• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

what 302 blocks and heads are the same a 95

  • Thread starter Thread starter dbiser
  • Start date Start date Jan 2, 2008

dbiser

New Member
Nov 4, 2007
24
0
2
wv
Jan 2, 2008
#1
  • Jan 2, 2008
  • #1
hello i have a 95 gt and im looking for a engine to start rebuilding for a turbo setup what year blocks and heads can i use that will fit all of my stuff from 95 intake,headers, oil pan and all my asseries
thanks
 

fastgtfairlane

New Member
Apr 7, 2006
266
0
0
Jan 2, 2008
#2
  • Jan 2, 2008
  • #2
any 302 block will work and heads. the question is how much power are you looking for with the turbo setup. anything over 500rwhp is gonna be a short block life if the block is a 5.0 HO block. you can look for early 70s 302 blocks with a D0 or D1 cast on the side. they are stronger due to a higher nickel content. if you want the ability to really turn the boost up then i would look into a dart or a boss 302 block if the money permits it
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Jan 2, 2008
#3
  • Jan 2, 2008
  • #3
All of the roller blocks are the same, if you'd rather stay with a roller cam. Fastgtfairlane makes a good point about block strength, though. In high power setups, the block becomes the weak link, so looking toward the aftermarket is generally recommended. It gets expensive though, because the Dart blocks alone are pushing $2,000, and that doesn't include any machine work.

Any windsor heads would bolt right on, and all of your accessories would bolt to them. Just remember that if you stay with a factory set of heads and they come from a 351, you'll need the bushings for the headbolts, because the 351 uses 1/2" bolts, compared to the 302's 7/16" bolts.
 

millhouse

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
1,985
0
46
Simpsonville, SC
Jan 2, 2008
#4
  • Jan 2, 2008
  • #4
I'd just stick with your current engine with perhaps a hone, rings, bearings and some fresh headgaskets and studs. Honestly, your stock rotating assembly will outlast the block itself with a proper tune.
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Jan 2, 2008
#5
  • Jan 2, 2008
  • #5
Good advice above, but I would go with a forged piston if you rebuild the stock shortblock. They're a little more forgiving if you ping a little, than a hypereutectic piston is.
 

millhouse

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
1,985
0
46
Simpsonville, SC
Jan 2, 2008
#6
  • Jan 2, 2008
  • #6
StangGT1995 said:
Good advice above, but I would go with a forged piston if you rebuild the stock shortblock. They're a little more forgiving if you ping a little, than a hypereutectic piston is.
Click to expand...

While that may be true...honestly, there are ton's of guys over on turbomustangs that have ran them with great success. Hell, there have been a few that have split the stock block in half and threw the assembly into another junkyard block.

I myself ran a stock explorer longblock (sans intake) without any issues whatsoever. The only reason I can see to upgrade the pistons is if you plan on going .30 over. If so, by all means upgrade to forged.
 

dbiser

New Member
Nov 4, 2007
24
0
2
wv
Jan 2, 2008
#7
  • Jan 2, 2008
  • #7
so any 87 -95 engine would probably be just fine yes i would like to have a boss or dart block but that just cost to much. yea i was wondering if there would be any stonger blocks out there. is the 95 a roller cam i have been told it is and then some say no. how well does the supports they make work i seen some that bolt to the main bolts and some that bolt up in the oil gallery thanks for all your help guys
 
N

Nosfurato

Founding Member
Apr 8, 2002
296
0
17
Indiana
Jan 3, 2008
#8
  • Jan 3, 2008
  • #8
As far as the stock cast pistons go, my friends and I have had some pretty good "luck" with them over the years.

He had a 93 LX with heads, cam.. ect. he let a friend of his drive the car (not me lol) the guy missed a shift pretty bad, and buzzed the motor. everything seemed fine. About 6 months later, while replacing a headgasket (nitrous) we noticed that almost every piston had an extra "notch" in them. the valves had actually hit the pistons. So, we tore the heads down also.. some of the valves where bent,.. but in all honesty.. you would NEVER have known it. It ran the same ET's MPH ect, didnt burn oil.. nothing.

We fixed it up, (same pistons lol) put her back together, and it ran like a champ.. until we split the block in two!! and even when that crap took place,.. the motor STILL ran fine, just didnt have any oil pressure lol But, thats ok. it happened at the track, and we had trailered it down, so.. we loaded her up.. and off we went.

So, it could be a "hit and miss" deal.. but, we made enough power to split the block with the cast pistons.. like it was said above, if your tune is in check?.. I personally would worry more about the block, than I would be the pistons.

EDIT: yes, the 95 blocks are roller cam. every 5.0 (mustang) from at least 87 up is a roller motor. Im not sure about the other applications, the motor was used in a wide variety of vehicles that Ford produced, from trucks, to family cars.

The main differences are between the H.O and non H.O is the firing order, and I'm not sure about the valve-train.. but, I dont think they where a full roller deal like the H.0's.

As far as I know, the only MAJOR changes that happened over the years (H.0 motors), that "may" effect the strength of the bottom end is the pistons. Its either 90 or 91 that was the last year for the forged pistons, I know that 93-95 where cast.. beyond that, Im not positive when the change took place. I think it was 91, but dont quote me on that... because I think the "Cali" cars got the cast pistons first, then the fallowing year, every car had them. Im thinking Cali got them in 91, then the full changeover was in 92.. I could be wrong.

The reason for the change was emissions, as far as I understand. The cast pistons will expand quicker because of the heat, and seal the cylinder better/quicker than a forged piston will.

