• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

We bought a fastback.....what to do

  • Thread starter Thread starter 10secgoal
  • Start date Start date Nov 2, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Nov 3, 2007
#21
  • Nov 3, 2007
  • #21
10secgoal said:
Dude, that is an awesome idea. The ONLY problem I can see is trying to sell a car for that much money when we're done. Maybe we can even put a systematic ATF drip in the down pipe to really get the effect of a junker.




Pretty much what we're thinking, except the CJ aspect of it. Guess that is what it would end up being though.
Click to expand...

gotta do the plain vanilla wrapper to pull it off though and no flashy chrome wheels either.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Nov 3, 2007
#22
  • Nov 3, 2007
  • #22
CraigMBA said:
I'd do a Bullitt inspired pro touring style rig with a 3 link rear, minitubs, turbo'd 351 (no stroker), EFI (so you can make whatever electronic tricks work to not boost first gear) and a six speed. I'd even paint it metallic green and leave all the chrome on it.
Click to expand...



already being done, Reen is building it.

http://www.reenmachine.com/albums/index.php/RM68004

http://www.reenmachine.com/forums/viewforum.php?f=23&sid=8934bdddc82c2dac35cfb1c4f4a943b1
 

CraigMBA

New Member
Mar 24, 2007
783
1
0
Orange, CA
Nov 3, 2007
#23
  • Nov 3, 2007
  • #23
That one doesn't look anything like the one I had in mind.

Think of a hybrid of the Reactor Mustang stance/Bullitt OG torque thrusts and sheetmetal/Griggs GT-40 suspension with more power........
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Nov 3, 2007
#24
  • Nov 3, 2007
  • #24
like this maybe?

http://www.reenmachine.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=131&sid=46f6d850e0df9e5e1e8c5b0bbd4f9bbd
 

CraigMBA

New Member
Mar 24, 2007
783
1
0
Orange, CA
Nov 3, 2007
#25
  • Nov 3, 2007
  • #25
Bigger tires in the rear. More offset in the wheels (deep lip). Lower stance. Torque thrusts with natural centers, green, and most of the stock chrome.

The one Renn is building is just a pretty cruiser. Mine would be much more brutal.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Nov 3, 2007
#26
  • Nov 3, 2007
  • #26
CraigMBA said:
Bigger tires in the rear. More offset in the wheels (deep lip). Lower stance. Torque thrusts with natural centers, green, and most of the stock chrome.

The one Renn is building is just a pretty cruiser. Mine would be much more brutal.
Click to expand...


ok. it'll be EFI'd, with either an IRS rear or a 3 link. he bought the car with the M-II already installed or he'd probably go with the RRS strut package too. no, it won't be as brutal as waht you're talking about but i bet it won't be a slouch. Reen if you read this i think the gauntlet has been thrown down...LOL
 

Decurion

Member
Sep 28, 2006
353
0
16
Livonia, MI
Nov 3, 2007
#27
  • Nov 3, 2007
  • #27
I like the idea of a Bullitt clone. I say use a windsor (stroked or not) with 6 speed. Keep it simple, and do the upgrades in sleeper style. Ive always loved the sleeper style, so make it look stock or stockish, but go like stink! Unfortunately, I have a feeling Im arguing a losing proposition.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Nov 3, 2007
#28
  • Nov 3, 2007
  • #28
Decurion said:
I like the idea of a Bullitt clone. I say use a windsor (stroked or not) with 6 speed. Keep it simple, and do the upgrades in sleeper style. Ive always loved the sleeper style, so make it look stock or stockish, but go like stink! Unfortunately, I have a feeling Im arguing a losing proposition.
Click to expand...

that's what 70 nitrouseater and myself both suggested too, sleeper. i say give them a tiny hint by painting like the 68 1/2 CJ cars, white with the flat black stripe down the center of the hood and 15" GT wheels, the argent painted ones bot the chrome ones, but don't give anything else away. oh, you will need the cj style scoop too, like the 69 mach 1 but those aren't the least bit threatening. keep the exhaust nice and quiet and run a small duration cam but those work better with turbo's anyway....
 

