• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Went and got dynoed yesterday

  • Thread starter Thread starter stockstang50
  • Start date Start date Mar 21, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Mar 22, 2004
#21
  • Mar 22, 2004
  • #21
Yeah, those numbers are really high. But the long tubes increase torque at much higher rpm's, thus the nice peak hp numbers.

The 99+ 4.6L's get 20ft/lbs & 30hp from full exhaust w/ LT's. So add the pullies/programmer and nix the egr/smog, and you are pretty close to those numbers.

I would like to see the dyno! Scan it please!
Scott
 

VIPERn94Five-0

Founding Member
Apr 28, 2002
3,352
2
58
Poughkeepsie, NY
Mar 22, 2004
#22
  • Mar 22, 2004
  • #22
what type of dyno was it....we all know different types of dynos give different numbers....

....but none the less great numbers...looks like you got a strong one....




Anthony
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Mar 22, 2004
#23
  • Mar 22, 2004
  • #23
Don't want to dis but without an aftermarket intake it's kinda hard to believe.
 

Stump1000

New Member
Apr 5, 2003
495
0
0
Morristown Tn
Mar 22, 2004
#24
  • Mar 22, 2004
  • #24
I dont think its impossible. Im happy for him. Nice Numbers....
 

VIPERn94Five-0

Founding Member
Apr 28, 2002
3,352
2
58
Poughkeepsie, NY
Mar 22, 2004
#25
  • Mar 22, 2004
  • #25
VibrantRedGT said:
Don't want to dis but without an aftermarket intake it's kinda hard to believe.
Click to expand...
im gonna believe him cuz i have no reason to doubt him...but it does seem high....i am hoping for 250 WHEN i get my UD's....


Anthony
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Mar 22, 2004
#26
  • Mar 22, 2004
  • #26
Hey stockstang50: just scan the graphs and everyone will be satisfied....
 

stockstang50

Founding Member
Apr 25, 2002
238
0
0
houston, Tx
Mar 22, 2004
#27
  • Mar 22, 2004
  • #27
how do i make the file smaller so that it will let me attach the scan of my dyno sheet? Its saying that the file is way to big for me to post it.
 

stockstang50

Founding Member
Apr 25, 2002
238
0
0
houston, Tx
Mar 22, 2004
#28
  • Mar 22, 2004
  • #28
here is the graph. I had to cut a bunch off so that I could post it, but everyone here should be able to tell what it says.
The only thing that I have that is not in my sig is an msd blaster coil.

The 24lb injectors were planning ahead. It was 10:00 am about 65 deg.

The odometer stopped 6 months ago at 129301 miles and I drive about 20 miles one way to work so I figure about 160k and I dog the crap out of it

What is the point of spending good money on performance parts if your not going to use them on the street or the track.
 

Attachments

  • dyno2.webp
    119.8 KB · Views: 172

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Mar 23, 2004
#29
  • Mar 23, 2004
  • #29
looks good to me...AND you have all those miles racked up on it.

If that is the RWHP then i am really excited to see my dyno when i get it done.

CONGRATS
 

Joe 5.0

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2002
1,184
2
38
Macomb, MI (metro detroit)
Mar 23, 2004
#30
  • Mar 23, 2004
  • #30
Nice numbers. I put down 221 rwhp with only timing, silencer, o/r h-pipe & flows, and U/D pulleys. I am hoping for somewhere around 250rwhp with BBK LT's, TFS Intake, C&L 76mm MAF & 65mm TB.

Also what kind of dyno was it done on?
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Mar 23, 2004
#31
  • Mar 23, 2004
  • #31
I'm impressed! Way to go, and those are SAE too!
 

Scot_94GT

Founding Member
Jun 20, 2002
262
0
0
Spring Lake Park, MN
Mar 23, 2004
#32
  • Mar 23, 2004
  • #32
damn...the best I ever got with my G-Tech toy was 172 hp. Granted, all i have is a homemade CAI, catback, and a gutted stock maf...but still. myabe the G-tech is reading low for me

-Scot
 

stockstang50

Founding Member
Apr 25, 2002
238
0
0
houston, Tx
Mar 23, 2004
#33
  • Mar 23, 2004
  • #33
I just want to say thanks to the guys who took my word for it...Thank you.

To those who thought I was bsing ......HA IN YOUR FACE!! j/k.
 

VIPERn94Five-0

Founding Member
Apr 28, 2002
3,352
2
58
Poughkeepsie, NY
Mar 23, 2004
#34
  • Mar 23, 2004
  • #34
well i had some doubts but no more....lookin good...youve got a strong one....




Anthony
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

O
My rebirth, Hi from PA
  • onemore1987
  • Jun 28, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
111
The Welcome Wagon Jun 29, 2026
onemore1987
O
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
338
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
293
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
890
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
Specific Cam Questions that Google can't seem to answer...
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Jun 20, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
791
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 22, 2024
ChillPhatCat
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?