• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Tweecer or AEM ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mred03gt
  • Start date Start date Nov 7, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 7, 2005
#21
  • Nov 7, 2005
  • #21
blksn955.o said:
wich one are you talking about?? AEM or Tweecer (for the ones who dont know reading this). If your talking about the tweecer...the other option is as simple as entering it into the scaler.

Also the PMS does not have controle of the MAFtransfer from what I recall...and after seeing time and time again the importance of this ability...to me this is a HUGE issue with the PMS...read HUGE.
Click to expand...

Just a thought here

Since we do have a good number of members on our very own site who use PMS and Tweecer for self tuning

I think it would be very cool and helpful as well to start a new thread and discuss the differences and methods of using each system to tune.

Grady
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Nov 8, 2005
#22
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #22
That is a good idea, cut to the chase and get the facts from users about the fine details of each.
 

Methodical

15 Year Member
Dec 1, 2003
1,192
11
59
Clinton, MD
Nov 8, 2005
#23
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #23
blksn955.o said:
wich one are you talking about?? AEM or Tweecer (for the ones who dont know reading this). If your talking about the tweecer...the other option is as simple as entering it into the scaler.

Also the PMS does not have controle of the MAFtransfer from what I recall...and after seeing time and time again the importance of this ability...to me this is a HUGE issue with the PMS...read HUGE.
Click to expand...


Thanks Blksn955.0. Now I know why the gentleman that I talked to about the PMS said that I would not be able to work out any idle or drivability issues with the PMS - because it does not have control over the MAF curve.

Another note: I think the PMS only takes over from 2000 rpms and up, which is another point that tells me that it rules out working out idle issues.

For some strange reasons, I can't edit my original posts.
 

Methodical

15 Year Member
Dec 1, 2003
1,192
11
59
Clinton, MD
Nov 8, 2005
#24
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #24
mred03gt said:
I just finished my engine project on my 94 GT Auto and needless to say my stock computer is not happy. I have a SCT racer package, but it has not worked as well on this car as it did on my 03 GT. I want to make real-time changes without have to pull the chip and reburn it.

Thanks

Scott
Click to expand...

Didn't I tell you. You will get lots of info. on this topic. Peace
 

mred03gt

New Member
Dec 10, 2003
33
0
0
Nov 8, 2005
#25
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #25
Methodical said:
Didn't I tell you. You will get lots of info. on this topic. Peace
Click to expand...


That's why I posted here. You guys are great. It would be nice to see what you guys are going through with each system like Grady suggested.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 8, 2005
#26
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #26
mred03gt said:
That's why I posted here. You guys are great. It would be nice to see what you guys are going through with each system like Grady suggested.
Click to expand...

Well Scott

I might post up a thing or two if you wanna start a new thread.

I would suggest the following guidelines:

Use words in the thread title that would make it helpful for future searches.

Encourage peeps to not get all emotional or think along the lines of...... mine is better than yours (pissing match) which will keep the thread tech and not sink down to a bunch of childish rhetoric and finally the mod locks the thread.

I'm proud to say that kind of thing does not happen much on our forum but still ........ peeps will be peeps, lol.

Grady
 

Methodical

15 Year Member
Dec 1, 2003
1,192
11
59
Clinton, MD
Nov 9, 2005
#27
  • Nov 9, 2005
  • #27
mred03gt said:
That's why I posted here. You guys are great. It would be nice to see what you guys are going through with each system like Grady suggested.
Click to expand...

I started a new thread on November 7th asking tuners to chime in and provide detailed info on their self tuning efforts. The thread is still on the first page. There are some replys and hopefully lots more will chime in. Keep watching it though. Check it out. Peace
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
Looking for ECU/CHIP for 1992 5.0
  • Nathan26
  • Sep 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
306
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 8, 2026
Qtrhrse23
B
Electrical Why does my fox body keep frying eecs
  • brandyn200
  • Jun 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
486
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 25, 2026
AeroCoupe
F
Ford 460 swap
  • Ford460
  • Sep 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
457
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 14, 2026
Ford460
F
I
Engine Help requested in identifying how to resolve engine light issue
  • Ianslaney
  • Oct 4, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
170
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 4, 2026
Bullitt347
89 LX Electrical Troubles
  • fun331
  • Oct 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
443
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 27, 2025
fun331
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?