• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Tweecer Fan Settings

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guero
  • Start date Start date Jun 15, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Guero

Active Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,148
0
47
Jun 15, 2007
#1
  • Jun 15, 2007
  • #1
How do they work on the Tweecer?? I mean their 2 on and 2 of I think. What does what to the fans???
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jun 19, 2007
#2
  • Jun 19, 2007
  • #2
I found this with the search keywords ... fan_high_speed_ECT1_on

The thread title is kinda misleading however

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=626948&highlight=fan_high_speed_ECT1_on

Grady
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Jun 19, 2007
#3
  • Jun 19, 2007
  • #3
have you seen this, Guero?
http://www.mustang-tech.org/wiki/94-95_Mustangs_Tuning_Cooling


can anyone using these settings described in the new wiki verify they are correct and functioning properly?
 

Dan95-5.0

Active Member
Jun 14, 2003
1,110
0
36
Manitoba, Canada
Jun 19, 2007
#4
  • Jun 19, 2007
  • #4
Punisher302 said:
have you seen this, Guero?
http://www.mustang-tech.org/wiki/94-95_Mustangs_Tuning_Cooling


can anyone using these settings described in the new wiki verify they are correct and functioning properly?
Click to expand...

good find there. also interested in finding the answer to the same question.

i'm worried about killing my fan with the highspeed.

what average temp. will the car run at with these settings?
 

Guero

Active Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,148
0
47
Jun 20, 2007
#5
  • Jun 20, 2007
  • #5
Those settings are for a 180 t-stat aren't they??
 

Guero

Active Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,148
0
47
Jun 20, 2007
#6
  • Jun 20, 2007
  • #6
Final, i read what you posted. But I want to know why you set them on those degrees. I dont get why theirs 2 on's for the high and low speed
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Jun 20, 2007
#7
  • Jun 20, 2007
  • #7
Punisher302 said:
have you seen this, Guero?
http://www.mustang-tech.org/wiki/94-95_Mustangs_Tuning_Cooling


can anyone using these settings described in the new wiki verify they are correct and functioning properly?
Click to expand...

I've run those settings for about two years in LA heat with no problems. Stock radiator, stock waterpump for half of the time (now on a Stewart Stage 1), 180deg thermostat.

Wes
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Jun 20, 2007
#8
  • Jun 20, 2007
  • #8
Dan95-5.0 said:
what average temp. will the car run at with these settings?
Click to expand...

It's hard to say how your car will be with how hot/humid the weather gets here.

In traffic sitting dead on the Interstate w/ 100deg my car runs about 188-190.

At the dragstrip hotlapping, it goes anywhere from 190-200 tops.

This is going off the ECT sensor's reading in my datalogs.

But 200 is about the hottest I've seen it get -- or to be more precise "RM" on the gauge.

Oh yeah, I run around a 70/30-60/40 water/coolant mix in the summer.

Wes

EDIT: Last thing, I have an automatic with 3000 stall. Using the stock cooler in the radiator and then running to a large B&M stacked plate cooler sitting in front and to the left of the radiator. Not sure how that plays into heating/cooling - I didn't notice a difference in engine coolant temps when it went on, but wanted to give you every possible idea of what my setup consists of.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jun 20, 2007
#9
  • Jun 20, 2007
  • #9
Guero said:
Final, i read what you posted. But I want to know why you set them on those degrees. I dont get why theirs 2 on's for the high and low speed
Click to expand...

I did that so long ago
I guess I really don't remember my reasoning for picking those values
other than
I wanted to lower the temps somewhat

I guess you could ask Wes the same about how he arrived at his values

I really don't know why there are two values for the high speed on

Grady
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Jun 20, 2007
#10
  • Jun 20, 2007
  • #10
I don't know what the purpose of the two settings are either.

As for my fan values, I was shooting for the car to run in the 190s - those settings got me there. Feel free to change them up, just add or subtract the same amount from each of the values to keep them spaced apart correctly.

Everyone's setup is a bit different. I have read several places that the 302s run most efficiently around 200 degrees. Engine wear supposedly increases a good deal when you run colder. I wish I could remember now at least one source to back this up - if I do, I'll be sure to post it - maybe someone else can confirm or deny.

Wes
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Jun 20, 2007
#11
  • Jun 20, 2007
  • #11
thanks for clearing up whether or not those wiki settings work, Wes.

Stanger007 said:
But 200 is about the hottest I've seen it get -- or to be more precise "RM" on the gauge.
Click to expand...

hehehehe

seriously, though--if "RM" on the stock guage is around 200, what's the "N"?
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Jun 21, 2007
#12
  • Jun 21, 2007
  • #12
Punisher302 said:
seriously, though--if "RM" on the stock guage is around 200, what's the "N"?
Click to expand...

