• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

typoohn intake good/bad?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DDSTANG94
  • Start date Start date Dec 19, 2006

DDSTANG94

New Member
Dec 9, 2006
465
2
0
FRASER, MICHIGAN
Dec 19, 2006
#1
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #1
Is anyone using the typhoon intake manifold from P.P. is it good quality or does it sux. My friend wants to install one on his 90. GT but wants to know if he should just spring the extra money for the edelbrock.
 

94gsl5.0

New Member
Sep 7, 2004
223
0
0
seatown
Dec 19, 2006
#2
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #2
Same design as the edel performer RPM. If your friend has time to clean up some of the casting he can save some money by going with the P.P. intake and it will flow just as good as the edel perf. It will move the power band up... so it may or may not match what he has on the car already.
 

Ronman

Founding Member
Feb 10, 2001
50
0
0
Huntington, WV
Dec 20, 2006
#3
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #3
i have it on my car, yeah you really need to clean it up. it is a good deal if you got the time and tools to smooth everything out and gasket match it. with my combo the power seems to come on about 2,800-3,000 and pulls atleast to 6,500 thats where i stop the madness
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Dec 20, 2006
#4
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #4
I'm also running one on my car and I'm very happy with it. I wonder if I really would have benefitted much from cleaning up the casting, since mine looked pretty good out of the box. Some of these are hit or miss, but I'm also running the PP elbow and 70mm throttle body with no issues whatsoever.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Dec 20, 2006
#5
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #5
the polished stuff looks nice, and the price is great, but the fitment of pro products (pp) parts with other non-pp parts is not very good.

to be specific, i have heard that the throttle body bolt holes don't line up with, for example, a tfs elbow. i hear you have to make the holes bigger to get the studs through.

and their elbow doesn't line up well with a bbk throttle body. i had a 70mm pp elbow and a 70mm bbk t/b. even though the bolt holes lined up, when i put it together and opened the throttle blade and looked at the inside edge where the throttle body and elbow bores meet, it was not even close. it was so bad that i was worried that the throttle blade would hit the edge of the elbow bore, but it didn't. so i ran with it like that , but it was annoying.

but it sounds like if you go with all pp stuff (upper, lower, elbow, and t/b), the fitment is ok ...
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Dec 20, 2006
#6
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #6
94gsl5.0 said:
Same design as the edel performer. If your friend has time to clean up some of the casting he can save some money by going with the P.P. intake and it will flow just as good as the edel perf. It will move the power band up... so it may or may not match what he has on the car already.
Click to expand...

This is mis-information. The Typhoon intake is the same design as the Performer RPM intake. I believe the RPM range for that manifold was 1500-6500, making it great for the common 302 HCI.

The Performer's range is idle - 5500, which is great for a bolt on stock replacement.

The Typhoon is the reason that Edelbrock no longer makes the RPM, just the Performer and Performer RPM II.

In terms of quality, I've never had first hand experience. Reading off the boards though, it seems like a 50/50 split.

Adam
 

94gsl5.0

New Member
Sep 7, 2004
223
0
0
seatown
Dec 20, 2006
#7
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #7
sorry left out the RPM part...

But i don't think all of what i posted was mis-information... if cleaned up it will flow as good as the real thing. and as u said above the power band is raised somewhat.
 

Dan95-5.0

Active Member
Jun 14, 2003
1,110
0
36
Manitoba, Canada
Dec 20, 2006
#8
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #8
got this intake too. bought a used non polished version and polished it myself.

i also ported it too. the casting was pretty ****y. took no time to clean it up tho. i used a PP fox 70mm throttle body without a problem. when i put it all together, i didnt realize how bad the throttle body matched the intake so i have to port that when the car comes out of storage.

i wouldn't think twice about this intake if the price was right.
 

OrangeMustangGt

Founding Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,976
0
36
Cape Cod, MA
Dec 20, 2006
#9
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #9
me and my brother have one....very nice
 

69clark

Founding Member
Sep 25, 2002
731
7
18
Ravena, NY
Dec 20, 2006
#10
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #10
I haven't owned one but I have read all over the net about the same thing everyone else is saying. Clean up the ports and you set to go.
 

slvrbullit302

New Member
Jan 6, 2004
986
1
0
Alabama
Dec 20, 2006
#11
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #11
I have had one since they first came out, out the box uncleaned or gasket matched it made 260rwhp and 290rwtq with the following other mods: "f" cam, ported E7's, 75mm tb, 75mm MAF, 30# inj., long tubes and pro-chamber, 1.6RR.

Now with the 331 I have it still seems to be doing ok but I am about to change out a bunch of stuff and I will be removing the intake for something a little more race orientated.
 
M

MustangGT95

New Member
Jul 29, 2003
407
1
0
Jan 1, 2007
#12
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #12
What are you guys using to clean it up? Dremel do the job?
 

mustangt562

Member
Jan 22, 2004
226
0
16
Long Beach
Jan 2, 2007
#13
  • Jan 2, 2007
  • #13
Its a great budget intake if you clean it up and gasket match it. I got a lower that was already ported and whoever ported mine gasket matched it and ported it all the way through opening to opening and it is smooth like a baby bottom. I could not be happer. I have the performer upper and am in the process of getting a rpm upper so i can swap at will. but it will FORSURE need to be cleaned up/ported cause the castings are horrible!!
 

Farmers SN95

Member
Jun 2, 2006
76
0
6
Ky
Jan 3, 2007
#14
  • Jan 3, 2007
  • #14
I got a real 93 cobra intake, the lower it ported, that I will sell.
 
M

MustangGT95

New Member
Jul 29, 2003
407
1
0
Jan 7, 2007
#15
  • Jan 7, 2007
  • #15
Do I have to use a PP elbow and TB with this also? Heard they didn't fit aftermarket elbows and TB's very well. Is this true? Will the other parts fit with some dremeling?
 

gtcoupeaust

New Member
Oct 12, 2004
9
0
0
Feb 9, 2007
#16
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #16
i have tyhoon, with PP elbow and BBK 70mm TB all fitted good. Had to mod my water outlet by grinding the top down as it hit the manifold. apart from that all good.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Most ridiculous / dishonest work you have heard a shop recommend?
  • SchwarzStock
  • Jul 19, 2026
  • Off-Topic Hangout
Replies
4
Views
135
Off-Topic Hangout Jul 20, 2026
SchwarzStock
I
Engine Help requested in identifying how to resolve engine light issue
  • Ianslaney
  • Oct 4, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
169
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 4, 2026
Bullitt347
T
What's it Worth? 2002 GT conv/auto
  • tonydetesta
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
836
What is it Worth?!?!? Jan 21, 2026
Mustang5L5
R
1974 Datsun 620 pickup / 5.0L HO
  • RJH46
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
1
Views
412
Other Auto Tech Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?