• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

vacuum advance help needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter 68GEETEE
  • Start date Start date Apr 17, 2004

68GEETEE

5 Year Member
Nov 21, 2003
481
5
38
Texas, USA
Apr 17, 2004
#1
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #1
I set the engine to TDC, and re-installed my distributor with the rotor pointing at #1 terminal. I set the timing to 10 degrees btdc. The engine runs great, smooth, idles good, no longer runs hot and accelerates without hesitation. The only problem I still have is that she does ping while going uphill at highway speed. If I give it alot of gas, the pinging seems to subside. I rechecked the timing with the vacuum advance disconnected, and she is about 28 degrees at full throttle. When I reconnect the vacuum and accelerate , the timing jumps over 40. I know this isnt good.

The question is I have heard you can shim the advance so it doesnt go over 38. Does anyone know how to shim the advance?
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Apr 17, 2004
#2
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #2
While I don't have any experience with shimming the advance to change the amount of total advance, you could try an adjustable advance canister. I've installed a Crane adjustable on a car with an HEI ignition and it was a snap to install and allowed total adjustablity of the advance curve. While I don't know for sure that they make one for Ford distributers, I'd bet they do. Check with Summit, I think they're only about $20 or so.
 

fordman54935

Member
Jan 10, 2003
301
0
16
Wisconsin
Apr 17, 2004
#3
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #3
Are you using manifold vacuum or ported vacuum? I'm not positive if this would make a difference, but in my experience anyway I was able to cure an off idle stumble on my 71 Torino GT by switching from ported to manifold vaccuum. Apparently it advanced the timing enough to cure the stumble. Anyways, you could check to see if you are using manifold vaccuum, which may be bringing in too much timing advance at the RPM and load the engine is under while the problem is occuring.
 

68GEETEE

5 Year Member
Nov 21, 2003
481
5
38
Texas, USA
Apr 17, 2004
#4
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #4
fordman54935 said:
Are you using manifold vacuum or ported vacuum? I'm not positive if this would make a difference, but in my experience anyway I was able to cure an off idle stumble on my 71 Torino GT by switching from ported to manifold vaccuum. Apparently it advanced the timing enough to cure the stumble. Anyways, you could check to see if you are using manifold vaccuum, which may be bringing in too much timing advance at the RPM and load the engine is under while the problem is occuring.
Click to expand...

I am using a ported vacuum source. So you are saying that manifold vacuum may be lower and reduce the pressure on my advance unit?
 

68GEETEE

5 Year Member
Nov 21, 2003
481
5
38
Texas, USA
Apr 17, 2004
#5
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #5
zookeeper said:
While I don't have any experience with shimming the advance to change the amount of total advance, you could try an adjustable advance canister. I've installed a Crane adjustable on a car with an HEI ignition and it was a snap to install and allowed total adjustablity of the advance curve. While I don't know for sure that they make one for Ford distributers, I'd bet they do. Check with Summit, I think they're only about $20 or so.
Click to expand...

I will look into the adjustable, that may be the ticket.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Apr 18, 2004
#6
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #6
Manifold vaccuum will not cure a pinging problem. Ported is what you want. Either try the adjustable vacuum advance or buy better ( higher octane) gas. Also a cam swap can also cure the pinging.
 

351LX

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2001
1,007
0
0
Regina, Saskatchewan
Apr 18, 2004
#7
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #7
Read this link http://www.gofastforless.com/ignition/advance.htm There seems to be a lot of misconceptions about the types of advance and whether one is better than the other so the link will answer them.
 
O

Ozsum67

Too much thin air
Founding Member
Jan 6, 2002
5,152
0
0
Eastern Colorado
Apr 18, 2004
#8
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #8
Stronger springs will keep it from advancing too much.
 

68GEETEE

5 Year Member
Nov 21, 2003
481
5
38
Texas, USA
Apr 18, 2004
#9
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #9
Ozsum67 said:
Stronger springs will keep it from advancing too much.
Click to expand...

I thought the stronger springs would only be used if your mechanical advance was too far forward? Without vacuum, I am pulling only 28btdc at wot, which I think is within limits. Its when I connect the vacuum that the timing goes over 40. I am under the impression that the vacuum is the culprit, not the springs.
 

68GEETEE

5 Year Member
Nov 21, 2003
481
5
38
Texas, USA
Apr 18, 2004
#10
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #10
D.Hearne said:
Manifold vaccuum will not cure a pinging problem. Ported is what you want. Either try the adjustable vacuum advance or buy better ( higher octane) gas. Also a cam swap can also cure the pinging.
Click to expand...

Running 93 Chevron from the same gas station. This is only a problem when the vacuum advance is connected, so I am thinking an adjustable may help.

Would a different cam affect the timing at wot?
 

68GEETEE

5 Year Member
Nov 21, 2003
481
5
38
Texas, USA
Apr 18, 2004
#11
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #11
351LX said:
Read this link http://www.gofastforless.com/ignition/advance.htm There seems to be a lot of misconceptions about the types of advance and whether one is better than the other so the link will answer them.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the link, the end paragraph seems to say what my condition is, meaning you have to get the vacuum to limit how much more advance it forces on the timing, I am thinking my stock unit is probably not adjustable, so as previously suggested I may indeed try the adjustable advance and see how that goes. Thanks everyone for the good info!
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Apr 19, 2004
#12
  • Apr 19, 2004
  • #12
68GEETEE said:
Running 93 Chevron from the same gas station. This is only a problem when the vacuum advance is connected, so I am thinking an adjustable may help.

Would a different cam affect the timing at wot?
Click to expand...
Yes, I've got a stock pistoned 68 390 in a Merc Monterey that would ping it's butt off with the stock cam, but now after the overhaul, with a Crane 272 degree Energizer cam in it, it runs fine on 87-89 octane gas. Still the same pistons and heads, slightly less compression ( about a 1/4 point lower) with thicker head gaskets. ( 10.25 now vs 10.5 to 1 stock)
 

68GEETEE

5 Year Member
Nov 21, 2003
481
5
38
Texas, USA
Apr 19, 2004
#13
  • Apr 19, 2004
  • #13
D.Hearne said:
Yes, I've got a stock pistoned 68 390 in a Merc Monterey that would ping it's butt off with the stock cam, but now after the overhaul, with a Crane 272 degree Energizer cam in it, it runs fine on 87-89 octane gas. Still the same pistons and heads, slightly less compression ( about a 1/4 point lower) with thicker head gaskets. ( 10.25 now vs 10.5 to 1 stock)
Click to expand...

Being that I am a novice at engines, I wouldnt have thought about the cam aspect. Thanks for the heads up.

Yesterday, I stuck an allen wrench inside the vacuum advance nozzle and turned it about 7 turns counterclockwise. Then re-checked the timing, she was now reading 39 total advance, which is lower than it had been. I took the car out for a good road test, and got smooth acceleration with no pinging at all. I think I finally got this thing figured out!

Thanks again everyone for your help.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Resolved Need some assistance. Holley Terminator X alongside H/C/I. Very rough/inconsistent idle
  • karhoot
  • Jun 6, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
90
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
karhoot
K
2
Running very very rich
  • 2esoteric
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
335
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
Noobz347
H
Engine 1987 5.0 HO vacuum hose locations
  • harryhaber
  • Jun 20, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
500
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 21, 2025
limp
T
Help with a 95 5L crank no start
  • TheBubbaJoe
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
440
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 5, 2025
AeroCoupe
8
Engine Rough idle and aggressive sputtering when accelerating
  • 88vertible
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 13, 2025
Jarhead67
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?