• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

What do you guys think about 3.55's?

  • Thread starter Thread starter The Green GT
  • Start date Start date Jan 18, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
Jan 18, 2006
#1
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #1
I was planning on putting 3.73's in my '94, but after talking with D.Hearne who is a Site founder and a father of my best friend he thinks I should put 3.55's in it. This is his explanation.
D.Hearne said:
If you're going to do a gear swap, I'd go with 3.55's instead. 3.73's are a little much. You'll float the valves everytime you nail it in 1st, cause it'll tach out before you're ready to shift. 3.55's with your rear tire diameter is equal to what I've got in the Ranger with it's 3.73's, 28" tires and the Toploader's 2.78 1st gear.
Click to expand...
 

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
Jan 18, 2006
#2
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #2
Posted in wrong forum, can a mod please move this to 94-95 tech?
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Jan 18, 2006
#3
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #3
stick with your plan and get the 3.73's
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Jan 18, 2006
#4
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #4
def. 373's
I had 355's in a mild H/c/i 5.0 w/ bald tires and it wasnt enough gear. also sucked b/c at 50mph in 5th gear teh rpms were too low and it would bog down (e303)
I had 4.30s in my last car and it was fine
 

Stangfreak95

add a 4
Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
3,571
0
0
In your sister. If none, your mom
Jan 18, 2006
#5
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #5
Is your car auto or manual ? Either way, go at least 3:73's.
 

OrangeMustangGt

Founding Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,976
0
36
Cape Cod, MA
Jan 18, 2006
#6
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #6
3:73's.....your gonna wish for more gear if you get 3:55's.
 

xkuntrycowboyx

Member
Mar 31, 2005
281
0
17
Marion, Indiana
Jan 18, 2006
#7
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #7
I HAVE 3:55'S ...they were in it when i bought it.... i like them, they're nice, if you're looking for highest top speed running from the cops on the interstate go with them... haha.
Go with 3:73's, i want to swap to them. ...i have a 5spd btw.. n' 5th at 50 bogging is why you leave it in 4th haha, until it's time to shift... no but reallly 55 in 5th is like 15-1600 rpm if you're wondering and not really bogging
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Jan 18, 2006
#8
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #8
3:73's are the minimum to get. Valve float? You don't need gears for that to happen. I wish I had 4:10's or 30's.
 

95riosnake

Member
Dec 21, 2003
630
0
17
Pittsburgh, PA
Jan 18, 2006
#9
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #9
I went with 3.55's based soley on the fact that I plan to do a pretty serious power adder in the future and was worried 3.73 might be too much with a big power adder.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jan 18, 2006
#10
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #10
Originally Posted by D.Hearne
If you're going to do a gear swap, I'd go with 3.55's instead. 3.73's are a little much. You'll float the valves everytime you nail it in 1st, cause it'll tach out before you're ready to shift. 3.55's with your rear tire diameter is equal to what I've got in the Ranger with it's 3.73's, 28" tires and the Toploader's 2.78 1st gear.

1) Toploader Old School 4 speed trans

2) 28" tall tires doubt if your tires are that tall

Not too sure if 1 & 2 can be used to help you get an idea about your gear ratio choice.

You never said if you're a stick or an auto
but
I'd go no less than 373's IF you're gonna stay NA

Here ... Play with this and let the math give you facts as opposed to all of our opinions

http://www.allfordmustangs.com/Detailed/608.shtml

Grady
 

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
Jan 18, 2006
#11
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #11
I have a 5-speed.

Question about 3.73's VS 3.55's: How do they affect your shifting. Like right now I have to shift to second at 40 and to 3rd at 75-80. How do 3.73's change that and how do 3.55's change that? Also, how does it affect gas miledge. This is my daily after all.
 

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
Jan 18, 2006
#12
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #12
final5-0 said:
1) Toploader Old School 4 speed trans

2) 28" tall tires doubt if your tires are that tall
Click to expand...
No, Ive driven that truck, and been riding in it for a few years. they are 28"
 

RIO5.0

15 Year Member
Feb 16, 2001
6,892
8
128
N.H.
Jan 18, 2006
#13
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #13
The Green GT said:
I have a 5-speed.

Question about 3.73's VS 3.55's: How do they affect your shifting. Like right now I have to shift to second at 40 and to 3rd at 75-80. How do 3.73's change that and how do 3.55's change that? Also, how does it affect gas miledge. This is my daily after all.
Click to expand...