Anyway, sorry.. long ass'd edit.

Hope some of this helps.

My .02
Will.
 
9

95trippleblack

Member
May 15, 2006
60
0
6
Chicago
Jan 3, 2008
#9
  • Jan 3, 2008
  • #9
If your looking for a stock block with forged pistons you want something from a late 80s to 91 and some 92's. The forged pistons ones had a gray oil pan. Another option is to get a long block from a explorer then have gt40 or gt40 p heads and intake but they do have hyper pistons. The hyper pistons will work fine usually you split the block or blow a head gasket. before breaking a piston

I ran 18 PSI and a 50 shot on a stock 95 long block. No piston or block problems but finally blew a HG when I detonated it. The key is don't detonate it

Check out this from turbo mustangs http://www.theturboforums.com/stockblock.php
 
S

saf_blu302

New Member
Aug 24, 2025
9
0
1
Louisiana
Aug 25, 2025
#10
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #10
fastgtfairlane said:
any 302 block will work and heads. the question is how much power are you looking for with the turbo setup. anything over 500rwhp is gonna be a short block life if the block is a 5.0 HO block. you can look for early 70s 302 blocks with a D0 or D1 cast on the side. they are stronger due to a higher nickel content. if you want the ability to really turn the boost up then i would look into a dart or a boss 302 block if the money permits it
Click to expand...
So say I get a boss 302 (*m-6010*) block, will it take my stock components?
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,076
21,264
234
Box behind Walmart
Aug 25, 2025
#11
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #11
saf_blu302 said:
So say I get a boss 302 (*m-6010*) block, will it take my stock components?
Click to expand...

Yes
 
Reactions: saf_blu302
S

saf_blu302

New Member
Aug 24, 2025
9
0
1
Louisiana
Aug 25, 2025
#12
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #12
Noobz347 said:
Yes
Click to expand...
All of em? I mean like if I take everything out of my stock block and put it in the m-6010, it will work? Even the obd1 system?
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,076
21,264
234
Box behind Walmart
Aug 25, 2025
#13
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #13
saf_blu302 said:
All of em? I mean like if I take everything out of my stock block and put it in the m-6010, it will work? Even the obd1 system?
Click to expand...

The block does not care what fuel injection system you put in it.

The problem you will run into is the EEC's capability to [run] whatever combo you have stuck in there. It would require a custom chip-tune or a piggy-back.
 
S

saf_blu302

New Member
Aug 24, 2025
9
0
1
Louisiana
Aug 25, 2025
#14
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #14
Noobz347 said:
The block does not care what fuel injection system you put in it.

The problem you will run into is the EEC's capability to [run] whatever combo you have stuck in there. It would require a custom chip-tune or a piggy-back.
Click to expand...
I mean I was already gonna get a twEECer chip so
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,076
21,264
234
Box behind Walmart
Aug 25, 2025
#15
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #15
saf_blu302 said:
I mean I was already gonna get a twEECer chip so
Click to expand...

Steep learning curve, that.
 
S

saf_blu302

New Member
Aug 24, 2025
9
0
1
Louisiana
Aug 25, 2025
#16
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #16
Noobz347 said:
Steep learning curve, that.
Click to expand...
That it is, but one of my buddies has been tuning cars for a while, and I haven't heard anything bad about him and he said he'd teach me how tune the chip, I just wanna make sure this block is compatible as possible with oe parts.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,076
21,264
234
Box behind Walmart
Aug 25, 2025
#17
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #17
saf_blu302 said:
That it is, but one of my buddies has been tuning cars for a while, and I haven't heard anything bad about him and he said he'd teach me how tune the chip, I just wanna make sure this block is compatible as possible with oe parts.
Click to expand...

With [few] exceptions: A 302 is a 302. You can mix and match accessories, oil pans, pumps, carbs, fuel injection, like it's your very own AR-15 loaded up with all your favorite "bling".

About the only way you could find those exceptions are by getting into one-off castings specific to race teams that make or contract their own (not usually available to us mortals).
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,971
2,944
194
Middle of Maine
Aug 25, 2025
#18
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #18
An 8.2" deck block is a 8.2" deck block.
Does not matter if it is from a 67 Mustang or the Dart Iron Eagle Block out of my racecar.
Everything bolts up to it from any other 302 based block.
Obviously, it you bolted up stock parts to a Dart Iron Eagle block, we might ask that you get sent to a mental institution.
Why spend $3K on a race block for stock 302 parts?
You could, but why?
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,300
1,642
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 2, 2025
#19
  • Sep 2, 2025
  • #19
dbiser said:
hello i have a 95 gt and im looking for a engine to start rebuilding for a turbo setup what year blocks and heads can i use that will fit all of my stuff from 95 intake,headers, oil pan and all my asseries
thanks
Click to expand...

Save yourself the hassle and get a new block. It's chump change compared to what it's going to cost you to do a turbo setup with the supporting mods.

Kurt
 
Reactions: WhiteCobra95
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Intake
  • James S
  • Jul 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
166
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 12, 2026
James S
J
T
Oil burning on my recently buil 302
  • The blk67
  • May 15, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
153
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 15, 2026
Noobz347
For Sale Ford 331 stroker engine for sale - with options!
  • TTSaleen
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
6
Views
247
Engine and Power Adder Jul 2, 2026
Noobz347
A
Help ID - Turbo GT, SVO differences
  • aldoelmalo
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
83
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
aldoelmalo
A
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
806
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?