• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Weiand Vs Edelbrock Intake.

  • Thread starter Thread starter guevara42
  • Start date Start date Sep 8, 2012

guevara42

Member
Dec 28, 2006
68
0
6
Jacksonville, Fl
Sep 8, 2012
#1
  • Sep 8, 2012
  • #1
Hey guys, going to be converting my 289 from a 2 bbl to 4 bbl in the near future. I'm undecided on which intake to use. Does anyone have any feedback on either a Weiand or Edelbrock intake? I'm going to install a Holley 4160 600 cfm. Feedback is greatly appreciated. TIA.
 

65FBE2

Member
Mar 8, 2007
283
0
17
Minnasnowta
Sep 8, 2012
#2
  • Sep 8, 2012
  • #2
Depending on how many mods your making. The best all around intake ever made is the edelbrock performer rpm. Works for anything slightly over stock to 500+ hp small blocks.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Sep 8, 2012
#3
  • Sep 8, 2012
  • #3
i have used both intakes, and i can tell you that application to application, they are very similar is performance. the qeiand action plus vs the edelbrock performer are nearly identical. the weiand stealth vs the performer rpm, the weiand stealth has a slightly wider rpm range, but not enough to make any real difference.

i say decide what rpm range you are building the engine for, and go with the intake you can get at the best price. as for the carb, i recommend the edelbrock carb as they flat out work great out of the box, and have more tuning range than the holley does. but again, you pays your money and you tales your choice. one other carb you might look at is the summit line of carbs. they are similar in design to the old autolite carbs, but use a lot of holley parts. the advantage over the holley is that they dont run fuel through a gasketed area like the holley does.
 

bartl

Active Member
Feb 4, 2001
218
8
29
West Rutland, Vermont
Sep 8, 2012
#4
  • Sep 8, 2012
  • #4
Stealth.
 

guevara42

Member
Dec 28, 2006
68
0
6
Jacksonville, Fl
Sep 9, 2012
#5
  • Sep 9, 2012
  • #5
Figured there wasn't much difference. I'll go with Weiand since I found a new one locally. Cthanks fellas.
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Sep 10, 2012
#6
  • Sep 10, 2012
  • #6
Having ported both, the Stealth has tapered runners, which (all else considered) flow a bit more than a runner with equal diameter. Port matching the Stealth is pretty easy. The RPM, on the other hand has some tapered and some non-tapered runners. Tapered runners can be opened up to fit the head port, but you should not open a non-tapered port (at least don't try to JUST port-match it). This is probably nuance and you can use either with good success. I mention the porting for those who would like to port match an intake to a larger head port, like an AFR head.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
748
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
650
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
354
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
S
Progress Thread 1989 LX 5.0 convertible - mild project
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
107
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Friday at 12:13 PM
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?