• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Update: Head Swap Complete

  • Thread starter Thread starter JamesBaumann
  • Start date Start date Apr 26, 2005

JamesBaumann

Member
Nov 26, 2003
624
0
16
Vancouver Island
Apr 26, 2005
#1
  • Apr 26, 2005
  • #1
So guys, I finally got my car running again tonight with the new cylinder head. Mods include:

- Ranger Cam & Followers
- Port & Polish
- Shaved 0.50"

I must say, I am very relieved and disappointed at the same time. I am relieved in that the car runs again and now I can sleep again. However, I am a little disappointed in that there was very little power increase. Could this be due to the fact that my exhaust is still stock and restrictive? Or I dont have a proper cold air kit? I would have expected to see atleast a little power increase, but that was not the case. I have a feeling that my ignition timing is way off, which could be something else to check.

Anyhow, I was just wondering what experiences anyone else has had that did these same mods. Did they seem to increase your power dramatically? Thanks for any input.
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Apr 27, 2005
#2
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #2
definatly check the ignition timing. If you can still get away with it, you might try 12-14*, but of course detonation will be the deciding factor.
The compression should give you a crisper throttle responce down low, with some extended rpms up top. The porting should give you a fatter and longer power band. But of course, we are talking about the difference between 90hp and maybe 110-120hp so it isn't going to be earth shattering.
 

stackz

Founding Member
Jun 13, 2001
1,352
7
58
james island, sc
Apr 27, 2005
#3
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #3
assuming an n/a engine??
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Apr 27, 2005
#4
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #4
Your engine only flows as well as it's weakest link...I'd guess there is something else in your setup that flows less than the head.
 

Shawneebear93

20+ Year Stangneter
May 4, 2004
518
17
49
Salisbury Twp, Allentown, PA
Apr 27, 2005
#5
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #5
How much does it cost for the port/polish and shaving or did you do it yourself?
 

JamesBaumann

Member
Nov 26, 2003
624
0
16
Vancouver Island
Apr 27, 2005
#6
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #6
tealtiger93 said:
How much does it cost for the port/polish and shaving or did you do it yourself?
Click to expand...

I ported and polished myself. The shaving didnt cost me much. Maybe $50, and we are talking Canadian Dollars.
 

JamesBaumann

Member
Nov 26, 2003
624
0
16
Vancouver Island
Apr 27, 2005
#7
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #7
Stinger said:
Your engine only flows as well as it's weakest link...I'd guess there is something else in your setup that flows less than the head.
Click to expand...

I hear your point. I am still using stock, unmodified intakes. That could definitely be it. I have other intakes that are glass beaded and thoroughly polished. I was planning to swap those on when I did the head, but once I got everything apart I felt I had enough on my plate for the time being. I will swap my intakes on a little later. Should I be port matching these intakes? I wasn't going to because somebody on here told me that I would be losing a lot of low end torque. What's your opinion?

I am also using a stock, unmodified exhaust manifold with no exhaust mods with the exception of one deleted catalytic. That'll also hurt my flow. I've got a ranger header that is waiting to be swapped on. Again, same story, I was going to do it when I did my head, but then I decided to leave it for another day.

Anyhow, keeping these things in mind, I still expected to see a little more of a power gain from this mod. I guess I'll set the base ignition timing and see if that helps any.
 

JamesBaumann

Member
Nov 26, 2003
624
0
16
Vancouver Island
Apr 27, 2005
#8
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #8
stackz said:
assuming an n/a engine??
Click to expand...

Yes.
 

Shawneebear93

20+ Year Stangneter
May 4, 2004
518
17
49
Salisbury Twp, Allentown, PA
Apr 28, 2005
#9
  • Apr 28, 2005
  • #9
How do you port/polish it? Is it worth the port/polish (since it would be free if I did it) without the shaving?
 

Dan P.

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
483
0
27
N.C.
Apr 28, 2005
#10
  • Apr 28, 2005
  • #10
I would say go ahead and put the Ranger header on, you will see that the motor will rev faster and that it will have more power in the upper RPMs. Plus there is a 20lb difference between the stock header and the Ranger, ever little bit helps.

Dan
 

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
Apr 28, 2005
#11
  • Apr 28, 2005
  • #11
shave some wieght on that ledsled, youll feel the difference, or nitrous
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Apr 28, 2005
#12
  • Apr 28, 2005
  • #12
The exhaust is definatly the restriction here. A long tube with a full 2.5" exhaust would be ideal.
 

Shawneebear93

20+ Year Stangneter
May 4, 2004
518
17
49
Salisbury Twp, Allentown, PA
Apr 28, 2005
#13
  • Apr 28, 2005
  • #13
bhuff30 said:
The exhaust is definatly the restriction here. A long tube with a full 2.5" exhaust would be ideal.
Click to expand...
I second that notion.
 

JamesBaumann

Member
Nov 26, 2003
624
0
16
Vancouver Island
Apr 28, 2005
#14
  • Apr 28, 2005
  • #14
bhuff30 said:
The exhaust is definatly the restriction here. A long tube with a full 2.5" exhaust would be ideal.
Click to expand...

Like I said, I've already got that Ranger header ready to go on. I was thinking 2.25" exhaust all the way back, but you think 2.5" will be better? I was kinda worried about backpressure.

So what was the verdict on the intakes? Am I porting them or not?
 

Shawneebear93

20+ Year Stangneter
May 4, 2004
518
17
49
Salisbury Twp, Allentown, PA
Apr 29, 2005
#15
  • Apr 29, 2005
  • #15
I have 2.5" and I'm happy with it. I can't say for 2.25 thought.
 

MustangLXT

New Member
Nov 1, 2004
81
0
0
Florida
Apr 30, 2005
#16
  • Apr 30, 2005
  • #16
I'm interested in Port and Polish on my Head as well, can anyone give me instructions on this?
 

Shawneebear93

20+ Year Stangneter
May 4, 2004
518
17
49
Salisbury Twp, Allentown, PA
May 1, 2005
#17
  • May 1, 2005
  • #17
MustangLXT said:
I'm interested in Port and Polish on my Head as well, can anyone give me instructions on this?
Click to expand...
I'd like some info concerning this as well.
 

JamesBaumann

Member
Nov 26, 2003
624
0
16
Vancouver Island
May 1, 2005
#18
  • May 1, 2005
  • #18
Look in the tech articles. There is a link there to a how-to site.
 

Shawneebear93

20+ Year Stangneter
May 4, 2004
518
17
49
Salisbury Twp, Allentown, PA
May 1, 2005
#19
  • May 1, 2005
  • #19
Thanks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Fuel Pump Issues After Replacement/Upgrade
  • Ryu
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
571
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2026
Ryu
M
2004 v8 convertible
  • Mikeycrownvicluver
  • Feb 12, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
371
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 15, 2026
Mikeycrownvicluver
M
J
can you use the heads off a H O 302 to put on a regular 302 engine
  • Jan H
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
6
Views
366
Other Auto Tech May 17, 2026
nickyb
E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
137
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
ejscarfo
E
Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
672
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?