• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

UnderDrive Pulleys

  • Thread starter Thread starter BANGERSTANGER76
  • Start date Start date Dec 7, 2011

BANGERSTANGER76

Member
Nov 4, 2011
286
9
19
DETROIT PLUGZONE 76
Dec 7, 2011
#1
  • Dec 7, 2011
  • #1
Guys,

I have a set of underdrive pulleys on my car. They seem to be performing ok. But I wanted to ask what do you all think about them? Do you use them? Do you recommend them? I have since heard about a few isssues and I dont want to cause any problems under there. Let me know your thoughts

Thanks
Banger
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,886
21,067
234
Box behind Walmart
Dec 7, 2011
#2
  • Dec 7, 2011
  • #2
Buy pulleys for engine bay dress up... not HP.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Dec 7, 2011
#3
  • Dec 7, 2011
  • #3
I had pulley's on my 347, didn't like that the alternator pulley was small and sometimes at idle during dark the headlights would dim. Probably should have just switched back to the stock pulley's. There's not a huge HP difference between the two, it's not something you can feel.
 

BANGERSTANGER76

Member
Nov 4, 2011
286
9
19
DETROIT PLUGZONE 76
Dec 7, 2011
#4
  • Dec 7, 2011
  • #4
VibrantRedGT said:
I had pulley's on my 347, didn't like that the alternator pulley was small and sometimes at idle during dark the headlights would dim. Probably should have just switched back to the stock pulley's. There's not a huge HP difference between the two, it's not something you can feel.
Click to expand...

This is exactly what I started this thread to hear.
I dont want a basically useless modification to disturb and thing else under the hood especially electrical. I definately dont real feel the extra power and I dont want to ruin my alternator or anyhting ellse under there. Kind of leaning towards taking them off or maybe just leave the water pump underpulley on. We'll see based off of the replies I get.
Thanks for ressponding bro. Appreciated.
 

N8Dogg98

15 Year Member
Apr 4, 2005
3,872
238
184
MN
Dec 7, 2011
#5
  • Dec 7, 2011
  • #5
They will provide a minor boost in accelleration due to the decreased effort in spinning the accessories. I've had them on my car for years and don't have an issue. I also don't experience any dimming of the headlights at night probably because I have a good battery and a healthy alternator.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,061
2,665
224
Vass, NC
Dec 7, 2011
#6
  • Dec 7, 2011
  • #6
They're worth every penny on a car with a 3G alternator like yours. From the dynos I remember seeing back in the 5.0 days, they picked up anywhere from 6-10 rwhp. Running your alternator slower is not going to damage it. Hell, it might even reduce wear to an extent. If your parts are healthy, they won't cause an overheating issue, or an electrical problem.

You might be concerned about things you hear on the fox-body 5.0s, which did not have the 3G alternators. Those cars could barely pump the power needed to run everything stock. That's why the police interceptors came with the upgraded alternators, and why you'll hear people having problems running down their battery at idle when they put pullies on the car. The difference is, those alternators only made 85 amps stock. Yours pushes 130. So, even at a 20% underdrive, you should still be making well more than the old cars did.
 
Reactions: woollums

BANGERSTANGER76

Member
Nov 4, 2011
286
9
19
DETROIT PLUGZONE 76
Dec 7, 2011
#7
  • Dec 7, 2011
  • #7
FastDriver said:
They're worth every penny on a car with a 3G alternator like yours. From the dynos I remember seeing back in the 5.0 days, they picked up anywhere from 6-10 rwhp. Running your alternator slower is not going to damage it. Hell, it might even reduce wear to an extent. If your parts are healthy, they won't cause an overheating issue, or an electrical problem.

You might be concerned about things you hear on the fox-body 5.0s, which did not have the 3G alternators. Those cars could barely pump the power needed to run everything stock. That's why the police interceptors came with the upgraded alternators, and why you'll hear people having problems running down their battery at idle when they put pullies on the car. The difference is, those alternators only made 85 amps stock. Yours pushes 130. So, even at a 20% underdrive, you should still be making well more than the old cars did.
Click to expand...

Thanks bro.
This really makes it much clearer for me.
When I installed them I was told it was for extra horses and I did it becasue it seemsed like a minor and easy mod. Which is what I wanted. Then I started hearing about nagging issues. But it only makes sense. I have new alternator and waterpump so I should be fine. Ill leave it alone. Its running great and I havent had any issues. Thanks again.
 

toyman

10 Year Member
Jul 19, 2007
1,944
54
79
Vernon BC
Dec 8, 2011
#8
  • Dec 8, 2011
  • #8
VibrantRedGT said:
I had pulley's on my 347, didn't like that the alternator pulley was small and sometimes at idle during dark the headlights would dim. Probably should have just switched back to the stock pulley's. There's not a huge HP difference between the two, it's not something you can feel.
Click to expand...

Actually a smaller pulley spins the alternator faster to compensate for the smaller crank UD pulley. IIRC an alternator can be built to deliver full output at idle speeds.
 

BANGERSTANGER76

Member
Nov 4, 2011
286
9
19
DETROIT PLUGZONE 76
Dec 8, 2011
#9
  • Dec 8, 2011
  • #9
I'm learning alot. Thank you boys for sharing the knowledge.

BANGER
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,288
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 11, 2011
#10
  • Dec 11, 2011
  • #10
I run an underdrive crank and alternator pulley. Never had any significant problem with the alternator. It drops in voltage a little at idle, but not below battery voltage. I usually drops from 14.4v to just over 13v. I did keep the stock water pump pulley, because the water pump did spin a little too slow. My car idles around 900rpm.

Kurt
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Themostat
  • Mindseye007
  • Jan 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
642
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
86HO5.0
8
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
644
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
P
rear Impact absorbers.
  • Praetorious
  • May 4, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
129
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2026
Praetorious
P
Suspension End link replacement size
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • May 12, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
103
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 20, 2026
Teen'93stang5.0
C
Bored with my 73
  • Curtis Harper
  • Apr 14, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
156
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 23, 2026
RaggedGT
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?