• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

upgrades?

  • Thread starter Thread starter halfwaytie
  • Start date Start date Jun 21, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
H

halfwaytie

New Member
Jan 7, 2009
36
0
0
Canada SK
Jun 21, 2009
#1
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #1
hey i was wanting to know what are some things i could do to give my motor more of a bark? i have done spark pugs and wires, intake and distributor cap and rotor.
so what are some other things i could do to it?
 
7

72COMETGT

New Member
Feb 1, 2009
8
0
0
Jun 21, 2009
#2
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #2
You can set the TPS sensor to .98volts (closed position). It is usually around .80 volts. The object is to get it as close to 1volt as possible but DO NOT go over. If you go over it puts the ECM in tip in/ part throttle mode. This makes sure the ECM sees 5 volts @WOT. You may have to elongate the holes in it to get it to adjust. You can bump the timing 2-4 degrees , just look out for pinging/detonation issues. If you have an adjustable fuel pressure regulator you can raise the pressure from around 36psi to 42psi. Just make sure it doesn't run fat.
 

SMOKEDYA

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 13, 2003
3,637
8
79
Tucson AZ
Jun 21, 2009
#3
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #3
72COMETGT said:
You can set the TPS sensor to .98volts (closed position). It is usually around .80 volts. The object is to get it as close to 1volt as possible but DO NOT go over. If you go over it puts the ECM in tip in/ part throttle mode. This makes sure the ECM sees 5 volts @WOT. You may have to elongate the holes in it to get it to adjust. You can bump the timing 2-4 degrees , just look out for pinging/detonation issues. If you have an adjustable fuel pressure regulator you can raise the pressure from around 36psi to 42psi. Just make sure it doesn't run fat.
Click to expand...

can this be done on a 92 with the 8 plug head? if so how do i adjust the timming with no dizzy? Also what can be expected in power gains from doing this?peace











john
 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,896
73
129
Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Jun 22, 2009
#4
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #4
You can't do much with a 2.3L, I will just tell you that right now. The things you can do, won't get you much power.

The 2.3 is no mini-me of the 5.0. It just doesn't make any power without forced induction.

I'd recommend spending money on the suspension.
 
H

halfwaytie

New Member
Jan 7, 2009
36
0
0
Canada SK
Jun 22, 2009
#5
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #5
ya i know the 2.3 dos not make to much power. but it seems way to slow like i mean WAY to slow lol.
there are no turbo kits for the 2.3 right? what could i do to get forced induction?
 

SMOKEDYA

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 13, 2003
3,637
8
79
Tucson AZ
Jun 23, 2009
#6
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #6
could i just throw a turbo on a stock 92 motor? no crazy boost or nothing but something with a little more UMPH i was thinking about the turbo but i dont want to go wild on it as for i have my 93 SSP car that i built. Is there any other 4 banger stang sites out there? peace








john
 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,896
73
129
Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Jun 23, 2009
#7
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #7
Stocker has cast pistons...so throwing a turbo on is not the best idea. You can run about 6-7 psi max and even that isn't a sure bet.

Even with that you still have to swap the injectors, ecu, manifold, turbo and some other bits.

Best bet is either a turbo swap, or do some minor bolt-ons and leave it alone otherwise.
 

bonestock87

Founding Member
Dec 19, 2001
732
12
38
Cape Coral, FL
Jun 23, 2009
#8
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #8
Would running a turbo with low boost through the mass-air not work? Intercooled or not, you decide. Let's say you get some bigger injectors (say, 35lbers) and a matching mass-air meter. Forget the pistons and valves for a moment and tell me why this wouldn't work?
 
J

j and v

Member
Jan 24, 2007
34
0
7
nebraska
Jun 23, 2009
#9
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #9
The ECU simply isn't setup to handle the added complication of forced induction. The N/A computer won't be able to provide the longer duration injector pulses required for the added air volume. You can get a rising rate fuel pressure regulator, but I highly doubt that'll take care of all the fuel needs. Not to mention there will be no knock sensor, so if you run into detonation, the computer will have no clue when to pull the timing back, or by how much. Plan on changing head gaskets frequently. And eventually you'll want more power, and you'll turn up the boost, and you'll melt the stock cast pistons. If you wan't a turboed 4, just get the proper engine and supporting equipment.
 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,896
73
129
Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Jun 24, 2009
#10
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #10
The 2.3 n/a has a knock sensor, just not in the same location as the turbo motors.

