• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

typhoon intake

  • Thread starter Thread starter custom89stang
  • Start date Start date Oct 2, 2004
C

custom89stang

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
705
0
0
Seattle, WA
Oct 2, 2004
#1
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #1
how much will this add...HP/Trq wise? I will have about 20HP over stock (from full exhaust) and am getting rebuilt E7TE heads....so my motor will run better, just curious about the typhoon, i have Fenderwell CAI also...thanks...how much HP over stock am i making now TOTAL? thanks guys
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Oct 2, 2004
#2
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #2
It'd be similar to the gains of a edelbrock intake.
 
C

custom89stang

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
705
0
0
Seattle, WA
Oct 2, 2004
#3
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #3
well i dont know what gains the edelbrock gives ya, i know its basically a replica for cheaper....come on, i know someone has baseline dyno'd a stock 5.0 motor added an edelbrock/typhoon and dyno'd it again....10?20?30?40hp? PLUS i heard the lower intake is what is most restricting on a stock 5.0
 

bmo37

Founding Member
Jun 27, 2001
2,368
2
46
New Jersey
Oct 2, 2004
#4
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #4
I can tell you when i had my basically stock motor, with 75mm maf, 70mm t-body, and cai, full exhaust, the typhoon killed my low end power, but gained on the upper rpm pulls, plus the engine reved faster.
 
C

custom89stang

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
705
0
0
Seattle, WA
Oct 2, 2004
#5
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #5
ok thanks, that was good info, thanks bmo!
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Oct 2, 2004
#6
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #6
Little too big for stock heads but a nice peice as mentioned in the upper RPM.
 

FiveLtrRiceEatr

New Member
Oct 2, 2004
197
0
0
Michigan
Oct 2, 2004
#7
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #7
the intake is cheaper because it is not treated with the same care of edelbrock does, it is edelbrock, but they dont take all the "flash" out of it after it is made in the mold.
 

SR86

Founding Member
Dec 4, 2001
146
0
0
Alberta, canada
Oct 2, 2004
#8
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #8
I had to clean mine up a little before putting it on, inside the runners was a lil ill....took away power from the bottom end, but seems to work well with my E-303, and 1-5/8's...
 

bmorrisj

Member
Sep 26, 2003
449
0
17
Buena Park, CA
Oct 2, 2004
#9
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #9
FiveLtrRiceEatr said:
the intake is cheaper because it is not treated with the same care of edelbrock does, it is edelbrock, but they dont take all the "flash" out of it after it is made in the mold.
Click to expand...


nope its a made in china piece, needs a bit of machine work to clean it up too...
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Oct 2, 2004
#10
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #10
It's cheap and gives you room to grow, the polished version has a good look to it..I have it and it's the first thing complimented when the hood goes up. With these old cars you have to think ahead and spend wisely cause you can't sell it for what you have in it, the typhoon saves on the pocket book. I like it and at 300HP it flows lots and lots without being ported. You will like it and save some cash, but any aftermarket intake will do you well with the ported E7's.
 

bmo37

Founding Member
Jun 27, 2001
2,368
2
46
New Jersey
Oct 3, 2004
#11
  • Oct 3, 2004
  • #11
DMAN302 said:
It's cheap and gives you room to grow, the polished version has a good look to it..I have it and it's the first thing complimented when the hood goes up. With these old cars you have to think ahead and spend wisely cause you can't sell it for what you have in it, the typhoon saves on the pocket book. I like it and at 300HP it flows lots and lots without being ported. You will like it and save some cash, but any aftermarket intake will do you well with the ported E7's.
Click to expand...

I agree, I bought it when it first came out for that very reason that it was cost effective, I couldn't afford to spend 500 or 600 hundred bux on an intake, when I could buy one for $275 that with a little clean up flows just the as good or better than the edelbrock rpm
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
849
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
G
S550 Headers
  • gray owl
  • Feb 1, 2026
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
197
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Feb 1, 2026
gray owl
G
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
590
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
459
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
D
Fuel Erratic Fuel Pressure 1985 GT
  • DienstXIV
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
616
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 16, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?