• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

what are your thoughts on a '92 5.0L Cougar engine

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarSaleenMustan
  • Start date Start date Apr 15, 2005
M

MarSaleenMustan

Founding Member
Apr 5, 2002
208
0
0
41
San Bernardino California
Apr 15, 2005
#1
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #1
just as the title says, the reason why i'm getting it is because it comes complete oil pan to intake and all accesories. it looks similar to the '94-'95 GT engine. The good thing about it is that its an HO motor and not only that but it may come with forged factory pistons. the car was built on 7/92 which is borderline for the last of the '92 5.0L motors that were the last year with forged pistons. the odometer on the car reads 140K miles, but i plan on doing a basic rebuild with 8-10psi in mind from a junk yard Twin turbo setup. I'm looking to spend no more than 500 including the cost of the motor.
 

gregpro50

Member
Sep 11, 2004
140
0
16
Binghamton NY
Apr 15, 2005
#2
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #2
I thought the cougar/tbird 5.0s were non-HO. Maybe I am wrong though.
 
F

fivepointNO

Founding Member
Jun 7, 2002
746
0
0
home.bellsouth.net
Apr 15, 2005
#3
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #3
That engine is all but sure to have gotten hypereutectic pistons from the factory. It is basically like any 5.0HO of it's era though. Good luck with it.
 
M

MarSaleenMustan

Founding Member
Apr 5, 2002
208
0
0
41
San Bernardino California
Apr 15, 2005
#4
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #4
fivepointNO said:
That engine is all but sure to have gotten hypereutectic pistons from the factory. It is basically like any 5.0HO of it's era though. Good luck with it.
Click to expand...
thats why with some luck it MAY have forged pistons because Ford stopped using them for the '93 up engines. this is a 7/92 car, so its border line, i'll find out when i take it apart Hope the pistons have TRW on em
 

squeeeg

Founding Member
Jul 4, 2000
1,905
0
0
45
Michigan
www.angelfire.com
Apr 15, 2005
#5
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #5
It is the same engine that is in our mustangs. Being built in 7/92 i am guessing that you are going to have hyper pistons. But like you said it is right on the line where they were changing over.
 
F

fivepointNO

Founding Member
Jun 7, 2002
746
0
0
home.bellsouth.net
Apr 15, 2005
#6
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #6
As I recall, Ford stopped using forged pistons in April of 1992 for all 5.0HO engines.
 
M

MarSaleenMustan

Founding Member
Apr 5, 2002
208
0
0
41
San Bernardino California
Apr 16, 2005
#7
  • Apr 16, 2005
  • #7
fivepointNO said:
As I recall, Ford stopped using forged pistons in April of 1992 for all 5.0HO engines.
Click to expand...

guess i might have to fork over some cash for some standard forged pistons.
 
M

MarSaleenMustan

Founding Member
Apr 5, 2002
208
0
0
41
San Bernardino California
Apr 16, 2005
#8
  • Apr 16, 2005
  • #8
would the wiring harness of of this '92 cougar work for a mustang?
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Apr 16, 2005
#9
  • Apr 16, 2005
  • #9
don't worry about the damn pistons. plenty of people run hyper's and boost, just be careful, and don't get greedy
 

squeeeg

Founding Member
Jul 4, 2000
1,905
0
0
45
Michigan
www.angelfire.com
Apr 16, 2005
#10
  • Apr 16, 2005
  • #10
MarSaleenMustan said:
would the wiring harness of of this '92 cougar work for a mustang?
Click to expand...

It should. There is no reason that I can think of that Ford would change wiring for the same engine.
 
M

MarSaleenMustan

Founding Member
Apr 5, 2002
208
0
0
41
San Bernardino California
Apr 16, 2005
#11
  • Apr 16, 2005
  • #11
v8only said:
don't worry about the damn pistons. plenty of people run hyper's and boost, just be careful, and don't get greedy
Click to expand...

thats the thing... i know i will get greedy and would want to push it to between 12-14psi.

i went back to the junk yard to pick up the motor, but i instead came home with one off an '89(build date 12/88)LX hatch, it was an automatic and still had the air silencer, i'm hoping it wasnt beat to death, the reason why it was in the yard was due to front end damage(sideways). the odometer read 69k, not sure if its 169 or just 69 interior was in great shape so i'm hoping for 69, but either way i dont think the motor was taken past 5k rpms in its life. i bought the long block and intake along with fuel lines and TB. i'm gonna tear it down and rebuild it hopefully not needing to be bored out so i can use the stock pistons and just get some new rings/bearings.
 

DJTR

Member
Mar 19, 2004
228
0
16
44
OTTAWA, Ontario, Canada
www.danceradio.ca
Apr 16, 2005
#12
  • Apr 16, 2005
  • #12
i'm thinking about getting an 87 cougar, COMPLETE just for the motor and rebuilt tranny for my car since I have no motor lol
 
M

MarSaleenMustan

Founding Member
Apr 5, 2002
208
0
0
41
San Bernardino California
Apr 17, 2005
#13
  • Apr 17, 2005
  • #13
xtrockx said:
i'm thinking about getting an 87 cougar, COMPLETE just for the motor and rebuilt tranny for my car since I have no motor lol
Click to expand...
if the price is right go for it... theres plenty of 5.0L engines in cars around these junk yards, but most are non HO, the one off the '89 lx i got and the one on that cougar are HOs, i payed 150 for the long block with intake, tb, and fuel lines. I removed the intake manifold tonight and didnt see any sludge in the lifter valley so that tells me the motor saw relative regular oil changes, i'll see what the bottomend looks like probably tuesday in my automotive class, tomorrow i'll be down in Buena Park for the Fabulous Fords Forever show at Knotts
 

squeeeg

Founding Member
Jul 4, 2000
1,905
0
0
45
Michigan
www.angelfire.com
Apr 17, 2005
#14
  • Apr 17, 2005
  • #14
You are lucky you have such choices. There isn't a 5.0 HO in all of southeastern michigan junkyards.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,264
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Apr 17, 2005
#15
  • Apr 17, 2005
  • #15
91-93 T-birds and cougars came with the 94-95 Mustang version of the 5.0 HO.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SOLD Sold.
  • TTSaleen
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
6
Views
316
Engine and Power Adder Jul 2, 2026
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
949
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
Progress Thread H/C Swap Problems/Ideas
  • sav22rem22
  • Mar 31, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 10, 2024
AeroCoupe
SOLD For Sale 92 Mustang Notchback Complete Rebuild in 2019
  • pearlnotchback
  • Jun 21, 2021
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
9
Views
4K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 24, 2021
Steel1
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?