Also, the n/a engines had high impedence injectors while the turbo engines had low impedence ones. Far as I know, the n/a computer won't even work with turbo injectors.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jun 24, 2009
#11
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #11
bonestock87 said:
Would running a turbo with low boost through the mass-air not work? Intercooled or not, you decide. Let's say you get some bigger injectors (say, 35lbers) and a matching mass-air meter. Forget the pistons and valves for a moment and tell me why this wouldn't work?
Click to expand...
I don't think you will find a 'calibrated' MAF meter for the 2.3 ecu's.

Most guys out there running 2.3 MAF with boost, seem to run an LA3 with MAF conversion. This REQUIRES the use of a tuner like Moates QuarterHorse or a TwEECer, which makes the aftermarket MAF meters useless.

I recently finished getting a LA3/MAF setup in my '87 LX... no boost.
Still need to fine tune, but almost everything is functional now.
It isn't too tough, and there is a fair amount of documentation out there.




Above someone suggested setting the TPS to .98v
This is straight BS, and will do NOTHING for performance.



If the 2.3 is down on power, then I suggest checking the cam timing. I had a belt slip a few years ago and that dropped power almost as bad as putting a hole in one of the pistons
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jun 24, 2009
#12
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #12
72COMETGT said:
You can set the TPS sensor to .98volts (closed position). It is usually around .80 volts. The object is to get it as close to 1volt as possible but DO NOT go over. If you go over it puts the ECM in tip in/ part throttle mode. This makes sure the ECM sees 5 volts @WOT. You may have to elongate the holes in it to get it to adjust. You can bump the timing 2-4 degrees , just look out for pinging/detonation issues. If you have an adjustable fuel pressure regulator you can raise the pressure from around 36psi to 42psi. Just make sure it doesn't run fat.
Click to expand...
As I said... setting the tps is BS.

Fuel pressure should be 39-41psi anyway.
 

93stangnow2.3t

New Member
Jun 24, 2009
10
0
1
Jun 24, 2009
#13
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #13
Just buy a 83-88 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe.

87 TC's have a LA2 compared to the 88 which have an LA3 which is a more agressive computer your next bet is to buy a 83-86 TC in which case you have to buy an LA2or 3 and a large VAM so you can use the same wiring conversions for the car if you buy a late 85 or an 86 you wont have to change the injectors they are #35's and the LA2/3's need those injectors to function properly if you buy an 83, 84, or an early 85 you will have to change the injectors they are #30's the quick way to tell is if you look at them an they are brown on top the most common name for the #35 injectors is called Brown Tops hince if they are brown your good.

that should help you alot



now turboing you stock motor is just plain dump you gain 20hp and your motor blows up in a month the cast pistons cant handle 6psi even for very long plus all the stuff you have to get just to do this is rediciolus it would cost you a good $500-$600 to do. me im doing my TC swap right now and i bought an 86 TC for $450 which is cheaper and i get the resale of the shell.

here it is plain and simple JUST BUY A TURBO COUPE
 

bonestock87

Founding Member
Dec 19, 2001
732
12
38
Cape Coral, FL
Jun 25, 2009
#14
  • Jun 25, 2009
  • #14
here it is plain and simple JUST BUY A TURBO COUPE
Click to expand...

