• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Upgrading heads on 04 GT

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mustanggt108
  • Start date Start date Jan 19, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 2 of 5 Next Last
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
Jan 20, 2006
#21
  • Jan 20, 2006
  • #21
yes you said it right Stage 1.. mine first of all are not Stage 1, and second my car dyno'ed 20 RWHP more than every other stock GT when it was bone stock. I dont know why.. but it did. I will have you a dyno sheet soon. until then believe what ya want to believe. It was the same thing I heard when I was told a Vert GT with UD's and 3.73's would not run 13.6... but it did andwas consistant until this mod. I have no new track numbers yet.
 
0

'03GTinFLA

Member
May 29, 2004
486
0
17
St. Petersburg, FL
Jan 20, 2006
#22
  • Jan 20, 2006
  • #22
01Steeda said:
I just put Patriot stage 2 heads and cams on my 01 steeda.. went from 248 RWHP to 336 RWHP. spent about 3000 including tune.... it was well worth it to me. going stroker shortblock now
Click to expand...
Alright, let me get this straight. You said, "and second my car dyno'ed 20 RWHP more than every other stock GT when it was bone stock." Bone stock GT's are around 220 RWHP, so you where what at stock, 240? You said you have full exhaust and and UDP's, and your at 248 with that. Around 8 hp gain from full exhaust and pullies? hmmmm. I'm missing something. What where your stock numbers that were 20 hp more than others?
Then you add heads and cams with tune and get 88 RWHP. hmmmm.
Seriously dude, I hope your telling the truth because I'll order those UDP's and Patriot heads right now. I would love to have that hp. I just have a hard time with your hp numbers when others with more mods aren't even close to your claim.
Where's that dyno graph. It can't take that long to download photoshop, can it. Just bustin balls brother.
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
Jan 20, 2006
#23
  • Jan 20, 2006
  • #23
Ok, here is my dyno from bone stock.. no I was mistaken when I said 248 with UD's and exhaust.. my car has always had exhaust.. but come on, how much does flowmasters help? still had cats and still have stock manifolds.

didnt get a dyno after the UD's or the tune.

http://members.cox.net/pitbull23/Dyno52805.jpg


believe or not, I am done arguing about something as trivial as this
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Jan 20, 2006
#24
  • Jan 20, 2006
  • #24
what is that? i have a dyno that says i had 241rwhp at one time....what the hell does that mean. where is the dyno for 336rwhp?

dude you must be joking. are you just assuming you gained that much hp from heads and cams. cars with blowers gain that much from heads and cams not n/a cars. theres no way you could have gained 88rwhp. even with a stage 2 cam, whats that give maybe 15rwhp peak then a stage 1.

not only that, mid pipe, pullies, catback should maybe give 15rwhp. so 225 which what most gts dyno stock + 15 =240rwhp. so we will say you picked up 8 from the tune. 248rwhp....that is not 20 hp over other gts.
 
J

jimfitzgerald

New Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,672
0
0
Jan 20, 2006
#25
  • Jan 20, 2006
  • #25
stangman said:
www.modularpowerhouse.com

only place you need to look
Click to expand...
Definitely
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jan 20, 2006
#26
  • Jan 20, 2006
  • #26
Your not making 336. I have a friend with a built VT motor, stg 2 heads, custom cams (between stg2 and 3), and a P51 manifold...+ all the boltons. He makes 332RWHP. STG 2 Patriot heads dont flow very well either.

And look at the dyno you presented, several things wrong.
A. your HP peaked @ 4400RPMs...GTs peak @ around 4700-4800, and by 5K when the guy shut it down your power is dropping like a ROCK. NOT typical of a GT...should go well past 5K before showing any noticable drop.
B. a GT DOES NOT MAKE 325RWTQ ALMOST STOCK!!!!

Looks something like an LT1 dyno to me .

Sorry, your credits going down hill fast....and its always funny how when someone has insane #s, their SCANNER IS ALWAYS BROKE! LOL. BTW im not saying that your car didnt make 336RWHP on that dyno, but that dyno has obvious "issues" if that really was your car, and it wont be accurate. Go else where if you REALLY are telling the truth and you will see maybe about 310RWHP at BEST.

Another guy on here has stg 1 VT cams and MPH STG 2.5 heads (flow MUCH more than patriots...like 20CFM....thats alot on the 2V world lol) and puts down 310 or 311RWHP.
 

