
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #10
The hard core performance guys will turbo/supercharge a V8 anyway and they want the performance headroom a V8 offers.

The old SVO mustangs were turbo had great handling for the day, 4 wheel disk brakes, a better car than the same year GT in almost every way but they didn’t sell too well. Mustang has a loyal following and they know what they want V8 rear wheel drive.

The Ford Probe was supposed to be the new mustang but when people found out it was going to be front drive and a 4cyl people went nuts. There were petitions write in campaigns and everything. People said the mustang had to have a V8 and rear drive. Ford listened to the people and continued with the V8 rear drive format.

Here’s a quote from a car and driver article on the mustang

"A new platform and new sheet metal restored respectability in '79, but by the mid-'80s the product planners were contemplating infanticide once again: an all-new Mustang on a front-drive platform. With no V-8 engine. This heresy stopped only when then-president Donald E. Petersen was deluged with outraged mail from Mustang faithful, much of it, according to the folklore, using the same salutation: "Dear *******." Petersen was moved to rescue the Mustang from impending oblivion, and the front-driver went on to become the Ford Probe, since deceased."

It would be interesting to have a turbo 6 but I still wouldn’t buy one. Many posts above have said the same and the majority of mustang loyalist’s wouldn’t accept it. If someone really wanted a turbo 6 cyl, there would be more turbo kits and performance parts for the 3.8 out there. If ford offered me a 300 hp V6 versus a 300 hp V8 for the same price Ill take the V8.

Ford has to make money and building a turbo 6 would cost more than it returned. It might find a niche market but unless you are going all out on a image cars niche market cars don’t make sense for a large company.
 
S

sixtyfive

Member
Jan 9, 2004
157
0
16
Feb 12, 2004
#11
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #11
i agree with the guys, plus lots of people belive that a v8 with the same hoarse would outlive a v6 with forced induction

the 4.6 is a great engine, and mustang people dont want their cars to be like lots of other cars, fwd and/or v6
 
A

awalbert88

Founding Member
Aug 5, 2001
599
1
0
Lancaster, PA
Feb 12, 2004
#12
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #12
I wouldn't mind seeing a return of the Probe, but not at the expense of what made the Mustang great. The Probe was a decently handling FWD import slayer, but I think we won't be seeing a return of that vehicle unfortunately. It sure would be nice to have a proper two-door hatchback with a turbocharged 4-banger though (I don't consider the Focus ZX3 to be a proper hatchback..) to shut the SRT-4 guys up.
 
M

mp67

Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
392
0
0
Texas
Feb 12, 2004
#13
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #13
spanky442 said:
Why doesn't Ford build a supercharged or turbo V-6 Mustang?




Click to expand...

If you remember, they had a turbo 4 in 84,85, and 86 (SVO). I think it had 205hp and had great handling, but it only lasted three years cause it cost as much if not more than a GT.
 

SuperStang83

Founding Member
Mar 21, 2001
1,693
0
49
Boyertown, Pa
Feb 12, 2004
#14
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #14
Mustang buyers want a V8!!
 

(&)

Founding Member
Apr 18, 2002
140
0
0
Kansas
Feb 12, 2004
#15
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #15
The only practical reason I can think of to use a smaller FI engine is to improve weight distribution, and the new Mustang has perfect weight distribution with the V8.
 

The Iceman

Founding Member
Jan 26, 2002
323
0
0
Shelton CT
Feb 12, 2004
#16
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #16
Because the Barra 4.0 I6-T in the OZ Falcon XR6 produces more hp/tq than even the '05s 4.6 ---- 320hp and 325lb/ft

better engine, but Ford would never do it -- stupid choice by Ford in my opinion
more feasible would be the n/a I6 (244hp/275 lb/ft) instead of the danged V6 but again , Ford is stupid in that respect
 

(&)

Founding Member
Apr 18, 2002
140
0
0
Kansas
Feb 12, 2004
#17
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #17
In regards to the 4.0T, you could just add FI to the V8 and have more power. There really is no replacement for displacement.

Plus, people want the "Mustang sound", which can't be replicated by a 4 or 6 cylinder engine.
 
T

tjredgt2000

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2001
94
0
0
Feb 12, 2004
#18
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #18
The simple answer is Ford doesn't need one. They have V-8's instead.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Feb 12, 2004
#19
  • Feb 12, 2004
  • #19
The Iceman said:
Because the Barra 4.0 I6-T in the OZ Falcon XR6 produces more hp/tq than even the '05s 4.6 ---- 320hp and 325lb/ft

better engine, but Ford would never do it -- stupid choice by Ford in my opinion
more feasible would be the n/a I6 (244hp/275 lb/ft) instead of the danged V6 but again , Ford is stupid in that respect
Click to expand...

It may be a better engine. But try doing the currency conversion for the list price of that falcon. It's list price is 45,085.00 AUD. before any options.
Which converts to 35,632.71 USD. And for that price we have the Cobra which cranks out considerably more hp that 320.
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Feb 16, 2004
#20
  • Feb 16, 2004
  • #20
SVTdriver said:
It may be a better engine. But try doing the currency conversion for the list price of that falcon. It's list price is 45,085.00 AUD. before any options.
Which converts to 35,632.71 USD. And for that price we have the Cobra which cranks out considerably more hp that 320.
Click to expand...

But it ain't no Falcon

Back before our dollar got so strong against the US$, it used to be down around 52 cents for a long while, which would have made it a 22.5k car.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

I
Got my first and the top doesn't line with window
  • indy86
  • Dec 22, 2024
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
353
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 23, 2024
indy86
I
1979 Pace Car Build- #887
  • darryl27529
  • Aug 6, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
Willybill32
B
67 coupe 6 cyl. Carb too high hits hood, required carb,?has cooleed heater hoses on base below carb.
  • Brian S.
  • May 7, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
86
Classic Mustang Specific Tech May 7, 2026
Realmongo
F
Engine Blueprint Engine
  • Flyboy60
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
156
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 1, 2026
AeroCoupe
A
Help ID - Turbo GT, SVO differences
  • aldoelmalo
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
91
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
aldoelmalo
A
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?