Going by your sig...which looks like your basically stock??? 373s would be a wiser choice for more hit/fun....I was mooded and ran 355s for 2 seasons...They're nice and a much needed improvment over the stock 273s...I then went to 373s and like them better...1st is kinda short, but from there on out they're the balls...5th will actually be usable with em...
You speedo will be off with the 373s and your milage should take a small hit...But Mustangs ain't for MPG anyway..
 

stang302v8

New Member
Aug 16, 2005
94
0
0
carlisle, pa
Jan 18, 2006
#14
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #14
i have a c4 3 speed automatic and 3;50's are about the maximum that i can go for it to be streetable on the highway. if i went to 3;70's i would be taching out at like 4 grand going 65-70mph! and I would be topping out at like 110 mph. old school c4 3 speed slushboxes, gotta love em'
 

R.J.

Member
Aug 20, 2003
813
0
16
Warwick, Rhode Island
Jan 18, 2006
#15
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #15
That’s a great calculator, but I am confused. If that is accurate, I got these numbers:
T5 with 245x45x16 tires (stock)

3:55's (I have these) at 70mph
3rd 4501
4th 3384
5th 2301

This is consistent with my car.
Now are these numbers consistent with anybody's car with these gears?

3:73's 4:10's at 70mph
3rd 4729 5198
4th 3555 3908
5th 2418 2651

The reason I ask is most people are against 4:10's on the highway, because the car will be "screaming" the whole time. "If you do a lot of driving on the highway, don't get 4:10's". I don't think 2,651 rpms is screaming at all. I drive 90 miles, round trip, to work each day and I believed the highway gear horror stories and settled for 3:55's. If these numbers are accurate I'm getting some 4:10's. Can anybody confirm these numbers?
 

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
Jan 18, 2006
#16
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #16
RIO5.0 said:
Going by your sig...which looks like your basically stock??? 373s would be a wiser choice for more hit/fun....I was mooded and ran 355s for 2 seasons...They're nice and a much needed improvment over the stock 273s...I then went to 373s and like them better...1st is kinda short, but from there on out they're the balls...5th will actually be usable with em...
You speedo will be off with the 373s and your milage should take a small hit...But Mustangs ain't for MPG anyway..
Click to expand...
Its stock except for the roller rockers, there the ones from a Cobra I think, and king Cobra clutch kit, and straight pipes with side exhaust. And just how much will my speedo be off?
 

Cobra4075

Founding Member
Feb 18, 2002
286
1
17
Tinley Park, IL
Jan 18, 2006
#17
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #17
I went with 355s from a stock 308. I really couldn't feel the difference. Wish I went with 410s. Now that I'm putting a turbo on, the 355s are the max with a power adder like that.
 

buddyf87

Member
Jun 27, 2005
94
0
6
Clarksville, TN
Jan 18, 2006
#18
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #18
I've got 4.10's in my Cobra (they were in the car when i bought it) and kind of wish I had 3.73's, simply because i spin through first no matter what and through second if i nail it (keep in mind this is just with bolt-ons). It'll go about 30 in 1st, 50 in 2nd, 75-80 in 3rd, and 100 in 4th.

R.J.- Those numbers are right on for 4.10's at 70, and at 50 I'm turning around 1900.

That being said, if I ever get any big mods, I will pretty much have to get a lower gear if I ever want to use first. But for a bolt-on car, assuming it's not driven exclusively on the highway, 4.10's are great, especially for impressing your friends with crazy fast runs up to 100. Hope that helps.
 

91LX_5L

Founding Member
May 13, 2002
1,943
0
36
British Columbia
Jan 18, 2006
#19
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #19
I had 373 in my last car, I WISH I HAD 373 NOW, I put 355s in.
 

RIO5.0

15 Year Member
Feb 16, 2001
6,892
8
128
N.H.
Jan 18, 2006
#20
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #20
The Green GT said:
Its stock except for the roller rockers, there the ones from a Cobra I think, and king Cobra clutch kit, and straight pipes with side exhaust. And just how much will my speedo be off?
Click to expand...

I can't recall the exact number but you'll notice it right off...You go for a ride after the swap and it'll be cruising at like 90 or some crazy chit....
I put in a White 21 tooth gear in and mines still off buy 4 MPH or so, thats according to those radar things the cops put out...
If you have high miles you should also do the Trac-Loc rebuild....with gears you'll tend to wanna smolder the tires more often cause its easier...
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Thinking About Either Trading Or Selling My Mustang, What Do You Guys Think Its Worth?
  • usaf_branham
  • Apr 15, 2015
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
2K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 21, 2015
03_TrueBlue_GT
  • Locked
Just Some Suggestion's For Foxes
  • Detroiit
  • Jul 24, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2014
Noobz347
Year Around Ford Mustang action via iRacing
  • MRaburn
  • Mar 19, 2013
  • StangNet Site News
Replies
0
Views
4K
StangNet Site News Mar 19, 2013
MRaburn
B
thinking what to do, any input?
  • benjammcd
  • Feb 1, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
685
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 2, 2011
90stang5speed
9
I
To mod, or not to mod...what do you think??
  • im4darush
  • Jun 15, 2010
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 24, 2010
302Feen
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?