Went and got dynoed yesterday

stockstang50

Founding Member

Apr 25, 2002

238

0

0

houston, Tx

Mar 21, 2004

#1

• Mar 21, 2004

• #1

Well I finally went and did it before I spent a whole lot more money on this thing. On the third run it made 235.7 Hp at 5000 and 295.1 ft. lbs of torque at 3500. I think that is pretty good considering the mods I have.

 

stang_gt_1994

Founding Member

Mar 21, 2002

2,723

0

0

Powder Springs, GA (30 min. from Atlanta)

Mar 21, 2004

#2

• Mar 21, 2004

• #2

Does not sound right at all. The HP and TQ sounds right but the RPMs you made the HP at is way off. Should be between 4800-5000 RPM. I don't know, do you have the sheets.

 

stang_gt_1994

Founding Member

Mar 21, 2002

2,723

0

0

Powder Springs, GA (30 min. from Atlanta)

Mar 21, 2004

#3

• Mar 21, 2004

• #3

Ok you changed it, nevermind. Sounds about right.

 

stockstang50

Founding Member

Apr 25, 2002

238

0

0

houston, Tx

Mar 21, 2004

#4

• Mar 21, 2004

• #4

I was excited when they gave me the sheet. Nows its time to get the 347 goin

 

randomjoker

New Member

Sep 12, 2003

427

0

0

Oklahoma

Mar 21, 2004

#5

• Mar 21, 2004

• #5

nice #'s for ur mods.

 

S

SuperDust22

The Power of Pixie Dust?!

Oct 19, 2003

1,821

0

0

Gilbert,AZ

Mar 22, 2004

#6

• Mar 22, 2004

• #6

yeah those #s look good. But I think your 24 inj are an overkill.

 

Zero Signal

Active Member

Feb 24, 2003

2,633

2

46

Tucson, AZ

Mar 22, 2004

#7

• Mar 22, 2004

• #7

But I think your 24 inj are an overkill.

Click to expand...

That's just planning ahead

 

StangJonGT

Founding Member

Jun 2, 2001

1,329

0

36

Seattle

Mar 22, 2004

#8

• Mar 22, 2004

• #8

Jon

 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member

Sep 28, 2003

3,651

4

68

Indianapolis, IN

Mar 22, 2004

#9

• Mar 22, 2004

• #9

ummm...thats not at the wheels correct? Flywheel HP?

 

randomjoker

New Member

Sep 12, 2003

427

0

0

Oklahoma

Mar 22, 2004

#10

• Mar 22, 2004

• #10

those are dyno'd numbers so i would guess their rw.

 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member

Sep 28, 2003

3,651

4

68

Indianapolis, IN

Mar 22, 2004

#11

• Mar 22, 2004

• #11

maybe im missing something then....where did the extra 30 - 40 hp come from? It seems like the only performance things are the pullies, exhaust, and CAI. Whats up with the MAS (Mass Air Sensor?)

I thought we needed an intake to get those kind of numbers at the rear wheel.

Im guessing im just unfamiliar with one of the terms used in his signature....

 

randomjoker

New Member

Sep 12, 2003

427

0

0

Oklahoma

Mar 22, 2004

#12

• Mar 22, 2004

• #12

nmcgrawj said:

maybe im missing something then....where did the extra 30 - 40 hp come from? It seems like the only performance things are the pullies, exhaust, and CAI. Whats up with the MAS (Mass Air Sensor?)

I thought we needed an intake to get those kind of numbers at the rear wheel.

Im guessing im just unfamiliar with one of the terms used in his signature....

Click to expand...

lol

His motor probably in tip top shape, my guess anyways..

 

WhiteDevil

New Member

Feb 4, 2003

2,717

0

0

San Diego

Mar 22, 2004

#13

• Mar 22, 2004

• #13

I dont think i could see those numbers with the stock Intake manifold on there. But i dont see one in his sig.

 

9

96darkhorse

Founding Member

Oct 2, 2001

693

0

16

wilmington, california

Mar 22, 2004

#14

• Mar 22, 2004

• #14

wrong!! i made similar numbers and i as well have the stock intake....his mods are similar as mine.....i made 225.7 hp 292.0 tq and thats before i installed my asp pulleys.. good numbers by the way

 

X

Xanax

New Member

Mar 13, 2004

103

0

0

Mar 22, 2004

#15

• Mar 22, 2004

• #15

stockstang50 said:

Well I finally went and did it before I spent a whole lot more money on this thing. On the third run it made 235.7 Hp at 5000 and 295.1 ft. lbs of torque at 3500. I think that is pretty good considering the mods I have.

Click to expand...

Good numbers I must say.

 

Venom351R

Founding Member

Apr 27, 2002

4,548

41

98

MAINE

Mar 22, 2004

#16

• Mar 22, 2004

• #16

The long tubes must have something to do w/ it. I have simmilar mods only thing really diffrent is that I have a Cobra Intake, I pulled a few HP less but maybe his motor has very low miles on it.

 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member

Sep 28, 2003

3,651

4

68

Indianapolis, IN

Mar 22, 2004

#17

• Mar 22, 2004

• #17

thats crazy for a stock stang to dyno as much HP as a Cobra would if not more.

WHO KNOWS????

Great numbers, I hope i dyno as much when i go soon....

 

93 teal terror

Founding Member

Jul 13, 2001

971

62

69

Durham N.C.

Mar 22, 2004

#18

• Mar 22, 2004

• #18

I dyno'd 208hp and 278ft-lbs in my 93 5.0....a guy with a cobra that had full exhaust and wires and coil dyno'd 218hp and 285ft-lbs.....?
edit:a 95 cobra

 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.

Founding Member

Nov 29, 1999

5,676

1

76

Altoona, PA

Mar 22, 2004

#19

• Mar 22, 2004

• #19

Yeh, those do seem way high for a stock intake, but congrats none-the-less.

 

GTJake

Founding Member

Oct 28, 2002

3,049

0

56

Ann Arbor, MI

Mar 22, 2004

#20

• Mar 22, 2004

• #20

Striped5.0 said:

The long tubes must have something to do w/ it.

Click to expand...

I think it might. I'm a firm believer that long tubes are the way to go when doing headers. WhiteDevil and I have almost identical mods (except I don't have a TB or MAF) and I trap 1 mph faster than him in the 1/8. The only difference is that he doesn't have long tubes.

Jake