I agree 100% that this is the easiest way. I just have never gotten any concrete proof that on a '91-'93 DIS motor, one could or couldn't incorporate the MAF. As I said earlier, let's put the fact that you need forged pistons and better valves aside. For someone like myself who does not have the time nor the room to do a donor car motor swap, I just have a hard time believing that what I'm proposing can't be done. I don't need 250hp out of my daily driver hatch. So if the effort was minimal and the cost was low, why not add some low-boost FI into this otherwise indestructible motor? Heck, an additional 30-40 horses would make a world of difference. What I think is that not enough folks have tried and/or documented the addition of low boost to an otherwise stock 2.3. Every single post you read where a newb is curious about going turbo ends up in everyone warning against frying the pistons and valves. Who here has the first-hand exprience to say that? It's usually just someone repeating what everyone else is saying so they can appear knowledgable.


Sorry for the long post.
 

93stangnow2.3t

New Member
Jun 24, 2009
10
0
1
Jun 25, 2009
#15
  • Jun 25, 2009
  • #15
if you can devote one complete week to the swap you can have it done i have spent about 5hrs on the TC trying to remove the engine and i have three bolts left to remove the motor and tranny in the stang it will be much quicker because there isnt any turbo so that is a full days work if you started at 10am and didnt stop until 8pm to have two motors out then doing the wiring and the other stuff you need to do it truthfully doesnt take as long as you think as long as you can devote a week or so to it. its been slow going for me because i have to drive 50miles to work on the car which means i can only work on it on the weekends.
 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,896
73
129
Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Jun 25, 2009
#16
  • Jun 25, 2009
  • #16
bonestock87 said:
Who here has the first-hand exprience to say that? It's usually just someone repeating what everyone else is saying so they can appear knowledgable.
Click to expand...

bhuff did it.
 

bonestock87

Founding Member
Dec 19, 2001
732
12
38
Cape Coral, FL
Jun 25, 2009
#17
  • Jun 25, 2009
  • #17
bhuff did it.
Click to expand...

I wonder at what level of boost. I would also be curious if all the other systems were up to snuff. (Enough fuel, good plugs and wires, 93 octane, etc.).

I'm not trying to grind an axe, I truly am just seeking answers. Normally I can sort through all the information and come up with something close to the facts. In this case, I just haven't seen enough info for me to say, "I can't put 6 lbs. of boost into my stock motor utilizing my MAF meter setup".

I really do appreciate everyone's input!
 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,896
73
129
Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Jun 26, 2009
#18
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #18
I can't remember...search his posts here, you should find it eventually, I'm pretty sure he posted about it here.

If not you may also be able to find it on turboford.net.
 

robbo1987*2.3*

Founding Member
Apr 22, 2002
445
0
17
varina, va
Jun 26, 2009
#19
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #19
"if you can devote one complete week to the swap you can have it done i have spent about 5hrs on the TC trying to remove the engine and i have three bolts left to remove the motor and tranny in the stang it will be much quicker because there isnt any turbo so that is a full days work if you started at 10am and didnt stop until 8pm to have two motors out then doing the wiring and the other stuff you need to do it truthfully doesnt take as long as you think as long as you can devote a week or so to it. its been slow going for me because i have to drive 50miles to work on the car which means i can only work on it on the weekends. "






you only need about 2 days if you have everything you need in 0ne weekend i swapped my car from auto 4 banger to a 5 speed turbo banger i can redo the 87-90 wiring in like 30mins and after that its a straight foward swap bring it to me and ill do it 4 ya for the right price lol
 

WHT306

Member
Oct 21, 2008
104
0
16
HUNTSVILLE AL
Jun 26, 2009
#20
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #20
Just put a 5 liter in it and be done with it, or put a super coupe 3.8 s/c engine in it
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Microsquirt tune for stroked 351W in a foxbody
  • roldy
  • Jul 26, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
5
Views
94
Digital Self-tuning Forum Yesterday at 6:42 PM
Noobz347
Distributor installed wrong
  • djj62478
  • Jun 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
212
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
K
Resolved Weird sound coming from a freshly rebuilt 5.0L
  • karhoot
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
212
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 27, 2026
Mac131
Fox won't crank over and fuel pump won't kick on.
  • djj62478
  • Jun 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
364
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 11, 2026
General karthief
Engine Hiccup at full throttle
  • keel
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
680
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 30, 2026
keel
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?