final5-0 said:All of the well known heads will get you to your goal of 300rwhp.
For the most part, you can see the same kind of results with the various well known intakes as well.
IMHO, your choice of cam can be more critical in the success of the combo.
What I find so interesting is if you compare the dyno results of combos you find on these various sites you will quickly see the way they make their power is not the same between them even though they all put up numbers around 300 rwhp.
IMHO, the Question is not about ................
which h/c/i combo is best
but
what are your expectations from a combo?
A great 1/4 mile strip burner most likely won't make the best street car and vice versa.
Grady
GRGT1994 said:I don't follow. You want a HCI on your high mileage stock motor for a year or two. They you intend to go with a crate motor. Why spend all that cash twice?
Huh? The first guy didn't say anything about a crate motor....Car Nut said:I'm almost at 150,000 miles, but I'm afraid to do anything to this engine. It has never been cracked open and is still running great. I'm going to run this engine for another 1-2 years and then remove it for a crate motor. Gotta finish the foundation first.
GRGT1994 said:I don't follow. You want a HCI on your high mileage stock motor for a year or two. They you intend to go with a crate motor. Why spend all that cash twice?
Just put it on the bottle for now, that should give you some power. Then do the crate engine even sooner.
Car Nut said:This is a great response (above).
I'm building a totally street car AND I have to pass emissions. What a pain! But, the good thing is there are plenty of choices out there centered around a mild cam which will take me to the 300rwhp and beyond while remaining streetable and emissions friendly. If I stuck with the 302 NA, I would probably consider the Performer Intake, AFR 165 legal heads, and a mild cam by a reputable company. Add on a full exhaust and whatever else necessary for the new h/c/i to work and I think this would be a great street combo. However, stroking the 302 to 347 would be even more powerful and I could upgrade all of the engine internals and still pass emissions. Of course, a few more things would need to be upgraded to run the 347, but it would all be in the name of added power, driveability, and reliability.
I said all that above for a reason. If emissions weren't a factor and if this wasn't a daily driver, I would go a completely different direction and use different parts. And it would cost less. Good to know all this up front, though.
I'm almost at 150,000 miles, but I'm afraid to do anything to this engine. It has never been cracked open and is still running great. I'm going to run this engine for another 1-2 years and then remove it for a crate motor. Gotta finish the foundation first.
sage2k said:trick flow kit
jtb19nh said:i have a 95 gt the engine is stock with 150000 mi. i am looking for more power what h/c/i should i get. it is a daily driver. i am looking to eventually be around 300 rwhp.