Ok, watching my ECT this morning vs the gauge.

180 is dead on the N
190 is halfway on the "R" of "OR".

I would love to see someone else's results to see if their gauge reads similar temps at those gauge positions.

Wes
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Jun 21, 2007
#13
  • Jun 21, 2007
  • #13
^^^cool! by your calculations, that means my stang is running at the desired 180*ish!

now if i could only keep it from overheating whenever i get on it.. hopefully the new mishimoto radiator will cure that.
 

m0l0

Member
Nov 20, 2005
178
0
17
Jun 21, 2007
#14
  • Jun 21, 2007
  • #14
Stanger007 said:
I have read several places that the 302s run most efficiently around 200 degrees. Engine wear supposedly increases a good deal when you run colder. I wish I could remember now at least one source to back this up - if I do, I'll be sure to post it - maybe someone else can confirm or deny.

Wes
Click to expand...

Yes i Also remember that, if i recall correctly it was more for those who use 160F Thermostats

If I recall correctly the green zone of wear & effic. was between 190 - 210 more or less than that would cause a wear + 30-40%
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jun 21, 2007
#15
  • Jun 21, 2007
  • #15
m0l0 said:
Yes i Also remember that, if i recall correctly it was more for those who use 160F Thermostats

If I recall correctly the green zone of wear & effic. was between 190 - 210 more or less than that would cause a wear + 30-40%
Click to expand...

Bingo!


Here's a decent graph...
(but I their "Ideal" temps up about 10F higher that what is shown here... just my preference...)
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Jun 21, 2007
#16
  • Jun 21, 2007
  • #16
Can anyone else look at their ECT vs stock temperate gauge and see what they are reading at 180 and 190 deg.

We always talk about how inaccurate the stock gauges are but I wonder if the differences everyone sees are mainly due to differences in cooling setups/fluid ratios.

Or the gauges could truly be inaccurate.

Wes
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Jun 21, 2007
#17
  • Jun 21, 2007
  • #17
Awesome graph vristang - thanks!
 

m0l0

Member
Nov 20, 2005
178
0
17
Jun 21, 2007
#18
  • Jun 21, 2007
  • #18
Excelent find , i remember that graph a loong time ago nice finding!


Stanger007 said:
Can anyone else look at their ECT vs stock temperate gauge and see what they are reading at 180 and 190 deg.

We always talk about how inaccurate the stock gauges are but I wonder if the differences everyone sees are mainly due to differences in cooling setups/fluid ratios.

Or the gauges could truly be inaccurate.

Wes
Click to expand...


By doing some research i came up with something like this according to Calcon Display

. . ...|.....N.....O.......R......M....... A.....L...|....
160..|.180.|.190..|.200.|..210.|.220.|.???..|

I think even less was the temp. i will doit again, but as far a i remember the "A - L" was not "that" hot at all , but i have never seen higher temps

One thing also , the Gauge Sensor is completely independent of the EEC ECT sensor, and they are located on diferent places on the intake so the Gauge temp was pretty much high but the eec ect was not "that" hot.

With that in mind i dont know who is more trusty but my shot would be the EEC ECT , maybe a intake - pump - rad - diagram would lead us to know the one is more acurate to the real engine watter temp.

Edit : If i remember correctly the EEC ect is the one located near the thermostat (on the heater pipe intersection ) and reads the watter exit temp of both banks (goes directly to the RAD ), where the gauge temp sensor is the one that only reads 5-8 bank watter temp.
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Jun 21, 2007
#19
  • Jun 21, 2007
  • #19
^^^hmm, that seems a little too good to be true. hope it is, though!
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Jun 21, 2007
#20
  • Jun 21, 2007
  • #20
m0l0 said:
. . ...|.....N.....O.......R......M....... A.....L...|....
160..|.180.|.190..|.200.|..210.|.220.|.???..|
Click to expand...

Excellent work - that seems to be somewhat in line with what my readings were. Maybe the stock gauge isn't quite as inaccurate as thought.

Anyone else care to test it?

Wes
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Z
Cool fan issues
  • Zipcity
  • Dec 23, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
12
Views
591
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Dec 27, 2025
manicmechanic007
Engine Contour fan CFM
  • Mustang5L5
  • Apr 6, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
379
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 22, 2026
qikgts
Cooling fan identity
  • SteveG94GT
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
135
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 12, 2026
SteveG94GT
Engine Themostat
  • Mindseye007
  • Jan 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
661
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
86HO5.0
8
M
cooling fan not turning on, but does when ac is on or when coolant temp is jumped or unplugged.
  • Mycarhatesme
  • Mar 14, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
166
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 12, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?