Stang|ess

seeking cyber partner(s)
Oct 18, 2003
941
0
37
Hawaii
Jan 20, 2006
#27
  • Jan 20, 2006
  • #27
crap, I was about to start saving for heads and cams after hearing 336 rwhp.

peak hp is usually around 5600 isn't it?
 

stangGT97

New Member
Dec 22, 2004
1,299
1
0
Boston area, MA
Jan 21, 2006
#28
  • Jan 21, 2006
  • #28
good catch hotmustang331 - I also noticed his HP curve plummets after 4400, looks like an NPI HP curve, only with a respectable peak hp number lol. Stock torque does seem high. This guy is probably a Patriot sales rep trying to sell us on their product.

also, doesnt look like it was a dynojet... is it?
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Jan 21, 2006
#29
  • Jan 21, 2006
  • #29
not only does a stock gt make power to 5500 rpm, but if you had stage 2 cams you would be making peak power to 6000 and beyond rpm.

i think he be lucky to be making 280 to the wheels.
 
0

'03GTinFLA

Member
May 29, 2004
486
0
17
St. Petersburg, FL
Jan 21, 2006
#30
  • Jan 21, 2006
  • #30
01Steeda said:
i have underdrive pulley's and full exhaust.
Click to expand...
01Steeda said:
my car has always had exhaust.. but come on, how much does flowmasters help? still had cats and still have stock manifolds.
Click to expand...

Full exhaust does not mean just a catback. Just flowmasters don't do s**t, but LT's and O/R mid-pipe with a catback do make a difference.

Not trying to be a d**k, but it doesn't seem like you know what your talking about. Just post up your new dyno graph with an accurate list of your modifications.
If it seems legit, I'll apologize.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Jan 21, 2006
#31
  • Jan 21, 2006
  • #31
wow dude don't post like that.

i was going to suggest something completely different.

i know you guys are sick of hearing about 3v, but why buy those 3k heads or whatever they cost, when you are a cover, adapter plates for exhaust,and heads away from more power than 2v can ever make. i'm not talking about a whole swap, but 220 cfm/200 cfm intake/exhaust is typical for 2v ported, 3v heads start there. 220/189 in/ex. plus better cylinder filling and 260/208 ported. just wait a little while for them to get to boneyards. there are possible cover/block mating probs, but fix them. aluminum welding and milling is a small price to pay for getting in the 350 rwhp range. plus power starts in the 255-265 rwhp range. with no bolt-ons. all of you have expensive setups now. you have invested thousands in your cams intake and other stuff that has to be trashed. in return you get the best intake, heads out there. the stock 3v headers might even fit 4.6. just think about it before investing.

this might be a good time to wait for a better way. at least consider it. our cars weigh less than 05+.


as far as 2v. EVERYONE seems to like MPH. before i took the plunge i considered patriot. but their disclaimer aboutpossible break outs if i had any core shift scared me away. you mat never have ported a set of heads, but if you get too aggressive in the exhaust, the port will heat the water passing by the ex ports way too much. no heat rejection. fox lake is good too. or BOSS 331.

i put my "X" with MPH.



you guys are probably ignoring me at this point. i would ignore me. i suck. i will just go away into the hole from which i came.
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
Jan 21, 2006
#32
  • Jan 21, 2006
  • #32
believe what you wish, the guy asked and i told what my experience is, i could care less what an internet "guru" thinks. My car does what it does.

oh and full exhaust was done at the time of the heads.
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
Jan 21, 2006
#33
  • Jan 21, 2006
  • #33
ok,.. lets make this debate more intresting. All you e-dyno Guru's. My car is having a built shortblock installed over the next 2 weeks. I will probably have the car on the Dyno within 3-4. Nothin special on the shortblock, flat top pistons and a forged bottom. should be around 10:1 compression when done.

Patriot Stage 2 Heads and Cams
Steeda U/D's
Shorty headers, O/H pipe and Flowmaster 40's
K&N drop in, stock airbox and intake.

What should she make??? I'll Dyno her on 2 different Dyno's and we'll see how good you are.
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
Jan 21, 2006
#34
  • Jan 21, 2006
  • #34
and about the dyno that sheet is from.. that was done @ a dyno day and I had my doubts at first. After seeing 25 other cars dyno'ed that all made about what was expected I went ahead and took it. Like
i said after the engine is finished I'll go to 2 others and see what I get, if the numbers show his are inflated... I have eaten worse crow!
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Jan 21, 2006
#35
  • Jan 21, 2006
  • #35
01Steeda said:
ok,.. lets make this debate more intresting. All you e-dyno Guru's. My car is having a built shortblock installed over the next 2 weeks. I will probably have the car on the Dyno within 3-4. Nothin special on the shortblock, flat top pistons and a forged bottom. should be around 10:1 compression when done.