Cory281

Member
Jun 6, 2004
240
0
17
Nov 4, 2007
#29
  • Nov 4, 2007
  • #29
I'd make a Bullitt clone with some surprises under the hood.
 

mustang6tee8

Member
Jul 19, 2005
375
0
17
College Station, TX
Nov 4, 2007
#30
  • Nov 4, 2007
  • #30
why clone if you can dream?

10secgoal- some crazy collector would buy it after it gets in a few magazines
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Nov 4, 2007
#31
  • Nov 4, 2007
  • #31
I think i would stay with an 8.2 block. 9.5 blocks eat up too much room. If you are planing on more HP than a T-70 will make, you will need an aftermarket block anyway, just ask Paul. And while you are at it get the big bore block. I think they will go 370ci if you want. I would go the 4.125x3.25 bore and stroke for a 347. With a turbo it will still make over 1000hp and tq. Packaging will be a ton easier too.
 
M

mike93lx

Member
May 22, 2003
391
0
16
Hudson, MA
Nov 4, 2007
#32
  • Nov 4, 2007
  • #32
can you squeeze a turbo 5.4 or 4.6 in a '67 ? do something different and go for a motor. a twin turbo 32v 5.4 would be wild.
 
J

jbuening

Member
Apr 28, 2005
399
0
17
Nov 5, 2007
#33
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #33
mustang6tee8 said:
Do something NO one would expect. Make it a barn find lookalike, but with some surprises.
Click to expand...

So basically a ratrod mustang? That would definitely be different!
 

mustang6tee8

Member
Jul 19, 2005
375
0
17
College Station, TX
Nov 5, 2007
#34
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #34
jbuening said:
So basically a ratrod mustang? That would definitely be different!
Click to expand...

Not really a ratrod... Something that doesnt need chrome and exhaust rumble to attract attention
 
6

65mistress

Member
Aug 17, 2004
405
1
17
Generica USA
Nov 5, 2007
#35
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #35
I vote for keeping it mostly stock looking with little details on it that are not immediately noticable, but makes do a double take leaving you looking at it asking yourself what it is that your missing that makes the car all that much better then the one next to it, on the outside, but when you start it up you can notice the difference with the growl of the motor. Shaved bolts on the bumpers, clean up the body and leave just enough trim to keep them guessing.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Nov 5, 2007
#36
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #36
People are hitting on ALOT of things that we are thinking,too. Can't let the cat out of the bag quite yet though....

We had some time this weekend and decided to start the boring part of getting it down.








 

Attachments

  • strippedfbel7.webp
    2.8 KB · Views: 151
  • drillingspotweldfb6.webp
    2.8 KB · Views: 132
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Nov 5, 2007
#37
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #37
Then about 4hrs later



edit: pics aren't coming up- will try again later
We tested the cowl and it was good. But with the rest of the car in the shape it was, we figured it wasn't far out. Even then ended up not too bad. But we wanted to put new metal in because it was rusted, even though not directly in the normal spots.
The underside is getting a light blast and then the grill will be shaved. It does kinda defeat the purpose to cover the cowl after it's been replaced. But we figure it'll add value, and we want it done right, with no problems later.
 

Attachments

  • cowlremovedix4.webp
    2.8 KB · Views: 129
  • cowlremoved1nl8.webp
    2.8 KB · Views: 144
  • cowlundersidezg5.webp
    2.8 KB · Views: 142
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Nov 5, 2007
#38
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #38
is sleeper in there anywhere?
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Nov 5, 2007
#39
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #39
bnickel said:
is sleeper in there anywhere?
Click to expand...
mmmm, kinda
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Nov 5, 2007
#40
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #40
10secgoal said:
mmmm, kinda
Click to expand...


k, i'll be quiet now
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Tunerstudio help / services
  • Kabuki_notch
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
2
Views
318
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 2, 2026
Mustang5L5
R
Rcapri - 1980 Capri, bought new by inlaws
  • RCapri
  • Sep 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
989
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 20, 2025
manicmechanic007
What's your tow rig?
  • LILCBRA
  • May 31, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
211
Other Auto Tech May 31, 2026
LILCBRA
Stangnet T-Shirts
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 5 6 7
Replies
130
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 27, 2026
Noobz347
W
Speedometer and shifting issues
  • wyatt-tetro891
  • Aug 17, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
165
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 18, 2026
wyatt-tetro891
W
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?