• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Valve Cover Holes - yes or no?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fasttback
  • Start date Start date Oct 10, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Oct 12, 2006
#21
  • Oct 12, 2006
  • #21
65ShelbyClone said:
Are your covers baffled?

I have a 10k mile engine and still get the film somewhat, but my covers aren't baffled and neither are the breather extensions. I have some stainless potscrubbers I was going to stick in there, though.
Click to expand...
yet they are baffled
 
1

19stang66

Member
Apr 16, 2003
689
0
16
Oct 13, 2006
#22
  • Oct 13, 2006
  • #22
Does anyone know where you can buy the pcv stuff for a 289? On the passenger side valve cover all I have on the valve cover is a rubber plug. How does the pcv hook up to a Holley carburetor the correct way? Anyone have close up pictures?
 

GoinBroke

New Member
Jul 13, 2006
109
0
0
Joliet, Il
Oct 13, 2006
#23
  • Oct 13, 2006
  • #23
Measure the large carb intake barb and take the valve cover plug with you to a decent parts store. They should be able to set you up with a pcv valve and hose to carb for less than $10. I would recommend the pcv setup to burn the blow by and assist in ring seal no matter the engine ring condition.
 
1

19stang66

Member
Apr 16, 2003
689
0
16
Oct 13, 2006
#24
  • Oct 13, 2006
  • #24
Thanks!
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Oct 14, 2006
#25
  • Oct 14, 2006
  • #25
Remember that at wot there is almost 0 vacuum, so most blow by goes out one breather. Some blow by will find it's way to the baseplate, but will be restricted by the pcv valve and the small hose. One breather may not be big enough to vent all the blow by and actually have more crankcase pressure, causing less ring seal and more blow by. A few cars back had a pcv system and the filter had oil in it. My guess is that air must have been going out as blow by increased and only at idle/cruise there was enough vacuum to pull air through the crankcase.
 

fasttback

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
471
0
0
Northern CA
Oct 14, 2006
#26
  • Oct 14, 2006
  • #26
Good replies. I think I will go with two open breathers instead of one and a pcv.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Resolved PCV Tube and Valve Cover Breather Hole Locations
  • MDrisc
  • Sep 11, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 22, 2024
MDrisc
M
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
922
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
S
Valve Cover Breathers With S-trim
  • SSBLUBYYOU
  • Dec 21, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 24, 2017
SSBLUBYYOU
S
R
Fox Closed PCV System, Dual Valve Catch Can
  • RTW0223
  • Dec 6, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
14K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 30, 2021
jay98
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?