Patriot Stage 2 Heads and Cams
Steeda U/D's
Shorty headers, O/H pipe and Flowmaster 40's
K&N drop in, stock airbox and intake.

What should she make??? I'll Dyno her on 2 different Dyno's and we'll see how good you are.
Click to expand...
you don't even have long tubes...hmmmm i'll say your @285rwhp now and with the flat tops and maybe alittle more rpm range with the forged rotating assembly 300rwhp max.
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Jan 21, 2006
#36
  • Jan 21, 2006
  • #36
id say if you get all that done...also 300 max. i have l/t which will make more then your shorties na. however you will have the build short block making up for the power difference. you also have pulliesw and i dont, but i have a intake plenum. those should also equal out.

i have 290rwhp. the reason im willing to say you might get 300 max out of the set up is because your going with the stage 2 cams and i have stage 1 blower cams. so i will give you 300rwhp.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Jan 21, 2006
#37
  • Jan 21, 2006
  • #37
i give him 290. the exhaust will shift any cam to a lower rpm band. and 300 tq.

output is roughly 4x cylinder pressure. it will help a little, .6 point, but shortys still hurt tuning bad. better exhaust flow from lower restriction does not equal tuned pulses. he will lose 10 hp - 12 hp.i know squat about steeda intakes, but if his stock intake also flows 550ish cfm, that hurts more. so i take back the torque.


290hp and 308 tq. if the cams shift the max hp tq band out of the range of intake and exhaust there is a net loss. mismatch hurts. about the time the intake gives up the cams,heads come in.

but as you all know i am not a guru. so my opinion is worth squat.
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Jan 21, 2006
#38
  • Jan 21, 2006
  • #38
yea max 300. i figured around 290-300. 300 is not easy to make trust me i know. i was thinking about throwing on the p51 to hit 300rwhp, but that thing weighs so much that theres no point. id have more power but wouldnt pick up any speed. sorry off topic!
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Jan 21, 2006
#39
  • Jan 21, 2006
  • #39
electric water pump. degree the cams retard them 1 degree. add 15" vacuum pump, properly set up crank scraper/windage tray, mill the heads a little. 3" collectors w/ 24x3" extensions. etc.

bypass hydraulic pump for dyno and track.
 
M

Mustanggt108

New Member
Sep 23, 2005
221
0
0
Jan 22, 2006
#40
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #40
billfisher said:
wow dude don't post like that.

i was going to suggest something completely different.

i know you guys are sick of hearing about 3v, but why buy those 3k heads or whatever they cost, when you are a cover, adapter plates for exhaust,and heads away from more power than 2v can ever make. i'm not talking about a whole swap, but 220 cfm/200 cfm intake/exhaust is typical for 2v ported, 3v heads start there. 220/189 in/ex. plus better cylinder filling and 260/208 ported. just wait a little while for them to get to boneyards. there are possible cover/block mating probs, but fix them. aluminum welding and milling is a small price to pay for getting in the 350 rwhp range. plus power starts in the 255-265 rwhp range. with no bolt-ons. all of you have expensive setups now. you have invested thousands in your cams intake and other stuff that has to be trashed. in return you get the best intake, heads out there. the stock 3v headers might even fit 4.6. just think about it before investing.

this might be a good time to wait for a better way. at least consider it. our cars weigh less than 05+.


as far as 2v. EVERYONE seems to like MPH. before i took the plunge i considered patriot. but their disclaimer aboutpossible break outs if i had any core shift scared me away. you mat never have ported a set of heads, but if you get too aggressive in the exhaust, the port will heat the water passing by the ex ports way too much. no heat rejection. fox lake is good too. or BOSS 331.

i put my "X" with MPH.



you guys are probably ignoring me at this point. i would ignore me. i suck. i will just go away into the hole from which i came.
Click to expand...

so i could replace my stock 04 heads with 05-06GT's heads? will the fit right on? will i need a tune??
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 2 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
784
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
C
99 mustang gt no signal to fire coils
  • Cerana04
  • Oct 4, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
130
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 4, 2025
Cerana04
C
J
'04 3.8L V6 mineral deposits and oil on #3 cylinder. Does it need a rebuild or something simpler?
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 18, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
250
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jun 9, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
Engine Hiccup at full throttle
  • keel
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
554
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 10, 2026
Noobz347
E
4.6l auto to 5.4l 6 speed
  • EastanF5
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
181
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 22, 2026
EastanF5
E
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?