• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Upper or Lower Rear Control Arms ???

  • Thread starter Thread starter Katmandu
  • Start date Start date Aug 1, 2004

Katmandu

Founding Member
Apr 7, 2002
302
0
17
Troy, Ohio
Aug 1, 2004
#1
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #1
Which have the MOST impact on IMPROVING traction (on Launching) ??
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Aug 1, 2004
#2
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #2
You really need both to match but I would say the lowers because they hold the weight of the vehicle by the springs and hold all the forward thrust when accelerating, and breaking. The uppers controll axel windup and side to side motion.
 
F

fivepointohgt

New Member
Dec 30, 2002
86
0
0
YC, California
Aug 1, 2004
#3
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #3
My money would be on lower control arms. But you should upgrade both.
 
D

dude5l

Founding Member
Dec 24, 2001
201
0
0
Grande Prairie, Alberta , Canada
Aug 1, 2004
#4
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #4
You can get adjustable uppers to adjust pinion angle, which will greatly improve launching. Start with lowers though if your just doing one set at a time.
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Aug 1, 2004
#5
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #5
Best in a matched set, as said; otherwise, lowers are far more important, also as said. I'm with them. On a sidenote- it doesn't pay to bargain shop for these unless you are very easily satisfied.
 

Katmandu

Founding Member
Apr 7, 2002
302
0
17
Troy, Ohio
Aug 2, 2004
#6
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #6
stangbear427 said:
It doesn't pay to bargain shop for these unless you are very easily satisfied.
Click to expand...

What would you all recommend for a Lower Set ??
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Aug 2, 2004
#7
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #7
Maximum Motorsports or Griggs. I recommend them pretty much exclusively, and run only MM stuff on my own car; I'm sure others will chip in with a selection for you. Depending on how serious you are, you want something that won't bind. The only way to eliminate this is with hiem joints or spherical bearings, but use of arms with those will require you to run a panhard or watts link. They are also the most expensive, and transfer some noise into the cabin. I have them, and I kinda like it.
The next step down would be a three peice urethane bushing with a hard inner to prevent deflection and a soft outer to allow angular motion to combat bind. Not as good, not as expensive. There is a middlie ground between the two: the three peice bushing on the chassis end and spherical bearing on the axle end. Priced in the middle, and performance better than most people need. This peice is an excellent compromise, and highly recommended for someone who doesn't want or need to spring for the top of the line parts, and offer better performance than you will likely need on the street or even on the track while staying pretty quiet and smooth.
The bottom of the totem pole is solid urethane bushings, which will actually bind worse than stock rubber. MM has measure a wheel rate increase of 400% over stock with solid urethane bushed arms, and it only takes a 10% increase to upset the balance of a car. The only saving grace of these arms is that they are far stronger than the stock stamped steel parts, and the arms themselves do not deflect at all. Therefore, they are a big improvement up to a point. Once that point is reached, the fact that they bind even more than stock parts catches up with you. This is mainly a problem in the corners; if all you're concerned with is drag racing, they may be fine- but they will be more likely to damage your torque boxes than the other three options. Happy shopping
 
F

fivepointohgt

New Member
Dec 30, 2002
86
0
0
YC, California
Aug 2, 2004
#8
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #8
Katmandu said:
What would you all recommend for a Lower Set ??
Click to expand...

If you're interested in Maximum Motorsports, I'm going to be selling my MM standard lowers in the next couple of weeks. If you're interested, PM me or email me at fiveohfox@hotmail.com. MM also recommends the FRPP heavy duty uppers to compliment their lowers - I have those for sale too with brand new axle bushings.
 

Katmandu

Founding Member
Apr 7, 2002
302
0
17
Troy, Ohio
Aug 2, 2004
#9
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #9
Great info!

the three peice bushing on the chassis end and spherical bearing on the axle end.
Click to expand...

Where are these available from ??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
C
Suspension Rear suspension help
  • Clark302
  • Aug 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
349
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 17, 2025
Clark302
C
B
1968 coupe global west upper control arm template
  • Butchd88
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
208
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 12, 2026
Butchd88
B
New Products From J&M Products - 1979-1998 & 1999-2004 Race/Extreme Duty Rear Lower Control Arms
  • J&M Products
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • Vendor Sponsor Forums
Replies
0
Views
341
Vendor Sponsor Forums Oct 9, 2025
J&M Products
Which Lakewood Front Struts Would Work the Best?
  • 93gtmustang
  • Nov 7, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
158
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 7, 2025
Ethereal_Zer0
E
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?